Predicting antibody complementarity determining region structures without classification.

Antibodies are used extensively in medical and biological research. Their complementarity determining regions (CDRs) define the majority of their antigen binding functionality. CDR structures have been intensively studied and classified (canonical structures). Here we show that CDR structure prediction is no different from the standard loop structure prediction problem and predict them without classification. FREAD, a successful database loop prediction technique, is able to produce accurate predictions for all CDR loops (0.81, 0.42, 0.96, 0.98, 0.88 and 2.25 Å RMSD for CDR-L1 to CDR-H3). In order to overcome the relatively poor predictions of CDR-H3, we developed two variants of FREAD, one focused on sequence similarity (FREAD-S) and another which includes contact information (ConFREAD). Both of the methods improve accuracy for CDR-H3 to 1.34 Å and 1.23 Å respectively. The FREAD variants are also tested on homology models and compared to RosettaAntibody (CDR-H3 prediction on models: 1.98 and 2.62 Å for ConFREAD and RosettaAntibody respectively). CDRs are known to change their structural conformations upon binding the antigen. Traditional CDR classifications are based on sequence similarity and do not account for such environment changes. Using a set of antigen-free and antigen-bound structures, we compared our FREAD variants. ConFREAD which includes contact information successfully discriminates the bound and unbound CDR structures and achieves an accuracy of 1.35 Å for bound structures of CDR-H3.

[1]  I. Wilson,et al.  Structural evidence for induced fit as a mechanism for antibody-antigen recognition. , 1994, Science.

[2]  Paul A. Ramsland,et al.  Diverse binding site structures revealed in homology models of polyreactive immunoglobulins , 1997, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[3]  R. Samudrala,et al.  An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  Jiří Novotný,et al.  Structure of antibody hypervariable loops reproduced by a conformational search algorithm , 1988, Nature.

[5]  A. Pavlou,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies market , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[6]  K. Rao,et al.  Maturation of an antibody response is governed by modulations in flexibility of the antigen-combining site. , 2000, Immunity.

[7]  A. Lesk,et al.  Standard conformations for the canonical structures of immunoglobulins. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  T L Blundell,et al.  FUGUE: sequence-structure homology recognition using environment-specific substitution tables and structure-dependent gap penalties. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  Toward high‐resolution homology modeling of antibody Fv regions and application to antibody–antigen docking , 2009, Proteins.

[10]  D. Davies,et al.  Structural basis of antibody function. , 1983, Annual review of immunology.

[11]  Sebastian Kelm,et al.  MEDELLER: homology-based coordinate generation for membrane proteins , 2010, Bioinform..

[12]  Paolo Marcatili,et al.  PIGS: automatic prediction of antibody structures , 2008, Bioinform..

[13]  B. David Kingery,et al.  ABGEN: A Knowledge-Based Automated Approach for Antibody Structure Modeling , 1996, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  A. Murzin,et al.  The 2.0-A resolution crystal structure of a trimeric antibody fragment with noncognate VH-VL domain pairs shows a rearrangement of VH CDR3. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Benjamin D. Sellers,et al.  Energy-based analysis and prediction of the orientation between light- and heavy-chain antibody variable domains. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  A R Rees,et al.  WAM: an improved algorithm for modelling antibodies on the WEB. , 2000, Protein engineering.

[17]  Tim J. P. Hubbard,et al.  Data growth and its impact on the SCOP database: new developments , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[18]  C Kooperberg,et al.  Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  B. Honig,et al.  A hierarchical approach to all‐atom protein loop prediction , 2004, Proteins.

[20]  A. Sali,et al.  Modeling of loops in protein structures , 2000, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[21]  J. Bajorath,et al.  Comparison of an antibody model with an X‐ray structure: The variable fragment of BR96 , 1996, Proteins.

[22]  Dinakar M Salunke,et al.  Differential epitope positioning within the germline antibody paratope enhances promiscuity in the primary immune response. , 2006, Immunity.

