Evaluation of the GLC2000 and NALC2005 land cover products for LAI retrieval over Canada

Land cover information is an important input parameter for retrieving key land surface biophysical parameters, such as leaf area index (LAI), often parameterized with geometrical-optical properties distinctive among land cover types. This paper presents a comparative assessment and evaluation of the 1 km Global Land Cover (GLC2000) and the 250 m North American Land Cover (NALC2005) over Canada. We used a 30 m Circa 2000 Land Cover from agricultural regions of Canada as a reference dataset. The comparative assessment and evaluation were made at six generalized class levels that were categorized based on relevance for parameterizations of key land surface biophysical parameter retrieval algorithms. The overall per-pixel agreement between the GLC2000 and the NALC2005 was 63.4%. The overall accuracies using the Circa 2000 reference data were 62.3% and 65.5% for the GLC2000 and NALC2005 datasets, respectively. Based on the improved version 2 University of Toronto LAI algorithm, up to a 42% difference in LAI estimation was noted over Canada due to differences in the two regional land cover datasets. This study assessed the performance of the newly produced NALC2005 product and presents, for the first time, the often overlooked land cover characterization impact on large scale LAI estimation.

[1]  Valéry Masson,et al.  ECOCLIMAP: a global database of land surface parameters at 1 km resolution , 2005 .

[2]  Yi Luo,et al.  A method for downscaling MODIS land channels to 250-m spatial resolution using adaptive regression and normalization , 2006, SPIE Remote Sensing.

[3]  Ranga B. Myneni,et al.  Analysis and optimization of the MODIS leaf area index algorithm retrievals over broadleaf forests , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Validation of the global land cover 2000 map , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Stanley H. Cohen,et al.  Design and Analysis , 2010 .

[6]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment , 2002 .

[7]  Ed B. Wiken Terrestrial ecozones of Canada , 1986 .

[8]  James R. Anderson,et al.  A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data , 1976 .

[9]  B. Leupen,et al.  Design and analysis , 1997 .

[10]  David J. Pannell,et al.  Conducting and delivering integrated research to influence land-use policy: salinity policy in Australia , 2009 .

[11]  O. Hagolle,et al.  LAI, fAPAR and fCover CYCLOPES global products derived from VEGETATION: Part 1: Principles of the algorithm , 2007 .

[12]  S. Running,et al.  Global products of vegetation leaf area and fraction absorbed PAR from year one of MODIS data , 2002 .

[13]  J. Pisek,et al.  Estimation of vegetation clumping index using MODIS BRDF data , 2011 .

[14]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  A note on procedures used for accuracy assessment in land cover maps derived from AVHRR data , 2000 .

[15]  D. Roy,et al.  An overview of MODIS Land data processing and product status , 2002 .

[16]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[17]  Ranga B. Myneni,et al.  Estimation of global leaf area index and absorbed par using radiative transfer models , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[18]  Martin Herold,et al.  Some challenges in global land cover mapping : An assessment of agreement and accuracy in existing 1 km datasets , 2008 .

[19]  J. Chen,et al.  Global mapping of foliage clumping index using multi-angular satellite data , 2005 .

[20]  Rasim Latifovic,et al.  Accuracy assessment using sub-pixel fractional error matrices of global land cover products derived from satellite data , 2004 .

[21]  Stephen V. Stehman,et al.  Design and Analysis for Thematic Map Accuracy Assessment: Fundamental Principles , 1998 .

[22]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Global land cover mapping from MODIS: algorithms and early results , 2002 .

[23]  E. E. Hardy,et al.  A Land Use and Land Cover Classification System for Use with Remote Sensor Data GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 964 , 2006 .

[24]  Jan Pisek,et al.  Algorithm for global leaf area index retrieval using satellite imagery , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[25]  Chandra Giri,et al.  A comparative analysis of the Global Land Cover 2000 and MODIS land cover data sets , 2005 .

[26]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data : principles and practices , 1998 .

[27]  Gregory Asner,et al.  Endmember bundles: a new approach to incorporating endmember variability into spectral mixture analysis , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[28]  R. Latifovic,et al.  Land cover mapping of North and Central America—Global Land Cover 2000 , 2004 .

[29]  Y. Knyazikhin,et al.  Validation and intercomparison of global Leaf Area Index products derived from remote sensing data , 2008 .