Fertility-preserving options for cervical cancer.

Childbearing is one of the most important life goals for many women, and fertility preservation is a very important factor in the overall quality of life of cancer survivors. Cervical cancer frequently affects young women; because some women tend to delay childbearing, fertility preservation must be considered when treatment options are discussed. Over the past decade, the radical trachelectomy procedure has become a well established fertility-preserving option for young women with early-stage cancer; this procedure is associated with low morbidity, good oncologic outcome, and a high proportion of pregnancies that reach the third trimester and babies that are delivered at term. This article will review available literature on the vaginal radical trachelectomy procedure and data from other surgical approaches, such as the abdominal radical trachelectomy. In addition, the potential future application of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by fertility-preserving surgery in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer will be examined. Finally, ultraconservative surgical approaches (eg, conization alone with or without laparoscopic lymphadenectomy) in very early-stage disease will be discussed.

[1]  G. Priore,et al.  Abdominal radical trachelectomy: a fertility‐preserving option for women with early cervical cancer , 2005, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[2]  V. Berghella,et al.  Cerclage for prevention of preterm birth in women with a short cervix found on transvaginal ultrasound examination: a randomized trial. , 2004, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  J. Crane Pregnancy Outcome After Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure: A Systematic Review , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  Chin-Jung Wang,et al.  Laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for stage Ib1 cervical cancer. , 2003, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[5]  J. Schlaerth,et al.  Radical trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with uterine preservation in the treatment of cervical cancer. , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  P. Mathevet,et al.  [Extended trachelectomy relapse: plea for patient involvement in the medical decision]. , 2002, Bulletin du cancer.

[7]  E. Alexopoulos,et al.  Pregnancy following radical trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for Stage I cervical adenocarcinoma , 2002, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[8]  J. Shepherd,et al.  Isthmic stenosis following radical trachelectomy , 2002, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[9]  F. Landoni,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery versus exclusive radiotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell cervical cancer: results from the Italian multicenter randomized study. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  P. Rose,et al.  Radical abdominal trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with uterine conservation and subsequent pregnancy in the treatment of early invasive cervical cancer. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  J. Reiber,et al.  Tumor diameter and volume assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of outcome for invasive cervical cancer. , 2001, Gynecologic oncology.

[12]  T. Mould,et al.  Radical trachelectomy in early stage carcinoma of the cervix: outcome as judged by recurrence and fertility rates , 2001, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[13]  M. Plante,et al.  Pregnancies after radical vaginal trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. , 1998, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  E. Thom,et al.  The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.