Active and Passive Utility of Search Interface Features in Different Information Seeking Task Stages

Models of information seeking, including Kuhlthau's Information Search Process model, describe fundamentally different macro-level stages. Current search systems usually do not provide support for these stages, but provide a static set of features predominantly focused on supporting micro-level search interactions. This paper investigates the utility of search user interface (SUI) features at different macro-level stages of complex tasks. A user study was designed, using simulated work tasks, to explicitly place users within different stages of a complex task: pre-focus, focus, and post-focus. Active use, passive use and perceived usefulness of features were analysed in order to derive when search features are most useful. Our results identify significant differences in the utility of SUI features between each stage. Specifically, we have observed that informational features are naturally useful in every stage, while input and control features decline in usefulness after the pre-focus stage, and personalisable features become more useful after the pre-focus stage. From these findings, we conclude that features less commonly found in web search interfaces can provide value for users, without cluttering simple searches, when provided at the right times.

[1]  Monica M. C. Schraefel,et al.  A longitudinal study of exploratory and keyword search , 2008, JCDL '08.

[2]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Models in information behaviour research , 1999, J. Documentation.

[3]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Task Complexity Affects Information Seeking and Use , 1995, Inf. Process. Manag..

[4]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Exploratory search , 2006, Commun. ACM.

[5]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Changes in relevance criteria and problem stages in task performance , 2000, J. Documentation.

[6]  Jacek Gwizdka,et al.  Search behaviors in different task types , 2010, JCDL '10.

[7]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Exploratory Search: Beyond the Query-Response Paradigm , 2009, Exploratory Search: Beyond the Query-Response Paradigm.

[8]  Tony Russell-Rose,et al.  Designing the search experience - the information architecture of discovery , 2012 .

[9]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  A theory of the task-based information retrieval process: a summary and generalisation of a longitudinal study , 2001, J. Documentation.

[10]  Jingjing Liu,et al.  Personalizing information retrieval for multi‐session tasks: Examining the roles of task stage, task type, and topic knowledge on the interpretation of dwell time as an indicator of document usefulness , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  Tefko Saracevic,et al.  The Stratified Model of Information Retrieval Interaction: Extension and Applications , 1997 .

[12]  Sebastiaan Mathôt,et al.  PyGaze: An open-source, cross-platform toolbox for minimal-effort programming of eyetracking experiments , 2014, Behavior research methods.

[13]  Tony Russell-Rose Chapter 1 – The User , 2013 .

[14]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction (4th Edition) , 2004 .

[15]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Review of: Kuhlthau, Carol Collier. Seeking meaning: a process approach to library and information services. 2nd. ed. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited, 2004 , 2004, Inf. Res..

[16]  Daqing He,et al.  Searching, browsing, and clicking in a search session: changes in user behavior by task and over time , 2014, SIGIR.

[17]  Elaine Toms,et al.  Untangling search task complexity and difficulty in the context of interactive information retrieval studies , 2014, J. Documentation.

[18]  Marti A. Hearst Search User Interfaces , 2009 .

[19]  Jaap Kamps,et al.  From multistage information-seeking models to multistage search systems , 2014, IIiX.

[20]  Max L. Wilson Search User Interface Design , 2011, Search User Interface Design.

[21]  Ann Blandford,et al.  When is system support effective? , 2010, IIiX.

[22]  Daniel Tunkelang,et al.  Faceted Search , 2009, Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services.

[23]  Pia Borlund,et al.  The IIR evaluation model: a framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems , 2003, Inf. Res..

[24]  Ryen W. White,et al.  A study of factors affecting the utility of implicit relevance feedback , 2005, SIGIR '05.

[25]  Robert G. Capra,et al.  NSF workshop on task-based information search systems , 2013, SIGIR Forum.

[26]  Robert G. Capra,et al.  Influence of training and stage of search on gaze behavior in a library catalog faceted search interface , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[27]  Elaine Toms Task-based information searching and retrieval , 2011, Interactive Information Seeking, Behaviour and Retrieval.

[28]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services , 2009 .

[29]  Diane Kelly,et al.  The use of query suggestions during information search , 2014, Inf. Process. Manag..

[30]  Kerry Rodden,et al.  Eye-mouse coordination patterns on web search results pages , 2008, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[31]  Max L. Wilson Keyword search: Quite exploratory actually , 2009 .

[32]  Abdigani Diriye,et al.  The future is in the past: designing for exploratory search , 2012, IIiX.

[33]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  The Turn - Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context , 2005, The Kluwer International Series on Information Retrieval.

[34]  Susan Dunman,et al.  Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services , 1996 .

[35]  Andreas Dengel,et al.  Eye movements as implicit relevance feedback , 2008, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[36]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[37]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Study of Interactive Feedback During Mediated Information Retrieval , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[38]  Ryen W. White,et al.  WWW 2007 / Track: Browsers and User Interfaces Session: Personalization Investigating Behavioral Variability in Web Search , 2022 .

[39]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Users can change their web search tactics: Design guidelines for categorized overviews , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[40]  Francesco Bonchi,et al.  Do you want to take notes?: identifying research missions in Yahoo! search pad , 2010, WWW '10.

[41]  David Ellis,et al.  A Behavioural Approach to Information Retrieval System Design , 1989, J. Documentation.