Ground‐based validation of CALIPSO observations of dust and smoke in the Cape Verde region

Ground‐based Raman lidar measurements during the second Saharan Mineral Dust Experiment (SAMUM‐2) in 2008 were used for validation of measurements of the lidar aboard the Cloud‐Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) satellite within the dusty environment of the Cape Verde region. SAMUM‐2 featured two one‐month campaigns in January/February and May/June 2008 to cover different modes of aerosol transport to the tropical Atlantic: dust from northern Africa and biomass‐burning smoke from western Africa during winter, and pure Saharan dust during summer. During the investigated time period, 33 CALIPSO overflights occurred at a distance of less than 500 km from the location of the ground‐based lidar. Fifteen out of these 33 cases were found suitable for comparing the findings of the two instruments. The parameters for this comparison are the particle backscatter coefficient at 532 and 1064 nm, the extinction coefficient, the lidar ratio (aerosol type), and the particle depolarization ratio at 532 nm, as well as the backscatter‐related Ångström exponent for the wavelength pair 532/1064 nm. Best agreement was found for the 532 nm backscatter coefficient, while the 532 nm extinction coefficient is underestimated by up to 30%. The latter is due to the use of an effective dust lidar ratio that gives reliable backscatter coefficients but is not suitable to transform these to extinction coefficients. CALIPSO particle depolarization ratios provided in the current (version 3.01) aerosol profile product were found to be affected by a computing error and should be calculated from the perpendicular and total particle backscatter coefficients provided in the same data file. CALIPSO aerosol classification was found to be mostly correct but a demand for homogeneous aerosol layers could improve the retrieval. Suggestions for the improvement of the CALIPSO retrieval by introducing iterative procedures are provided.

[1]  A. Ångström.  The parameters of atmospheric turbidity , 1964 .

[2]  J. Klett.  Stable analytical inversion solution for processing lidar returns. , 1981, Applied optics.

[3]  F. G. Fernald.  Analysis of atmospheric lidar observations: some comments. , 1984, Applied optics.

[4]  S. Young,et al.  Analysis of lidar backscatter profiles in optically thin clouds. , 1995, Applied optics.

[5]  Albert Ansmann,et al.  Scanning 6-Wavelength 11-Channel Aerosol Lidar , 2000 .

[6]  M. McCormick,et al.  Development of global aerosol models using cluster analysis of Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) measurements , 2005 .

[7]  C. Weitkamp.  Lidar, Range-Resolved Optical Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere , 2005 .

[8]  Albert Ansmann,et al.  Lidar and Atmospheric Aerosol Particles , 2005 .

[9]  T. Kovacs.  Comparing MODIS and AERONET aerosol optical depth at varying separation distances to assess ground‐based validation strategies for spaceborne lidar , 2006 .

[10]  David M. Winker,et al.  Airborne validation of spatial properties measured by the CALIPSO lidar , 2007 .

[11]  A. Ansmann,et al.  Aerosol-type-dependent lidar ratios observed with Raman lidar , 2007 .

[12]  D. Winker,et al.  A height resolved global view of dust aerosols from the first year CALIPSO lidar measurements , 2008 .

[13]  David M. Winker,et al.  CALIPSO lidar observations of the optical properties of Saharan dust: A case study of long‐range transport , 2008 .

[14]  Andreas Macke,et al.  Saharan dust transport and deposition towards the tropical northern Atlantic , 2008 .

[15]  Mark A. Vaughan,et al.  The Retrieval of Profiles of Particulate Extinction from Cloud-Aerosol Lidar Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) Data: Algorithm Description , 2009 .

[16]  Ilan Koren,et al.  Patterns of North African dust transport over the Atlantic: winter vs. summer, based on CALIPSO first year data , 2009 .

[17]  Albert Ansmann,et al.  Vertically resolved separation of dust and smoke over Cape Verde using multiwavelength Raman and polarization lidars during Saharan Mineral Dust Experiment 2008 , 2009 .

[18]  D. Winker,et al.  CALIPSO Lidar Description and Performance Assessment , 2009 .

[19]  V. Freudenthaler,et al.  Depolarization ratio profiling at several wavelengths in pure Saharan dust during SAMUM 2006 , 2009 .

[20]  David M. Winker,et al.  Fully Automated Detection of Cloud and Aerosol Layers in the CALIPSO Lidar Measurements , 2009 .

[21]  D. Winker,et al.  The CALIPSO Automated Aerosol Classification and Lidar Ratio Selection Algorithm , 2009 .

[22]  Jaakko Kukkonen,et al.  Comparison of CALIOP level 2 aerosol subtypes to aerosol types derived from AERONET inversion data , 2009 .

