Despite the current expansion of interest in soundscapes, the roles and application of the concept, vis-a-vis that of environmental noise management, have not been adequately articulated. Soundscapes and environmental noise management are complementary, not competing, approaches with respect to the study and management of the outdoor acoustic environment. Their complementarity is best demonstrated by focusing on fundamental distinctions between them. This paper introduces the notion of the acoustic environment as a resource to be managed for different beneficial uses and for diversity, and with a focus on sounds of human preference. It provides the opportunity for a more nuanced understanding of human response to the acoustic environment. By contrast, environmental noise management focuses on sound as a waste, and on reducing the extent and intensity of its adverse effects on people. Soundscape design, planning and management are a useful augmentation to environmental noise management approaches, potentially expanding the scope of application of the tools of acoustic specialists. The two fields require quite different approaches to measurement
[1]
Jian Kang,et al.
Towards some standardization in assessing soundscape preference
,
2009
.
[2]
C. Lavandier,et al.
The contribution of sound source characteristics in the assessment of urban soundscapes
,
2006
.
[3]
C. Guastavino.
The ideal urban soundscape : Investigating the sound quality of french cities
,
2006
.
[4]
Hamza Zeghlache,et al.
Recomposition of the urban sonic environment
,
2006
.
[5]
P. Hedfors,et al.
The Sounds of Two Landscape Settings: Auditory concepts for physical planning and design
,
2003
.
[6]
A. Gidlöf-Gunnarsson,et al.
Noise and well-being in urban residential environments: The potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas
,
2007
.
[7]
L. M. Anderson,et al.
Effects of Sounds on Preferences for Outdoor Settings
,
1983
.