Hybrid spiking neural model for clustering smart environment activities

The need for the internet of things technologies becomes a state-of-the-art in this era. Human beings do many activities during their daily life which, in certain cases, should to be recognized and understood. Intelligent systems are considered to be the most advanced methods to analyze such these complex tasks. Spiking neural network is one of the most powerful intelligent techniques that has the ability to solve such these problems. In this paper, a hybrid spiking neural network model is proposed for clustering user's activities which are recognized in a smart environment. The model is composed of both recurrent and adaptive spiking neural networks. The results show that the proposed hybrid spiking neural model is able to do the clustering of users' activities in a distinguishing way.

[1]  Diane J. Cook,et al.  Transfer learning for activity recognition: a survey , 2013, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[2]  Hesham H. Amin,et al.  Clustering of user activities based on adaptive threshold spiking neural networks , 2017, 2017 Ninth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN).

[3]  Zhang Ya Ming,et al.  Network intrusion detection method by least squares support vector machine classifier , 2010, 2010 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology.

[4]  Younghwan Yoo,et al.  User Activity Recognition in Smart Homes Using Pattern Clustering Applied to Temporal ANN Algorithm , 2015, Sensors.

[5]  Diane J. Cook,et al.  CASAS: A Smart Home in a Box , 2013, Computer.

[6]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  SPIKING NEURON MODELS Single Neurons , Populations , Plasticity , 2002 .

[7]  Ming Zeng,et al.  SuperAD: supervised activity discovery , 2015, UbiComp/ISWC Adjunct.

[8]  Henry Markram,et al.  On the Computational Power of Recurrent Circuits of Spiking Neurons , 2002, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[9]  Nicolas Brodu.  Quantifying the Effect of Learning on Recurrent Spikin Neurons , 2007, 2007 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[10]  Hesham H. Amin,et al.  Spiking Neural Network Inter-Spike Time Based Decoding Scheme , 2005, IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Daniel Roggen,et al.  Deep Convolutional and LSTM Recurrent Neural Networks for Multimodal Wearable Activity Recognition , 2016, Sensors.

[12]  Herbert Jaeger,et al.  Reservoir computing approaches to recurrent neural network training , 2009, Comput. Sci. Rev..

[13]  B. Kröse,et al.  Bayesian Activity Recognition in Residence for Elders , 2007 .

[14]  Homay Danaei Mehr,et al.  Resident activity recognition in smart homes by using artificial neural networks , 2016, 2016 4th International Istanbul Smart Grid Congress and Fair (ICSG).

[15]  Hesham H. Amin,et al.  Spiking Neural Networks: Learning, Applications, and Analysis , 2011 .

[16]  Faicel Chamroukhi,et al.  An Unsupervised Approach for Automatic Activity Recognition Based on Hidden Markov Model Regression , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[17]  Yan Wang,et al.  Intelligent Monitoring System for Home Based on FRBF Neural Network , 2015 .

[18]  Eugene M. Izhikevich,et al.  Simple model of spiking neurons , 2003, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[19]  José Luis Peña,et al.  Spike-Threshold Adaptation Predicted by Membrane Potential Dynamics In Vivo , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  Henry Markram,et al.  On the computational power of circuits of spiking neurons , 2004, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[21]  Diane J. Cook,et al.  Enhancing Anomaly Detection Using Temporal Pattern Discovery , 2009 .

[22]  Wolfgang Maass,et al.  Lower Bounds for the Computational Power of Networks of Spiking Neurons , 1996, Neural Computation.