[23]  S. Tao,et al.  Comparing MODIS and AERONET aerosol optical depth over China , 2009 .

[24]  D. Balis,et al.  Validation of CALIPSO space-borne-derived attenuated backscatter coefficient profiles using a ground-based lidar in Athens, Greece , 2009 .

[25]  Albert Ansmann,et al.  Vertical profiling of Saharan dust with Raman lidars and airborne HSRL in southern Morocco during SAMUM , 2009 .

[26]  L. Mona,et al.  One year of CNR-IMAA multi-wavelength Raman lidar measurements in coincidence with CALIPSO overpasses: Level 1 products comparison , 2009 .

[27]  D. Winker,et al.  Overview of the CALIPSO Mission and CALIOP Data Processing Algorithms , 2009 .

[28]  V. Freudenthaler,et al.  EARLINET correlative measurements for CALIPSO: First intercomparison results , 2010 .

[29]  Lorraine A. Remer,et al.  Using Airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar Data to Evaluate Combined Active Plus Passive Retrievals of Aerosol Extinction Profiles , 2010 .

[30]  T. Nagai,et al.  Backscattering linear depolarization ratio measurements of mineral, sea-salt, and ammonium sulfate particles simulated in a laboratory chamber. , 2010, Applied optics.

[31]  S. Loaëc,et al.  Simultaneous observations of lower tropospheric continental aerosols with a ground‐based, an airborne, and the spaceborne CALIOP lidar system , 2010 .

[32]  Albert Ansmann,et al.  Size matters: Influence of multiple scattering on CALIPSO light‐extinction profiling in desert dust , 2010 .

[33]  David M. Winker,et al.  Assessment of the CALIPSO Lidar 532 nm attenuated backscatter calibration using the NASA LaRC airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar , 2010 .

[34]  R. Draxler.  HYSPLIT (HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory) Model access via NOAA ARL READY Website , 2010 .

[35]  S. Martin,et al.  Transport of North African dust from the Bodélé depression to the Amazon Basin: a case study , 2010 .

[36]  D. Winker,et al.  THE CALIPSO CLOUD AND AEROSOL DISCRIMINATION : VERSION 3 ALGORITHM AND TEST RESULTS , 2010 .

[37]  D. Winker,et al.  Strategies for Improved CALIPSO Aerosol Optical Depth Estimates , 2010 .

[38]  M. Tjernström,et al.  The vertical distribution of thin features over the Arctic analysed from CALIPSO observations , 2011 .

[39]  D. Ie,et al.  Profiling of Saharan dust and biomass-burning smoke with multiwavelength polarization Raman lidar at Cape Verde , 2011 .

[40]  B. Holben,et al.  An Accuracy Assessment of the CALIOP/CALIPSO Version 2/Version 3 Daytime Aerosol Extinction Product Based on a Detailed Multi-Sensor, Multi-Platform Case Study , 2011 .

[41]  R. Ferrare,et al.  Aerosol classification using airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar measurements – methodology and examples , 2011 .

[42]  David M. Winker,et al.  Intercomparison of column aerosol optical depths from CALIPSO and MODIS-Aqua , 2011 .

[43]  D. Winker,et al.  Effective lidar ratios of dense dust layers over North Africa derived from the CALIOP measurements , 2011 .

[44]  Albert Ansmann,et al.  Profiling of Saharan dust and biomass-burning smoke with multiwavelength polarization Raman lidar at Cape Verde , 2011 .

[45]  The vertical distribution of thin features over the Arctic analysed from CALIPSO observations Part II: Aerosols , 2011 .

[46]  Albert Ansmann,et al.  Saharan Mineral Dust Experiments SAMUM–1 and SAMUM–2: what have we learned? , 2011 .

[47]  Albert Ansmann,et al.  Characterization of the planetary boundary layer during SAMUM-2 by means of lidar measurements , 2011 .

[48]  Jens Redemann,et al.  The comparison of MODIS-Aqua (C5) and CALIOP (V2 & V3) aerosol optical depth , 2011 .

[49]  Charles A. Trepte,et al.  Comparison of CALIPSO aerosol optical depth retrievals to AERONET measurements, and a climatology for the lidar ratio of dust , 2012 .

[50]  Ellsworth J. Welton,et al.  Evaluating nighttime CALIOP 0.532 μm aerosol optical depth and extinction coefficient retrievals , 2012 .

[51]  P. Di Girolamo,et al.  Characterization of the planetary boundary layer height and structure by Raman lidar: comparison of different approaches , 2013 .

[52]  D. Winker,et al.  Looking through the haze: evaluating the CALIPSO level 2 aerosol optical depth using airborne high spectral resolution lidar data , 2014 .