SMAD 8 binding to mice Msx1 basal promoter is required for transcriptional activation.

The Msx1 gene in mice has been proven to be induced by BMP (bone morphogenetic protein) proteins, and three binding sites for SMAD, an intracellular BMP signalling transducer, have already been identified in its promoter. Gel shift analyses were performed and they demonstrated that the consensus found very near the transcription start site, a region designed BP (basal promoter), is functional for binding nuclear proteins from 10.5, 11.5 and 13.5 dpc (days post-coitum) embryos. Notably, this binding occurs only when the SMAD-binding consensus sequence is maintained, suggesting that it is required for the formation of a protein complex over BP. Binding of purified SMAD 1 and SMAD 4 as well as supershift assay with SMAD 1/SMAD 5/SMAD 8 antibody proved that a SMAD protein is present in this complex. Transfection assays in cell cultures with fragments from BP driving the expression of luciferase confirmed that only in the presence of the SMAD consensus site is Msx1 expression activated. A proteomic analysis of the complex components after immunoprecipitation identified several proteins necessary to activate transcription including SMAD 8. Our results suggest that BMP2/BMP4 signalling through SMAD 8 is required for transcriptional activation of the mouse Msx1 gene.

[1]  M. Buckingham,et al.  Insertional mutation of the mouse Msx1 homeobox gene by an nlacZ reporter gene , 1997, Mechanisms of Development.

[2]  B. Doble,et al.  The carboxy-tail of connexin-43 localizes to the nucleus and inhibits cell growth , 2003 .

[3]  R. Baldock,et al.  The Msh-like homeobox genes define domains in the developing vertebrate eye. , 1991, Development.

[4]  Denis Vivien,et al.  Direct binding of Smad3 and Smad4 to critical TGFβ‐inducible elements in the promoter of human plasminogen activator inhibitor‐type 1 gene , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[5]  E. Abdelhay,et al.  Structural and functional analysis of mouse Msx1 gene promoter: sequence conservation with human MSX1 promoter points at potential regulatory elements. , 1998, DNA and cell biology.

[6]  B. Jacq,et al.  Hox‐7, a mouse homeobox gene with a novel pattern of expression during embryogenesis. , 1989, The EMBO journal.

[7]  R. Raghow,et al.  Msx3 protein recruits histone deacetylase to down-regulate the Msx1 promoter. , 2001, The Biochemical journal.

[8]  R. Raghow,et al.  Exogenous expression of Msx1 renders myoblasts refractory to differentiation into myotubes and elicits enhanced biosynthesis of four unique mRNAs , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry.

[9]  M. Justice,et al.  A new family of mouse homeo box-containing genes: molecular structure, chromosomal location, and developmental expression of Hox-7.1. , 1989, Genes & development.

[10]  C. Abate-Shen,et al.  A role for the Msx-1 homeodomain in transcriptional regulation: residues in the N-terminal arm mediate TATA binding protein interaction and transcriptional repression. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  R. Raghow,et al.  A Minimal Murine Msx-1 Gene Promoter , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  Benoit Robert,et al.  Characterization of a Smad motif similar to Drosophila mad in the mouse Msx 1 promoter. , 2002, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[13]  Kirby D. Johnson,et al.  Drosophila Mad binds to DNA and directly mediates activation of vestigial by Decapentaplegic , 1997, Nature.

[14]  R. Raghow,et al.  Murine homeobox-containing gene, Msx-1: analysis of genomic organization, promoter structure, and potential autoregulatory cis-acting elements. , 1994, Genomics.

[15]  K. Miyazono,et al.  Characterization of a bone morphogenetic protein-responsive Smad-binding element. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[16]  Duncan Davidson,et al.  Two enhancer domains control early aspects of the complex expression pattern of Msx1 , 1997, Mechanisms of Development.

[17]  P. Woloshin,et al.  MSX1 inhibits MyoD expression in fibroblast × 10T½ cell hybrids , 1995, Cell.

[18]  M. Shen,et al.  Comparison of MSX-1 and MSX-2 suggests a molecular basis for functional redundancy , 1996, Mechanisms of Development.

[19]  B. Hogan,et al.  Involvement of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-4 (BMP-4) and Vgr-1 in morphogenesis and neurogenesis in the mouse. , 1991, Development.

[20]  M. M. Bradford.  A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. , 1976, Analytical biochemistry.

[21]  K. Miyazono,et al.  Smad6 Is a Smad1/5-induced Smad Inhibitor , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  M. Ferguson,et al.  Expression patterns of the homeobox gene, Hox-8, in the mouse embryo suggest a role in specifying tooth initiation and shape. , 1992, Development.

[23]  K. Song,et al.  Expression of Hox-7.1 in myoblasts inhibits terminal differentiation and induces cell transformation , 1992, Nature.

[24]  R. Maas,et al.  Msx1 deficient mice exhibit cleft palate and abnormalities of craniofacial and tooth development , 1994, Nature Genetics.

[25]  J. Inostroza,et al.  Transcriptional repression by Msx-1 does not require homeodomain DNA-binding sites , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[26]  R. Raghow,et al.  Transcriptional autorepression of Msx1 gene is mediated by interactions of Msx1 protein with a multi-protein transcriptional complex containing TATA-binding protein, Sp1 and cAMP-response-element-binding protein-binding protein (CBP/p300). , 1999, The Biochemical journal.

[27]  B. Hogan,et al.  Colocalization of BMP 7 and BMP 2 RNAs suggests that these factors cooperatively mediate tissue interactions during murine development , 1995, Mechanisms of Development.

[28]  R. Roeder,et al.  Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei. , 1983, Nucleic acids research.

[29]  D. Davidson,et al.  The function and evolution of Msx genes: pointers and paradoxes. , 1995, Trends in genetics : TIG.