Visual attractiveness is leaky: the asymmetrical relationship between face and hair

Predicting personality is crucial when communicating with people. It has been revealed that the perceived attractiveness or beauty of the face is a cue. As shown in the well-known “what is beautiful is good” stereotype, perceived attractiveness is often associated with desirable personality. Although such research on attractiveness used mainly the face isolated from other body parts, the face is not always seen in isolation in the real world. Rather, it is surrounded by one’s hairstyle, and is perceived as a part of total presence. In human vision, perceptual organization/integration occurs mostly in a bottom up, task-irrelevant fashion. This raises an intriguing possibility that task-irrelevant stimulus that is perceptually integrated with a target may influence our affective evaluation. In such a case, there should be a mutual influence between attractiveness perception of the face and surrounding hair, since they are assumed to share strong and unique perceptual organization. In the current study, we examined the influence of a task-irrelevant stimulus on our attractiveness evaluation, using face and hair as stimuli. The results revealed asymmetrical influences in the evaluation of one while ignoring the other. When hair was task-irrelevant, it still affected attractiveness of the face, but only if the hair itself had never been evaluated by the same evaluator. On the other hand, the face affected the hair regardless of whether the face itself was evaluated before. This has intriguing implications on the asymmetry between face and hair, and perceptual integration between them in general. Together with data from a post hoc questionnaire, it is suggested that both implicit non-selective and explicit selective processes contribute to attractiveness evaluation. The findings provide an understanding of attractiveness perception in real-life situations, as well as a new paradigm to reveal unknown implicit aspects of information integration for emotional judgment.

[1]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Faces are represented holistically in the human occipito-temporal cortex , 2006, NeuroImage.

[2]  W. R. Garner.  The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[3]  J. Graham,et al.  The effects of cosmetics on person perception , 1981, International journal of cosmetic science.

[4]  H. Egeth.  Parallel versus serial processes in multidimensional stimulus discrimination , 1966 .

[5]  R. Zajonc.  Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[6]  R. Bornstein,et al.  Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Roles of familiarity and novelty in visual preference judgments are segregated across object categories , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  G. Rhodes.  The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[9]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Reaction time in an oddity task: responding to the "different" element of three-light display. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  Randy Thornhill,et al.  Human female orgasm and mate fluctuating asymmetry , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[12]  K. Grammer,et al.  Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. , 1994, Journal of comparative psychology.

[13]  E. Berscheid,et al.  What is beautiful is good. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  James M. Kilner,et al.  Brain systems for assessing facial attractiveness , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Temporal isolation of neural processes underlying face preference decisions , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affect, cognition, and awareness: affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  B. Duchaine,et al.  The Role of Holistic Processing in Judgments of Facial Attractiveness , 2008, Perception.

[18]  R. Kowner,et al.  Facial asymmetry and attractiveness judgment in developmental perspective. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  The Impact of Physically Attractive Models on Advertising Evaluations , 1977 .

[20]  A. Furnham,et al.  The influence of skin tone, hair length, and hair colour on ratings of women's physical attractiveness, health and fertility. , 2008, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[21]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  An illusion of memory: false recognition influenced by unconscious perception , 1989 .

[22]  R. Bornstein.  Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. , 1989 .

[23]  T. Watanabe,et al.  Effect of irrelevant differences as a function of the relations between relevant and irrelevant dimensions in the same-different task. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  J. Langlois,et al.  Attractive Faces Are Only Average , 1990 .

[25]  Shannon Stock,et al.  Cosmetics as a Feature of the Extended Human Phenotype: Modulation of the Perception of Biologically Important Facial Signals , 2011, PloS one.

[26]  T Watanabe.  Effect of irrelevant differences as a function of the relations between relevant and irrelevant dimensions in the same-different task. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  D. Perrett,et al.  Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness , 1998, Nature.

[28]  G. Kanizsa,et al.  Organization in Vision: Essays on Gestalt Perception , 1979 .

[29]  G. Clore,et al.  Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. , 1983 .

[30]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[31]  Amy L. Thomas,et al.  The neural response to facial attractiveness. , 2009, Neuropsychology.

[32]  Susanne Huber,et al.  Gaze behavior in analytical and holistic face processing , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[33]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[34]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[35]  F. Mast,et al.  Featural, Configural, and Holistic Face-Processing Strategies Evoke Different Scan Patterns , 2009, Perception.

[36]  D. Perrett,et al.  Beauty in a smile: the role of medial orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractiveness , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  G. Elder.  Appearance and education in marriage mobility. , 1969, American sociological review.

[38]  D. Ariely,et al.  Beautiful Faces Have Variable Reward Value fMRI and Behavioral Evidence , 2001, Neuron.

[39]  Stefan Fruehauf.  Perceiving And Remembering Faces , 2016 .