Comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional cytology for detection of cervical cancer precursors: a randomized controlled trial.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Marc Arbyn | L. Massuger | P. Klinkhamer | J. Bulten | M. Arbyn | Albertus G Siebers | Paul J J M Klinkhamer | Johanna M M Grefte | Leon F A G Massuger | Judith E M Vedder | Angelique Beijers-Broos | Johan Bulten | A. Siebers | J. Grefte | J. Vedder | Angelique Beijers-Broos
[1] M. Bibbo,et al. The revised Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnoses: report of the 1991 Bethesda workshop. , 1992, The Journal of reproductive medicine.
[2] A. Hanselaar,et al. Liquid‐based cervical cytology , 2003, Cancer.
[3] S. Kabawat,et al. Performance of a fluid-based, thin-layer papanicolaou smear method in the clinical setting of an independent laboratory and an outpatient screening population in New England. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[4] M Arbyn,et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for collecting samples for conventional and liquid‐based cytology * , 2007, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.
[5] N. Segnan,et al. European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening. Second Edition—Summary Document , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[6] D. Ashby,et al. Sample size for cluster randomized trials: effect of coefficient of variation of cluster size and analysis method. , 2006, International journal of epidemiology.
[7] Guillermo Marshall,et al. A comparison of single and combined visual, cytologic, and virologic tests as screening strategies in a region at high risk of cervical cancer. , 2003, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.
[8] Philippe Vielh,et al. Cross sectional study of conventional cervical smear, monolayer cytology, and human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[9] J. Obwegeser,et al. Does Liquid-Based Technology Really Improve Detection of Cervical Neoplasia? , 2001, Acta Cytologica.
[10] Sander Greenland,et al. Model-based estimation of relative risks and other epidemiologic measures in studies of common outcomes and in case-control studies. , 2004, American journal of epidemiology.
[11] J. Dillner,et al. Chapter 9: Clinical applications of HPV testing: a summary of meta-analyses. , 2006, Vaccine.
[12] G. Rose,et al. The impact of converting to liquid-based cervical cytology in a military population. , 2005, Gynecologic oncology.
[13] Iruka N. Okeke,et al. Vibrio cholerae O1 from Accra, Ghana carrying a class 2 integron and the SXT element , 2008, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.
[14] D. Davey,et al. ThinPrep® Pap Test™ , 1999, Cancer.
[15] A. Farnsworth. Liquid‐based cytology: an Australian experience * , 2003, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.
[16] Nereo Segnan,et al. Accuracy of liquid based versus conventional cytology: overall results of new technologies for cervical cancer screening: randomised controlled trial , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[17] G. Schoolnik,et al. Biofilm Acts as a Microenvironment for Plankton‐Associated Vibrio cholerae in the Aquatic Environment of Bangladesh , 2007, Microbiology and immunology.
[18] M. Casparie,et al. Pathology Databanking and Biobanking in The Netherlands, a Central Role for PALGA, the Nationwide Histopathology and Cytopathology Data Network and Archive , 2007, Cellular oncology : the official journal of the International Society for Cellular Oncology.
[19] J. Dillner,et al. Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: A meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia , 2004 .
[20] Birger Jansson,et al. Random Number Generators , 1967 .
[21] D. Sherer,et al. Performance of ThinPrep liquid-based cervical cytology in comparison with conventionally prepared Papanicolaou smears: a quantitative survey. , 2003, Gynecologic oncology.
[22] A. Morabia,et al. Efficacy of a liquid‐based thin layer method for cervical cancer screening in a population with a low incidence of cervical cancer , 2000 .
[23] H. Kitchener,et al. The comparative diagnostic accuracy of conventional and liquid‐based cytology in a colposcopic setting , 2005, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
[24] R. Luff,et al. Comparative analysis of conventional Papanicolaou tests and a fluid-based thin-layer method. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[25] D. Schledermann,et al. Significance of atypia in conventional Papanicolaou smears and liquid‐based cytology: a follow‐up study , 2004, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.
[26] Thomas C Wright,et al. Direct comparison of liquid‐based and conventional cytology in a South African screening trial , 2006, International journal of cancer.
[27] R. M. Austin,et al. The promise and risk of a new technology , 1998, Cancer.
[28] Jacalyn L. Papillo,et al. Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap Test in Clinical Practice , 1998, Acta Cytologica.
[29] J. Zhang,et al. What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. , 1998, JAMA.
[30] Y. Takeda,et al. Emergence of Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Strains of Vibrio cholerae O1 Biotype El Tor among Hospitalized Patients with Cholera in Calcutta, India , 2001, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
[31] M. Mukai,et al. Papanicolaou tests and molecular analyses using new fluid-based specimen collection technology in 3000 Japanese women , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.
[32] A. Saha,et al. Liquid-based cytology , 2006, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care.
[33] Xiaonan Xue,et al. Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes. , 2003, American journal of epidemiology.
[34] W. Ryd,et al. Liquid‐based cytology versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in an organized screening program , 2007, Cancer.
[35] D J Zahniser,et al. Homogeneous sampling accounts for the increased diagnostic accuracy using the ThinPrep Processor. , 1994, American journal of clinical pathology.
[36] S. Selvaggi,et al. Use of the Thin Prep® Pap Test™ in clinical practice , 1999, Diagnostic cytopathology.
[37] A. Cheung,et al. Liquid‐based cytology and conventional cervical smears , 2003 .
[38] M. Duggan,et al. Comparative study of the ThinPrep Pap test and conventional cytology results in a Canadian cohort , 2006, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.
[39] I. Eltoum,et al. Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. A follow-up study of conventional and liquid-based preparations in a high-risk population. , 2003, American journal of clinical pathology.
[40] S. Faruque,et al. Molecular epidemiology of toxigenic Vibrio cholerae in Bangladesh studied by numerical analysis of rRNA gene restriction patterns , 1995, Journal of clinical microbiology.
[41] A. Williams. Liquid‐based cytology and conventional smears compared over two 12‐month periods , 2006, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.
[42] Jack Cuzick,et al. How to evaluate emerging technologies in cervical cancer screening? , 2009, International journal of cancer.
[43] L. Irwig,et al. Effect of study design and quality on unsatisfactory rates, cytology classifications, and accuracy in liquid-based versus conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review , 2006, The Lancet.
[44] D. Schledermann,et al. Improvement of diagnostic accuracy and screening conditions with liquid‐based cytology , 2006, Diagnostic cytopathology.
[45] Marc Arbyn,et al. Liquid Compared With Conventional Cervical Cytology: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2008, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[46] L. Massuger,et al. Cytologic Detection of Cervical Abnormalities Using Liquid-Based Compared With Conventional Cytology: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2008, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[47] C. Destouni,et al. Experience with a Thin-Layer, Liquid-Based Cervical Cytologic Screening Method , 2003, Acta Cytologica.
[48] B. Hoelund. Implementation of liquid‐based cytology in the screening programme against cervical cancer in the County of Funen, Denmark, and status for the first year , 2003, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.
[49] N. Segnan,et al. European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening. Europe against cancer programme. , 1993, European journal of cancer.