Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessing Tumor Vascularity and Vascular Effects of Targeted Therapies in Renal Cell Carcinoma

Traditional cross-sectional tumor imaging focuses solely on tumor morphology. With the introduction of targeted biological therapies in human trials, morphologic change may lag behind other physiologic measures of response on clinical images. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is a new imaging method for assessing the physiologic state of tumor vascularity in vivo. DCE-MRI, which uses available imaging techniques and contrast agents, assays the kinetics of tumor enhancement during bolus i.v. contrast administration. Modeling of the temporal enhancement pattern yields physiologic variables related to tumor blood flow and microvessel permeability. Changes in these variables after vascular-targeted therapy can then be quantified to evaluate the tumor vascular response. As these responses may precede morphologic tumor shrinkage, DCE-MRI might serve as a noninvasive means of monitoring early tumor response to vascular-targeted therapy. Renal cell carcinoma provides an excellent model for assessing the effect on DCE-MRI in clinical trials. The vascular richness of renal tumors provides a large dynamic scale of DCE-MRI measures. Patients with disseminated renal cell carcinoma frequently present with one or several large tumors, creating an easy imaging target for DCE-MRI evaluation. Finally, renal cell carcinoma is clearly susceptible to therapies that target tumor angiogenesis. DCE-MRI can be used to monitor the vascular changes induced by such therapies. Future efforts must be directed to standardizing image acquisition and analysis techniques to quantify tumor vascular responses.

[1]  H. Toyoda,et al.  Evaluation of pathological features of hepatocellular carcinoma by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: comparison with pathology on resected specimen. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[2]  G. Rosner,et al.  Phase II placebo-controlled randomized discontinuation trial of sorafenib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  J. Berlin,et al.  Phase I/Pilot Study of SU5416 (Semaxinib) in Combination With Irinotecan/Bolus 5-FU/LV (IFL) in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer , 2006, American journal of clinical oncology.

[4]  M. Cova,et al.  Blood Flow Changes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma After the Administration of Thalidomide Assessed by Reperfusion Kinetics During Microbubble Infusion: Preliminary Results , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[5]  N. Haseke,et al.  Targeted agents for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. , 2005, Current drug targets.

[6]  S Nioka,et al.  NIR Spectroscopic Detection of Breast Cancer , 2005, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[7]  K. Flaherty,et al.  Pharmacodynamic study of BAY 43-9006 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma , 2005 .

[8]  Soren D. Konecky,et al.  Diffuse optical tomography of breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a case study with comparison to MRI. , 2005, Medical physics.

[9]  David C. Alsop,et al.  Arterial spin labeling blood flow magnetic resonance imaging for the characterization of metastatic renal cell carcinoma1 , 2005 .

[10]  M. Bock,et al.  Preoperative Staging of Renal Cell Carcinoma With Inferior Vena Cava Thrombus Using Multidetector CT and MRI: Prospective Study With Histopathological Correlation , 2005, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[11]  N. Rofsky,et al.  Arterial spin labeling blood flow magnetic resonance imaging for the characterization of metastatic renal cell carcinoma(1). , 2005, Academic radiology.

[12]  C. Roy,et al.  Significance of the pseudocapsule on MRI of renal neoplasms and its potential application for local staging: a retrospective study. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  E. Jung,et al.  Vascularization and perfusion of hepatocellular carcinoma: assessment with contrast-enhanced ultrasound using perflutren protein-type A microspheres. , 2005, Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation.

[14]  S. Ametamey,et al.  Assessment of hypoxia and perfusion in human brain tumors using PET with 18F-fluoromisonidazole and 15O-H2O. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  H. Honda,et al.  MR imaging of renal cell carcinoma: its role in determining cell type. , 2004, Radiation medicine.

[16]  A. Ruppert-Kohlmayr,et al.  Differentiation of renal clear cell carcinoma and renal papillary carcinoma using quantitative CT enhancement parameters. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  P. Choyke,et al.  MR evaluation of solid renal masses. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[18]  V. Ravery,et al.  Preoperative imaging in renal cell cancer , 2004, World Journal of Urology.

[19]  Viktor Novikov,et al.  Tumor microvascular changes in antiangiogenic treatment: Assessment by magnetic resonance contrast media of different molecular weights , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  Carlo Magno,et al.  Contrast-enhanced second-harmonic sonography in the detection of pseudocapsule in renal cell carcinoma. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  Susan M. Schultz,et al.  Color and Power Doppler Sonography in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer , 2004, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[22]  G. Israel,et al.  Evaluation of cystic renal masses: comparison of CT and MR imaging by using the Bosniak classification system. , 2004, Radiology.

[23]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Assessment of Irradiated Brain Metastases by Means of Arterial Spin-Labeling and Dynamic Susceptibility-Weighted Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MRI: Initial Results , 2004, Investigative radiology.

