Core congestion is inherent in hyperbolic networks

We investigate the impact the negative curvature has on the traffic congestion in large-scale networks. We prove that every Gromov hyperbolic network $G$ admits a core, thus answering in the positive a conjecture by Jonckheere, Lou, Bonahon, and Baryshnikov, Internet Mathematics, 7 (2011) which is based on the experimental observation by Narayan and Saniee, Physical Review E, 84 (2011) that real-world networks with small hyperbolicity have a core congestion. Namely, we prove that for every subset $X$ of vertices of a $\delta$-hyperbolic graph $G$ there exists a vertex $m$ of $G$ such that the disk $D(m,4 \delta)$ of radius $4 \delta$ centered at $m$ intercepts at least one half of the total flow between all pairs of vertices of $X$, where the flow between two vertices $x,y\in X$ is carried by geodesic (or quasi-geodesic) $(x,y)$-paths. A set $S$ intercepts the flow between two nodes $x$ and $y$ if $S$ intersect every shortest path between $x$ and $y$. Differently from what was conjectured by Jonckheere et al., we show that $m$ is not (and cannot be) the center of mass of $X$ but is a node close to the median of $X$ in the so-called injective hull of $X$. In case of non-uniform traffic between nodes of $X$ (in this case, the unit flow exists only between certain pairs of nodes of $X$ defined by a commodity graph $R$), we prove a primal-dual result showing that for any $\rho>5\delta$ the size of a $\rho$-multi-core (i.e., the number of disks of radius $\rho$) intercepting all pairs of $R$ is upper bounded by the maximum number of pairwise $(\rho-3\delta)$-apart pairs of $R$.

[1]  Iraj Saniee,et al.  Large-scale curvature of networks. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[2]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Community Structure in Large Networks: Natural Cluster Sizes and the Absence of Large Well-Defined Clusters , 2008, Internet Math..

[3]  A. Ndreas,et al.  T -theory : An Overview , 1996 .

[4]  Laurent Viennot,et al.  Treewidth and Hyperbolicity of the Internet , 2011, 2011 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications.

[5]  Daniel T. Wise,et al.  Packing subgroups in relatively hyperbolic groups , 2009 .

[6]  Yuliy Baryshnikov,et al.  Euclidean versus Hyperbolic Congestion in Idealized versus Experimental Networks , 2009, Internet Math..

[7]  Noga Alon,et al.  Piercing d -Intervals , 1998, Discret. Comput. Geom..

[8]  Maurice Pouzet,et al.  Retracts: graphs and ordered sets from the metric point of view , 1986 .

[9]  Noga Alon Covering a hypergraph of subgraphs , 2002, Discret. Math..

[10]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Scale-free characteristics of random networks: the topology of the world-wide web , 2000 .

[11]  Fan Chung Graham,et al.  The Average Distance in a Random Graph with Given Expected Degrees , 2004, Internet Math..

[12]  William Sean Kennedy,et al.  On the Hyperbolicity of Large-Scale Networks , 2013, ArXiv.

[13]  H. Short,et al.  Notes on word hyperbolic groups , 1991 .

[14]  A. Dress Trees, tight extensions of metric spaces, and the cohomological dimension of certain groups: A note on combinatorial properties of metric spaces , 1984 .

[15]  M. Habib,et al.  Notes on diameters , centers , and approximating trees of δ-hyperbolic geodesic spaces and graphs , 2008 .

[16]  M. Bridson,et al.  Metric Spaces of Non-Positive Curvature , 1999 .

[17]  A. Haefliger,et al.  Group theory from a geometrical viewpoint , 1991 .

[18]  Reuven Bar-Yehuda,et al.  Scheduling split intervals , 2002, SODA '02.

[19]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  The small-world phenomenon: an algorithmic perspective , 2000, STOC '00.

[20]  Marián Boguñá,et al.  Navigability of Complex Networks , 2007, ArXiv.

[21]  Michalis Faloutsos,et al.  On power-law relationships of the Internet topology , 1999, SIGCOMM '99.

[22]  Wei Chen,et al.  On the Hyperbolicity of Small-World and Treelike Random Graphs , 2012, Internet Math..

[23]  Graham A. Niblo,et al.  Coxeter Groups act on CAT(0) cube complexes , 2003 .

[24]  A. O. Houcine On hyperbolic groups , 2006 .

[25]  J. Isbell Six theorems about injective metric spaces , 1964 .

[26]  Victor Chepoi,et al.  Cop and Robber Game and Hyperbolicity , 2013, SIAM J. Discret. Math..

[27]  Michah Sageev,et al.  Codimension-1 Subgroups and Splittings of Groups , 1997 .

[28]  N. Aronszajn,et al.  EXTENSION OF UNIFORMLY CONTINUOUS TRANSFORMATIONS AND HYPERCONVEX METRIC SPACES , 1956 .

[29]  Erwin Pesch,et al.  Retracts of graphs , 1988 .

[30]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Small-World Phenomena and the Dynamics of Information , 2001, NIPS.

[31]  Blair D. Sullivan,et al.  Tree-Like Structure in Large Social and Information Networks , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining.

[32]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[33]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[34]  Feodor F. Dragan,et al.  Metric tree‐like structures in real‐world networks: an empirical study , 2016, Networks.

[35]  Yuval Shavitt,et al.  On Hyperbolic Embedding of Internet Graph for Distance Estimation and Overlay Construction , 2007 .

[36]  Victor Chepoi,et al.  Packing and Covering delta -Hyperbolic Spaces by Balls , 2007, APPROX-RANDOM.

[37]  Nellie Clarke Brown Trees , 1896, Savage Dreams.

[38]  Urs Lang,et al.  Injective hulls of certain discrete metric spaces and groups , 2011, 1107.5971.