Spatial analysis of radiometric fractions from high-resolution multispectral imagery for modelling individual tree crown and forest canopy structure and health

Research was conducted in a forest adjacent to an abandoned acid mine tailings site to assess forest structural health using high spatial and spectral resolution digital camera imagery. Conventional approaches to this problem involve the use image spectral information, basic spectral transformations, or occasionally spatial transformations of image brightness. This research introduces fractional textures and semivariance analysis of image fractions. They were integrated with conventional image measures in stepwise multiple regression modelling of forest structure (canopy and crown closure, stem density, tree height, crown size) and health (a visual stress index). The goal was to conduct a relative comparison of the potential of the various image variable types in modelling of forest structure and health. Analysis was conducted for both canopy (crowns and shadows) and individual tree crown sample data sets extracted from 10 nm bandwidth spectral bands at three resolutions (0.25, 0.5, 1.0 m). Spatial transformations (texture, semivariogram range) of image brightness (DN) and image fractions (IF) were consistently the most significant and first entered variables in the best models of the forest parameters. At the canopy-scale, despite a limited number of available plots (6), stable models were produced that demonstrated the potential for spatially transformed variables. Semivariogram range explained 88% of the total variation of 9 of the 18 models and represented 56% of the variables used in all models while texture variables explained 51% of model variance in 8 of the 18 models and represented 40% of the variables used. At the tree crown scale (n=31), 88% of the total variation of six of eight models was explained by texture variables and 6% by semivariogram variables. DN and IF variables that were not spatially transformed contributed little to the models at both scales. They represented 4% and 6%, respectively, of the variables used in all models. Spatial information in image fractions and image brightness has proven to be more significant than spectral information in these analyses. Of the spatial resolutions evaluated, 0.5 m consistently produced similar or better models than those using the 0.25 or 1.0 m resolutions. These results demonstrate the potential for integration of spatial transforms of image fractions and raw brightness in high-resolution modelling of forest structure and health. D 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

[1]  D. King.  Airborne Multispectral Digital Camera and Video Sensors: A Critical Review of System Designs and Applications , 1995 .

[2]  Peter M. Atkinson,et al.  The integration of spectral and textural information using neural networks for land cover mapping in the Mediterranean , 2000 .

[3]  Philip J. Howarth,et al.  High Spatial Resolution Remote Sensing Data for Forest Ecosystem Classification: An Examination of Spatial Scale , 2000 .

[4]  T. Carlson,et al.  On the relation between NDVI, fractional vegetation cover, and leaf area index , 1997 .

[5]  G. Carter.  Ratios of leaf reflectances in narrow wavebands as indicators of plant stress , 1994 .

[6]  Karin S. Fassnacht,et al.  Relationships between leaf area index and Landsat TM spectral vegetation indices across three temperate zone sites , 1999 .

[7]  B. Pinty,et al.  GEMI: a non-linear index to monitor global vegetation from satellites , 1992, Vegetatio.

[8]  C. Field,et al.  Relationships Between NDVI, Canopy Structure, and Photosynthesis in Three Californian Vegetation Types , 1995 .

[9]  Joan E. Luther,et al.  Development of an Index of Balsam Fir Vigor by Foliar Spectral Reflectance , 1999 .

[10]  D. Peddle.  Spectral Mixture Analysis and Geometric-Optical Reflectance Modeling of Boreal Forest Biophysical Structure , 1999 .

[11]  Philip Lewis,et al.  Investigation of the Utility of Spectral Vegetation Indices for Determining Information on Coniferous Forests , 1998 .

[12]  Meirion Thomas,et al.  Plant Physiology. 3rd. Ed. , 1949 .

[13]  D. King,et al.  Image modelling of forest changes associated with acid mine drainage , 1999 .

[14]  J. Boardman.  Inversion Of Imaging Spectrometry Data Using Singular Value Decomposition , 1989, 12th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium,.

[15]  Cynthia S. A. Wallace,et al.  Characterizing the spatial structure of vegetation communities in the Mojave Desert using geostatistical techniques , 2000 .

[16]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Utilizing local variance of simulated high spatial resolution imagery to predict spatial pattern of forest stands , 2000 .

[17]  K. Staenz,et al.  ISDAS – A System for Processing/Analyzing Hyperspectral Data , 1998 .

[18]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1966 .

[19]  Philip Lewis,et al.  Geostatistical classification for remote sensing: an introduction , 2000 .

[20]  Doug King,et al.  Sugar maple decline assessment based on spectral and textural analysis of multispectral aerial videography , 1991 .

[21]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[22]  Joyce Snell,et al.  6. Alternative Methods of Regression , 1996 .

[23]  R. Waring,et al.  The normalized difference vegetation index of small Douglas-fir canopies with varying chlorophyll concentrations , 1994 .

[24]  Josée Lévesque,et al.  Airborne digital camera image semivariance for evaluation of forest structural damage at an acid mine site , 1999 .

[25]  Susan L. Ustin,et al.  Parameters Affecting Reflectance Of Coniferous Forests In The Region Of Chlorophyll Pigment Absorption , 1989, 12th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium,.

[26]  Gregory J. McDermid,et al.  Forest structural damage analysis using image semivariance , 1994 .

[27]  Joseph W. Boardman,et al.  Analysis, understanding, and visualization of hyperspectral data as convex sets in n space , 1995, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[28]  D. King,et al.  Development of a Forest Health Index Using Multispectral Airborne Digital Camera Imagery , 2000 .