[23]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  H3‐rules: identification of CDR‐H3 structures in antibodies , 1999, FEBS letters.

[24]  Tanja Kortemme,et al.  Multi‐constraint computational design suggests that native sequences of germline antibody H3 loops are nearly optimal for conformational flexibility , 2009, Proteins.

[25]  A. Lesk,et al.  Canonical structures for the hypervariable regions of immunoglobulins. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  M. Karplus,et al.  Prediction of the folding of short polypeptide segments by uniform conformational sampling , 1987, Biopolymers.

[27]  Tom L. Blundell,et al.  Ulla: a program for calculating environment-specific amino acid substitution tables , 2009, Bioinform..

[28]  I. Wilson,et al.  An Insertion Mutation That Distorts Antibody Binding Site Architecture Enhances Function of a Human Antibody , 2011, mBio.

[29]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Data Deposition and Annotation at the Worldwide Protein Data Bank , 2009, Molecular biotechnology.

[30]  A Tramontano,et al.  Antibody modeling: implications for engineering and design. , 2000, Methods.

[31]  R. Poljak,et al.  Structural features of the reactions between antibodies and protein antigens , 1995, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[32]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Automated classification of antibody complementarity determining region 3 of the heavy chain (H3) loops into canonical forms and its application to protein structure prediction. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  Gary Walsh,et al.  Biopharmaceutical benchmarks 2006 , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[34]  Frances M. G. Pearl,et al.  The CATH domain structure database: new protocols and classification levels give a more comprehensive resource for exploring evolution , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[35]  Z. Weng,et al.  ZDOCK: An initial‐stage protein‐docking algorithm , 2003, Proteins.

[36]  C. MacKenzie,et al.  Germline antibody recognition of distinct carbohydrate epitopes , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[37]  E. Myers,et al.  Basic local alignment search tool. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  Andrew C. R. Martin,et al.  Analysis and prediction of VH/VL packing in antibodies. , 2010, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[39]  S. Prewitt,et al.  Evidence for structural plasticity of heavy chain complementarity-determining region 3 in antibody-ssDNA recognition. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[40]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  Structural families in loops of homologous proteins: automatic classification, modelling and application to antibodies. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  R C Stevens,et al.  Conformational effects in biological catalysis: an antibody-catalyzed oxy-cope rearrangement. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[42]  David Baker,et al.  Protein Structure Prediction Using Rosetta , 2004, Numerical Computer Methods, Part D.

[43]  Jérôme Lane,et al.  IMGT®, the international ImMunoGeneTics information system® , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[44]  Peter G Schultz,et al.  Structural evidence for substrate strain in antibody catalysis , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  Roland L Dunbrack,et al.  Outcome of a workshop on applications of protein models in biomedical research. , 2009, Structure.

[46]  A. Rees,et al.  Modelling of the combining sites of three anti‐lysozyme monoclonal antibodies and of the complex between one of the antibodies and its epitope. , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[47]  Peter G Schultz,et al.  Structural plasticity and the evolution of antibody affinity and specificity. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[48]  R C Stevens,et al.  A comparative analysis of the immunological evolution of antibody 28B4. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[49]  R C Stevens,et al.  Structural insights into the evolution of an antibody combining site. , 1997, Science.

[50]  Roland L. Dunbrack,et al.  A new clustering of antibody CDR loop conformations. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[51]  R L Stanfield,et al.  Antibody-antigen interactions: new structures and new conformational changes. , 1994, Current opinion in structural biology.

[52]  A C Martin,et al.  Modeling antibody hypervariable loops: a combined algorithm. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  C. Deane,et al.  CODA: A combined algorithm for predicting the structurally variable regions of protein models , 2001, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[54]  M. DePristo,et al.  Ab initio construction of polypeptide fragments: Efficient generation of accurate, representative ensembles , 2003, Proteins.