Toward best practice in Human Machine Interface design for older drivers: A review of current design guidelines.

Older adults are the fastest growing segment of the driving population. While there is a strong emphasis for older people to maintain their mobility, the safety of older drivers is a serious community concern. Frailty and declines in a range of age-related sensory, cognitive, and physical impairments can place older drivers at an increased risk of crash-related injuries and death. A number of studies have indicated that in-vehicle technologies such as Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and In-Vehicle Information Systems (IVIS) may provide assistance to older drivers. However, these technologies will only benefit older drivers if their design is congruent with the complex needs and diverse abilities of this driving cohort. The design of ADAS and IVIS is largely informed by automotive Human Machine Interface (HMI) guidelines. However, it is unclear to what extent the declining sensory, cognitive and physical capabilities of older drivers are addressed in the current guidelines. This paper provides a review of key current design guidelines for IVIS and ADAS with respect to the extent they address age-related changes in functional capacities. The review revealed that most of the HMI guidelines do not address design issues related to older driver impairments. In fact, in many guidelines driver age and sensory cognitive and physical impairments are not mentioned at all and where reference is made, it is typically very broad. Prescriptive advice on how to actually design a system so that it addresses the needs and limitations of older drivers is not provided. In order for older drivers to reap the full benefits that in-vehicle technology can afford, it is critical that further work establish how older driver limitations and capabilities can be supported by the system design process, including their inclusion into HMI design guidelines.

[1]  Maryvonne Dejeammes,et al.  AGING PROCESS AND SAFETY ENHANCEMENT OF CAR OCCUPANTS , 1996 .

[2]  S J Bolanowski,et al.  The effects of aging on information-processing channels in the sense of touch: I. Absolute sensitivity. , 1994, Somatosensory & motor research.

[3]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Division of attention: Age differences on a visually presented memory task , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[4]  J. Charlton,et al.  Behavioural adaptation and older drivers , 2013 .

[5]  Paul E Green.  Driver Interface Safety and Usability Standards: An Overview , 2009 .

[6]  Michael Sivak,et al.  Recent Changes in the Age Composition of U.S. Drivers: Implications for the Extent, Safety, and Environmental Consequences of Personal Transportation , 2011, Traffic injury prevention.

[7]  A Stevens.  European approaches to principles, codes, guidelines, and checklists for in-vehicle HMI , 2008 .

[8]  B. Fildes,et al.  Vehicle crashworthiness and the older motorist , 2003, Ageing and Society.

[9]  G E Stelmach,et al.  Cognitive-Motor Abilities of the Elderly Driver , 1992, Human factors.

[10]  B. Fildes,et al.  Distraction and the Older Driver , 2009 .

[11]  R. West,et al.  Everyday memory performance across the life span: effects of age and noncognitive individual differences. , 1992, Psychology and aging.

[12]  Dale Andrea,et al.  Vehicle Safety and Older Occupants , 2002 .

[13]  J Meyer.  PERSONAL VEHICLE TRANSPORTATION. IN: TECHNOLOGY FOR ADAPTIVE AGING , 2004 .

[14]  Celia B. Fisher,et al.  Aging and Executive Function Skills: An Examination of a Community-Dwelling Older Adult Population , 1997, Perceptual and motor skills.

[15]  Jonathan Dobres,et al.  Utilising psychophysical techniques to investigate the effects of age, typeface design, size and display polarity on glance legibility , 2016, Ergonomics.

[16]  E. Braver,et al.  Fragility versus excessive crash involvement as determinants of high death rates per vehicle-mile of travel among older drivers. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  Sjaanie Narelle Koppel,et al.  Older Drivers, Crashes and Injuries , 2011, Traffic injury prevention.

[18]  Joachim Meyer.  Designing In-Vehicle Technologies for Older Drivers , 2014 .

[19]  Marjan P. Hagenzieker,et al.  Effects of In-Car Support on Mental Workload and Driving Performance of Older Drivers , 2009, Hum. Factors.

[20]  Brenda Vrkljan,et al.  Advancements in vehicular technology: potential implications for the older driver , 2005 .

[21]  Sjaanie Narelle Koppel,et al.  Epidemiology of older driver crashes - Identifying older driver risk factors and exposure patterns , 2006 .

[22]  Peter Klavora,et al.  SENIOR DRIVERS: AN OVERVIEW OF PROBLEMS AND INTERVENTION STRATEGIES , 2002 .

[23]  Cgb Mitchell,et al.  THE VALUE OF INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS TO ELDERLY AND DISABLED TRAVELLERS , 1998 .

[24]  John F. Corso,et al.  Aging Sensory Systems and Perception , 1981 .

[25]  A Stevens,et al.  DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR SAFETY OF IN-VEHICLE INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 2002 .

[26]  D C Viano,et al.  Involvement of older drivers in multivehicle side-impact crashes. , 1990, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  Claes Tingvall,et al.  INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS: SAFETY AND HUMAN FACTORS ISSUES , 2001 .

[28]  M K Janke,et al.  AGE-RELATED DISABILITIES THAT MAY IMPAIR DRIVING AND THEIR ASSESSMENT: LITERATURE REVIEW. , 1994 .

[29]  Sjaan Koppel,et al.  Car Licensing Trends of the Babyboomer Cohort (b. 1946–1965) Compared to Earlier Birth Cohorts: Effects on the Driving Population in the State of Victoria, Australia , 2015, Traffic injury prevention.

[30]  W. Brouwer,et al.  Age differences in divided attention in a simulated driving task. , 1988, Journal of gerontology.

[31]  P F Waller,et al.  The Older Driver , 1991, Human factors.

[32]  Joseph F. Coughlin,et al.  In-vehicle technology for self-driving cars: Advantages and challenges for aging drivers , 2014 .

[33]  Lisa J. Molnar,et al.  Has the Time Come for Older Driver Vehicle , 2012 .

[34]  T. Salthouse.  Selective review of cognitive aging , 2010, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.