Experimental assessment of downstream environmental DNA patterns under variable fish biomass and river discharge rates

[1]  R. Brys,et al.  Using quantitative eDNA analyses to accurately estimate American bullfrog abundance and to evaluate management efficacy , 2022, Environmental DNA.

[2]  L. Bernatchez,et al.  Cage transplant experiment shows weak transport effect on relative abundance of fish community composition as revealed by eDNA metabarcoding , 2022, Ecological Indicators.

[3]  Sarah J. Bourlat,et al.  A practical guide to DNA-based methods for biodiversity assessment , 2021 .

[4]  L. Bernatchez,et al.  Effect of biotic and abiotic factors on the production and degradation of fish environmental DNA: An experimental evaluation , 2021, Environmental DNA.

[5]  Y. Yamashita,et al.  Environmental DNA emission by two carangid fishes in single and mixed-species tanks , 2021, Fisheries Science.

[6]  L. Bernatchez,et al.  Proper environmental DNA metabarcoding data transformation reveals temporal stability of fish communities in a dendritic river system , 2021, Environmental DNA.

[7]  M. Kinnison,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity of eDNA Transport Improves Stream Assessment of Threatened Salmon Presence, Abundance, and Location , 2021, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.

[8]  Ashley M. Fowler,et al.  Environmental DNA (eDNA) as a tool for assessing fish biomass: A review of approaches and future considerations for resource surveys , 2021, Environmental DNA.

[9]  R. Brys,et al.  Effects of preservation strategies on environmental DNA detection and quantification using ddPCR , 2021 .

[10]  D. Gleeson,et al.  Improving the detection of rare native fish species in environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys , 2021, ARPHA Conference Abstracts.

[11]  Bettina Thalinger,et al.  The Effect of Activity, Energy Use, and Species Identity on Environmental DNA Shedding of Freshwater Fish , 2020, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.

[12]  Bettina Thalinger,et al.  Lateral and longitudinal fish environmental DNA distribution in dynamic riverine habitats , 2020 .

[13]  J. Auwerx,et al.  Monitoring of spatiotemporal occupancy patterns of fish and amphibian species in a lentic aquatic system using environmental DNA , 2020, Molecular ecology.

[14]  Mark A. Davis,et al.  High stream flows dilute environmental DNA (eDNA) concentrations and reduce detectability , 2020, Diversity and Distributions.

[15]  Shuping Wang,et al.  Methodology of fish eDNA and its applications in ecology and environment. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[16]  L. Bernatchez,et al.  Caged fish experiment and hydrodynamic bidimensional modeling highlight the importance to consider 2D dispersion in fluvial environmental DNA studies , 2020 .

[17]  J. Karlsson,et al.  Droplet digital PCR applied to environmental DNA, a promising method to estimate fish population abundance from humic‐rich aquatic ecosystems , 2020 .

[18]  Luca Carraro,et al.  How to design optimal eDNA sampling strategies for biomonitoring in river networks , 2020, bioRxiv.

[19]  C. Goldberg,et al.  Spatial and temporal patterns of environmental DNA detection to inform sampling protocols in lentic and lotic systems , 2020, Ecology and evolution.

[20]  David A. Bohan,et al.  Ecosystems monitoring powered by environmental genomics: A review of current strategies with an implementation roadmap , 2020, Molecular ecology.

[21]  D. Fraser,et al.  The relationship between eDNA particle concentration and organism abundance in nature is strengthened by allometric scaling , 2020, Molecular ecology.

[22]  S. Rogers,et al.  Predicting the fate of eDNA in the environment and implications for studying biodiversity , 2019, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

[23]  Emanuel A. Fronhofer,et al.  Assessing different components of diversity across a river network using eDNA , 2019, Environmental DNA.

[24]  Horiuchi Tomoya,et al.  Biomass-dependent emission of environmental DNA in jack mackerel Trachurus japonicus juveniles. , 2019, Journal of fish biology.

[25]  A. Coulter,et al.  Nonlinear relationship between Silver Carp density and their eDNA concentration in a large river , 2019, PloS one.

[26]  C. Goldberg,et al.  Stream Transport and Retention of Environmental DNA Pulse Releases in Relation to Hydrogeomorphic Scaling Factors. , 2019, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  D. Fraser,et al.  Meta‐analysis supports further refinement of eDNA for monitoring aquatic species‐specific abundance in nature , 2019, Environmental DNA.

[28]  Satoshi Yamamoto,et al.  Effect of water temperature and fish biomass on environmental DNA shedding, degradation, and size distribution , 2019, Ecology and evolution.

[29]  C. Hardy,et al.  Monitoring riverine fish communities through eDNA metabarcoding: determining optimal sampling strategies along an altitudinal and biodiversity gradient , 2018, Metabarcoding and Metagenomics.

[30]  A. Maruyama,et al.  Environmental DNA analysis as a non‐invasive quantitative tool for reproductive migration of a threatened endemic fish in rivers , 2018, Ecology and evolution.

[31]  H. MacIsaac,et al.  Early detection of a highly invasive bivalve based on environmental DNA (eDNA) , 2018, Biological Invasions.

[32]  Lauren M. Sassoubre,et al.  Quantification of Environmental DNA (eDNA) Shedding and Decay Rates for Three Marine Fish. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  Adam J. Sepulveda,et al.  Understanding environmental DNA detection probabilities: A case study using a stream-dwelling char Salvelinus fontinalis , 2015 .

[34]  Todd W. Pierson,et al.  The effect of dilution and the use of a post-extraction nucleic acid purification column on the accuracy, precision, and inhibition of environmental DNA samples , 2015 .

[35]  Kristy Deiner,et al.  Special Issue Article: Environmental DNA Choice of capture and extraction methods affect detection of freshwater biodiversity from environmental DNA , 2015 .

[36]  R. Lance,et al.  Mitochondrial Genome Sequencing and Development of Genetic Markers for the Detection of DNA of Invasive Bighead and Silver Carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis and H. molitrix) in Environmental Water Samples from the United States , 2015, PloS one.

[37]  G. Moyer,et al.  History, applications, methodological issues and perspectives for the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) in marine and freshwater environments. , 2014, Revista de biologia tropical.

[38]  Hanlee P. Ji,et al.  Correction to High Sensitivity Detection and Quantitation of DNA Copy Number and Single Nucleotide Variants with Single Color Droplet Digital PCR , 2014, Analytical Chemistry.

[39]  Jesse A. Port,et al.  Using Environmental DNA to Census Marine Fishes in a Large Mesocosm , 2014, PloS one.

[40]  W. L. Chadderton,et al.  Environmental conditions influence eDNA persistence in aquatic systems. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[41]  K. McKelvey,et al.  Robust Detection of Rare Species Using Environmental DNA: The Importance of Primer Specificity , 2013, PloS one.

[42]  François Pompanon,et al.  Persistence of Environmental DNA in Freshwater Ecosystems , 2011, PloS one.