Overexposure of radiation therapy patients in Panama: problem recognition and follow-up measures.

This report summarizes and analyzes the responses of various organizations that provided assistance to the National Oncology Institute (Instituto Oncológico Nacional, ION) of Panama following the overexposure of 28 radiation therapy patients at the ION in late 2000 and early 2001. The report also looks at the long-term measures that were adopted at the ION in response to the overexposure incident, as well as implications that the incident has for other cancer treatment centers worldwide. In March 2001, the director of the ION was notified of serious overreactions in patients undergoing radiation therapy for cancer treatment. Of the 478 patients treated for pelvic cancers between August 2000 and March 2001, 3 of them had died, possibly from an overdose of radiation. In response, the Government of Panama invited international experts to carry out a full investigation of the situation. Medical physicists from the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) were among those invited. They ascertained that 56 patients treated with partially blocked teletherapy fields for cancers of the uterine cervix, endometrium, prostate, or rectum, had had their treatment times calculated using a computerized treatment planning system. PAHO's medical physicists calculated the absorbed doses received by the patients and found that, of these 56 patients, only 11 had been treated with acceptable errors of +/-5%. The doses received by 28 of the 56 patients had errors ranging from +10 to +105%. These are the patients identified by ION physicists as overexposed. Twenty-three of the 28 overexposed patients had died by September 2005, with at least 18 of the deaths being from radiation effects, mostly rectal complications. The clinical, psychological, and legal consequences of the overexposures crippled cancer treatments in Panama and prompted PAHO to assess radiation oncology practices in the countries of Latin American and the Caribbean. ION clinicians evaluated the outcome of 125 non-overexposed patients who had been treated in the same time period and for the same cancer sites as the overexposed patients. The clinicians uncovered a larger recurrence of cervical cancers than expected. The finding prompted PAHO to launch an initiative for the accreditation of radiation oncology centers in Latin America and the Caribbean, working in collaboration with professional societies for radiation oncologists, medical physicists, and radiotherapy technologists. The Latin American Association for Radiation Oncology (Asociación Latinoamericana de Terapia Radiante Oncológica) has established an accreditation commission. Accreditation will require that centers implement a comprehensive radiation oncology quality assurance program that follows international guidelines. Statistical data on patient outcomes will be collected in order to document needs in radiotherapy centers in Latin America and the Caribbean and to define future strategies for cancer treatment.

[1]  J. Cosset ESTRO Breur Gold Medal Award Lecture 2001: irradiation accidents-- lessons for oncology? , 2002, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  P. Rubin,et al.  RTOG Late Effects Working Group. Overview. Late Effects of Normal Tissues (LENT) scoring system. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  G. Starkschall,et al.  American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 53: quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning. , 1998, Medical physics.

[4]  J. Purdy,et al.  Radiation therapy alone in the treatment of carcinoma of uterine cervix I. Analysis of tumor recurrence , 1983, Cancer.

[5]  T. Pajak,et al.  Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  A. Amer,et al.  Clinical effects in a cohort of cancer patients overexposed during external beam pelvic radiotherapy. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  岩崎 民子 SOURCES AND EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION : United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes , 2002 .

[8]  Quantification of late complications after radiation therapy. , 2001 .

[9]  M. E. Young,et al.  DOSE TABLES FOR LINEAR RADIUM SOURCES CALCULATED BY AN ELECTRONIC COMPUTER. , 1964, The British journal of radiology.

[10]  R. Lanciano,et al.  Optimizing radiation parameters for cervical cancer. , 2000, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[11]  The radiation overexposure of radiotherapy patients in Panama 15 June 2001. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  J. Purdy,et al.  Correlation between radiation dose and tumor recurrence and complications in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: stages I and IIA. , 1979, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  H. Ishikawa,et al.  Analysis of recurrence of squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix after definitive radiation therapy alone: patterns of recurrence, latent periods, and prognosis. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  T. Johnson Commissioning and Quality Assurance of Computerized Planning Systems for Radiation Treatment of Cancer , 2007 .

[15]  Jacques Bernier,et al.  Late effects toxicity scoring: the SOMA scale , 1995 .

[16]  L. Brady,et al.  Failure patterns in gynecologic cancer. , 1986, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  H. Bartelink,et al.  Fractionation in radiotherapy. , 1994, Cancer treatment reviews.

[18]  J F Fowler,et al.  A modelled comparison of the effects of using different ways to compensate for missed treatment days in radiotherapy. , 1996, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[19]  H. Beck-Bornholdt,et al.  Quantification of late complications after radiation therapy. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  P. Grigsby,et al.  Carcinoma of the uterine cervix. I. Impact of prolongation of overall treatment time and timing of brachytherapy on outcome of radiation therapy. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  S. Zunino,et al.  Anatomic study of the pelvis in carcinoma of the uterine cervix as related to the box technique. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  A. Fyles,et al.  The effect of treatment duration in the local control of cervix cancer. , 1992, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[23]  F. Mettler,et al.  A 2-Year Medical Follow-Up of the Radiotherapy Accident in Costa Rica , 2001 .

[24]  A. Brahme,et al.  Principles and Practice of Radiation Oncology , 1992 .

[25]  LENT SOMA scales for all anatomic sites. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  G. Fletcher Textbook of radiotherapy , 1973 .

[27]  Robert J. Shalek,et al.  Determination of Absorbed Dose in a Patient Irradiated by Beams of X or Gamma Rays in Radiotherapy Procedures , 1977 .