A Follow-up of Follow Through: The Later Effects of the Direct Instruction Model on Children in Fifth and Sixth Grades

The later effects of the Direct Instruction Follow Through program were assessed at five diverse sites. Low-income fifth and sixth graders who had completed the full 3 years of this first- through third-grade program were tested on the Metropolitan Achievement Test (Intermediate level) and the Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT). Results were contrasted with those of children in local comparison groups using analysis of covariance procedures. Results indicated consistently strong, significant effects in WRAT reading scores (decoding), consistent effects in math problem solving and spelling, and moderate effects in most other academic domains. Students appeared to retain the knowledge and problem-solving skills they had mastered in the primary grades. However, without a continuing program, most students demonstrated losses when compared to the standardization sample of the achievement tests. Implications for improved instruction in the intermediate grades were discussed.

[1]  P. A. Weaver,et al.  Theory and practice of early reading , 1979 .

[2]  S. Engelmann,et al.  Analysis of Achievement Data on Six Cohorts of Low-Income Children From 20 School Districts in the University of Oregon Direct Instruction Follow Through Model. , 1976 .

[3]  R. Hyman.  Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings (Book) , 1982 .

[4]  C. Evertson,et al.  Learning from Teaching: A Developmental Perspective , 1976 .

[5]  Nathaniel Gage,et al.  The Scientific Basis of The Art of Teaching/N.L. Gage , 1979 .

[6]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Coding and Comprehension in Skilled Reading and Implications for Reading Instruction. , 1977 .

[7]  Mary M. Kennedy,et al.  Findings from the Follow Through Planned Variation Study , 1978 .

[8]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Rating the Importance of Structural Units of Prose Passages: A Problem of Metacognitive Development. , 1977 .

[9]  Russell Gersten,et al.  Instructional strategies for studying content area texts in the intermediate grades. , 1982 .

[10]  R. Boruch,et al.  3 – Making the Case for Randomized Assignment to Treatments by Considering the Alternatives: Six Ways in Which Quasi-Experimental Evaluations In Compensatory Education Tend to Underestimate Effects , 1975 .

[11]  Robert J. Stevens,et al.  Advances in research on teaching , 1981 .

[12]  L. V. Jones,et al.  Models for testing the significance of combined results. , 1953, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  John C. Bianchini,et al.  Anchor Test Study. Equivalence and Norms Tables for Selected Reading Achievement Tests (Grades 4, 5, 6). , 1974 .

[14]  M. L. Smith,et al.  Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. , 1977, The American psychologist.

[15]  Linda B. Stebbins,et al.  Education as Experimentation: A Planned Variation Model. Volume IIIA: Findings: Cohort II; Interim Findings: Cohort III. Volume IIIB: Appendices. , 1976 .

[16]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[17]  G. Glass.  Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research1 , 1976 .

[18]  C. Bereiter,et al.  A constructive look at follow through results , 1981 .

[19]  David B. Pillemer,et al.  Synthesizing Outcomes: How to Use Research Evidence from Many Studies. , 1980 .

[20]  A. A. Lumsdaine,et al.  Evaluation and Experiment: Some Critical Issues in Assessing Social Programs , 1976 .

[21]  Dolores Durkin,et al.  What Classroom Observations Reveal about Reading Comprehension Instruction. Technical Report No. 106. , 1978 .

[22]  M. Stein,et al.  What next after decoding? instruction and research in reading comprehension , 1981 .

[23]  Decker Walker,et al.  No Simple Answer: Critique of the Follow Through Evaluation , 1978 .

[24]  Donald P. Horst,et al.  A Practical Guide to Measuring Project Impact on Student Achievement. Monograph Series on Evaluation in Education No. 1. , 1975 .

[25]  The Sixth Mental Measurements Yearbook , 1966 .

[26]  Douglas A. Grouws,et al.  The Missouri Mathematics Effectiveness Project: An experimental study in fourth-grade classrooms. , 1979 .

[27]  Marcia Farr Whiteman,et al.  Writing: The Nature, Development, and Teaching of Written Communication. Volume 1, Variation in Writing: Functional and Linguistic-Cultural Differences. , 2013 .

[28]  Wesley C. Becker,et al.  Teaching Reading and Language to the Disadvantaged--What We Have Learned from Field Research. , 1977 .

[29]  Jeanne Chall,et al.  The Great Debate: Ten Years Later, with a Modest Proposal for Reading Stages. , 1976 .

[30]  Janet D. Elashoff,et al.  Analysis of Covariance: A Delicate Instrument1 , 1969 .

[31]  R. P. Carver.  The Case Against Statistical Significance Testing , 1978 .