[24]  Weijing Sun,et al.  Phase I trial of the antivascular agent combretastatin A4 phosphate on a 5-day schedule to patients with cancer: magnetic resonance imaging evidence for altered tumor blood flow. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  J. Yap,et al.  Assessment of pharmacodynamic vascular response in a phase I trial of combretastatin A4 phosphate. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  Martin A Lodge,et al.  Combretastatin A4 phosphate has tumor antivascular activity in rat and man as demonstrated by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  A. Harris,et al.  Measurement of renal tumour and normal tissue perfusion using positron emission tomography in a phase II clinical trial of razoxane , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[28]  J. Ripoll,et al.  In vivo continuous-wave optical breast imaging enhanced with Indocyanine Green. , 2003, Medical physics.

[29]  A. Padhani Dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI in clinical oncology: Current status and future directions , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[30]  J. Lewin,et al.  A phase I pharmacokinetic and translational study of the novel vascular targeting agent combretastatin a-4 phosphate on a single-dose intravenous schedule in patients with advanced cancer. , 2002, Cancer research.

[31]  Kyoung-Sik Cho,et al.  Differentiation of subtypes of renal cell carcinoma on helical CT scans. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[32]  R. Reznek,et al.  Assessment of tumor invasion of the vena caval wall in renal cell carcinoma cases by magnetic resonance imaging. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[33]  G. Sudakoff,et al.  Using MR angiography for surgical planning in pelvic kidney renal cell carcinoma. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[34]  P. Alken,et al.  Color Duplex Sonography vs. Computed Tomography: Accuracy in the Preoperative Evaluation of Renal Cell Carcinoma , 2001, European Urology.

[35]  W. Yuh,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of radiation response in cervical cancer: Regarding Hatano K et al. IJROBP 1999; 45:339-334 [4] (multiple letters) , 2000 .

[36]  W. Yuh,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of radiation response in cervical cancer: regarding Hatano K et al. IJROBP 1999; 45:399-344. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[37]  M. Garwood,et al.  Imaging blood flow in brain tumors using arterial spin labeling , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[38]  E. Conant,et al.  Quantitative vascularity of breast masses by Doppler imaging: regional variations and diagnostic implications. , 2000, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[39]  Tran,et al.  9:30-9:45. First Pass FDG Measured Blood Flow in Tumors: A Comparison with O-15 Labeled Water Measured Blood Flow. , 2000, Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T.

[40]  L P Clarke NCI initiative: development of novel imaging technologies. , 2000, Medical physics.

[41]  V. Ntziachristos,et al.  Concurrent MRI and diffuse optical tomography of breast after indocyanine green enhancement. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  H. Augustin,et al.  Heterogeneity of angiogenesis and blood vessel maturation in human tumors: implications for antiangiogenic tumor therapies. , 2000, Cancer research.

[43]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[44]  M Van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[45]  W E Reddick,et al.  Dynamic MR imaging (DEMRI) of microcirculation in bone sarcoma , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[46]  G Brix,et al.  Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[47]  J L Evelhoch,et al.  Key factors in the acquisition of contrast kinetic data for oncology , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[48]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[49]  K. Miles,et al.  CT measurement of perfusion and permeability within lymphoma masses and its ability to assess grade, activity, and chemotherapeutic response. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[50]  E. Pretorius,et al.  Renal neoplasms amenable to partial nephrectomy: MR imaging. , 1999, Radiology.

[51]  E K Outwater,et al.  Detection of lipid in abdominal tissues with opposed-phase gradient-echo images at 1.5 T: techniques and diagnostic importance. , 1998, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[52]  M V Knopp,et al.  Angiogenic activity of cervical carcinoma: assessment by functional magnetic resonance imaging-based parameters and a histomorphological approach in correlation with disease outcome. , 1998, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[53]  P. Taourel,et al.  Enhancement patterns of renal masses during multiphase helical CT acquisitions , 1998, Abdominal Imaging.

[54]  R Sinnatamby,et al.  In vivo assessment of neovascularization of liver metastases using perfusion CT. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[55]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Lipid in renal clear cell carcinoma: detection on opposed-phase gradient-echo MR images. , 1997, Radiology.

[56]  N. van Bruggen,et al.  Assessing tumor angiogenesis using macromolecular MR imaging contrast media , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[57]  I. Klein,et al.  Renal cell carcinoma of clear type: correlation of CT features with tumor size, architectural patterns, and pathologic staging , 1997, European Radiology.

[58]  Y Narumi,et al.  Renal cell carcinoma: preoperative assessment for enucleative surgery with angiography, CT, and MRI. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[59]  Q. L. Huang,et al.  MR appearance of the pseudocapsule of renal cell carcinoma and its pathologic basis. , 1992, Urologic radiology.

[60]  Huang Sui-qiao,et al.  MR appearance of the pseudocapsule of renal cell carcinoma and its pathologic basis , 1991 .

[61]  M. Bosniak,et al.  The current radiological approach to renal cysts. , 1986, Radiology.