Valenced Comparisons

In this article, the authors show empirically that comparative advertisements can vary in terms of their valence, that is, whether respondents perceive them as positive (less derogatory) or negative (more derogatory) in their references to competition. In addition, the authors report findings from three studies that demonstrate that advertisements perceived as carrying more negative/derogatory references to competition result in more counterarguments, fewer support arguments, lower believability more associated perceived bias, and lower brand attitude scores than do advertisements perceived as more positive/nonderogatory in their competitive references. Tests of mediation suggest that the effectiveness of valenced comparisons is mediated by advertiser attributions that are more negative for negative comparisons. The authors discuss implications for designing more effective comparative advertisements.

[1]  P. R. Warshaw,et al.  Negating the effects of fear appeals in election campaigns. , 1985 .

[2]  Leandre R. Fabrigar,et al.  Conceptual and Methodological Issues in the Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion: A Reply to the Michigan State Critics , 1993 .

[3]  Daniel A. Powers,et al.  Statistical Methods for Categorical Data Analysis , 1999 .

[4]  E. Higgins,et al.  Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations : Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making , 1997 .

[5]  S. Ratneshwar,et al.  The Use of Comparative Advertising for Brand Positioning: Association versus Differentiation , 1991 .

[6]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change , 1978 .

[7]  Peter Wright,et al.  Persuasion Knowledge , 2022 .

[8]  Margaret C. Campbell.  When Attention-Getting Advertising Tactics Elicit Consumer Inferences of Manipulative Intent: The Importance of Balancing Benefits and Investments , 1995 .

[9]  Dhruv Grewal,et al.  Comparative versus Noncomparative Advertising: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[10]  C. Pechmann.  Do Consumers Overgeneralize One-Sided Comparative Price Claims, and Are More Stringent Regulations Needed? , 1996 .

[11]  S. Jain.  Positive versus negative comparative advertising , 1993 .

[12]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Suspicion and Dispositional Inference , 1993 .

[13]  M. Darby,et al.  Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud , 1973, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[14]  M. Pinto,et al.  Guilt appeals in advertising: what are their effects? , 1995, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  Durairaj Maheswaran,et al.  Comparative Versus Noncomparative Advertising: The Moderating Impact of Prepurchase Attribute Verifiability , 2000 .

[16]  E. Tory Higgins,et al.  Emotional experiences: The pains and pleasures of distinct regulatory systems. , 1996 .

[17]  David W. Stewart,et al.  The Effects of Comparative Advertising on Attention, Memory, and Purchase Intentions , 1990 .

[18]  John W. Payne,et al.  Factors Affecting the Impact of Negatively and Positively Framed Ad Messages , 1997 .