Being bad isn't always good: affective context moderates the attention bias toward negative information.

Research has demonstrated that people automatically devote more attention to negative information than to positive information. The authors conducted 3 experiments to test whether this bias is attenuated by a person's affective context. Specifically, the authors primed participants with positive and negative information using traditional (e.g., subliminal semantic priming) and nontraditional (e.g., social interactions) means and measured the amount of attention they allocated to positive and negative information. With both event-related brain potentials (Experiment 1) and the Stroop task (Experiments 2 and 3), results suggest that the attention bias to negative information is attenuated or eliminated when positive constructs are made accessible. The implications of this result for other biases to negative information and for the self-reinforcing nature of emotional disorders are discussed.

[1]  J. Bargh Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. , 1989 .

[2]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choices, Values, and Frames , 2000 .

[3]  Jeff T. Larsen,et al.  May I have your attention, please: Electrocortical responses to positive and negative stimuli , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  D. Clark A cognitive model of panic attacks. , 1988 .

[5]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Beyond Bipolar Conceptualizations and Measures: The Case of Attitudes and Evaluative Space , 1997, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[6]  Kevin J. Hawley,et al.  Perceptual inhibition of expected inputs: The key that opens closed minds , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. , 1980 .

[8]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: the mobilization-minimization hypothesis. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  N. Anderson PRIMACY EFFECTS IN PERSONALITY IMPRESSION FORMATION USING A GENERALIZED ORDER EFFECT PARADIGM. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Donal E. Carlston,et al.  Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. , 1989 .

[11]  K. Rothermund Motivation and attention: Incongruent effects of feedback on the processing of valence. , 2003, Emotion.

[12]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Mood management across affective states: the hedonic contingency hypothesis. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Jeff T. Larsen,et al.  Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: the negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Peter J. Lang,et al.  Eliciting Affect Using the International Affective Picture System: Trajectories through Evaluative Space , 1998 .

[15]  R. Fazio,et al.  On the orienting value of attitudes: attitude accessibility as a determinant of an object's attraction of visual attention. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  E. Donchin Multivariate analysis of event-related potential data: A tutorial review , 1978 .

[17]  Tanya L. Chartrand,et al.  Consequences of automatic goal pursuit and the case of nonconscious mimicry. , 2003 .

[18]  G.J.M. van Boxtel,et al.  Computational and statistical methods for analyzing event-related potential data , 1998 .

[19]  T. Dalgleish,et al.  The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  Joseph P. Forgas,et al.  Social judgments : implicit and explicit processes , 2003 .

[21]  C. H. Hansen,et al.  Finding the face in the crowd: an anger superiority effect. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  T. Dalgleish,et al.  Handbook of cognition and emotion , 1999 .

[23]  Thomas Brothen,et al.  Attention, attraction, and individual differences in reaction to criticism. , 1980 .

[24]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Spatial Selective Attention Affects Early Extrastriate But Not Striate Components of the Visual Evoked Potential , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  J. H. Neely Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Evidence for facilitatory and inhibitory processes , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[26]  Duncan David Nulty,et al.  Construct accessibility, depression and the emotional stroop task: Transient mood or stable structure? , 1986 .

[27]  J. Maser,et al.  Panic: Psychological Perspectives , 1988 .

[28]  J. Spence,et al.  Verbal versus Nonverbal Reinforcement Combinations in the Discrimination Learning of Middle- and Lower-Class Children , 1967 .

[29]  K. Vohs,et al.  Case Western Reserve University , 1990 .

[30]  Charles P. Thompson,et al.  Autobiographical memory: unpleasantness fades faster than pleasantness over time , 1997 .

[31]  J. R. Hughes Multidisciplinary perspectives in event-related brain potential research , 1980 .

[32]  A. Ohman,et al.  The face in the crowd revisited: a threat advantage with schematic stimuli. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  If Attitudes Affect How Stimuli Are Processed, Should They Not Affect the Event-Related Brain Potential? , 1993 .

[34]  N. Anderson Averaging versus adding as a stimulus-combination rule in impression formation. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  T. Chartrand,et al.  THE UNBEARABLE AUTOMATICITY OF BEING , 1999 .

[36]  G. Peeters,et al.  Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Evaluations: The Distinction Between Affective and Informational Negativity Effects , 1990 .

[37]  H. Semlitsch,et al.  A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[38]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  B. Fredrickson,et al.  Positive Emotions Trigger Upward Spirals Toward Emotional Well-Being , 2002, Psychological science.

[40]  P. Lang International Affective Picture System (IAPS) : Technical Manual and Affective Ratings , 1995 .

[41]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. , 1996 .

[42]  Leila T. Worth,et al.  Processing deficits and the mediation of positive affect in persuasion. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  O. John,et al.  Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of negative social information. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  John A. Bargh,et al.  The additive nature of chronic and temporary sources of construct accessibility. , 1986 .