Setting Up a CEM Program

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is an imaging tool that is increasingly being used to evaluate for breast cancer. It is important for breast groups to understand how this system works and its impact on clinical workflow prior to implementation to ensure a smooth transition. In this chapter, we will review the equipment, physical space, and data storage requirements; the most common indications for use and the patient selection process; how CEM images are acquired and the steps involved in planning and performing the exam; the necessary staff training; and lastly strategies for marketing your new CEM system.

[1]  Alessio Signori,et al.  Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: Systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2016, Breast.

[2]  M. Messenger,et al.  Point-of-care creatinine testing for kidney function measurement prior to contrast-enhanced diagnostic imaging: evaluation of the performance of three systems for clinical utility , 2018, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[3]  L. Staib,et al.  High-Fidelity Contrast Reaction Simulation Training: Performance Comparison of Faculty, Fellows, and Residents. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Radiology.

[4]  M. Hirose,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in comparison to conventional full-field digital mammography in a population of women with dense breasts , 2016, Breast Cancer.

[5]  P. Slanetz,et al.  Workflow Considerations for Incorporation of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography Into a Breast Imaging Practice. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[6]  Yun-Chung Cheung,et al.  Diagnostic performance of dual-energy contrast-enhanced subtracted mammography in dense breasts compared to mammography alone: interobserver blind-reading analysis , 2014, European Radiology.

[7]  P. Slanetz,et al.  Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) versus MRI in the high-risk screening setting: patient preferences and attitudes. , 2017, Clinical imaging.

[8]  M. Lobbes,et al.  Assessing the Risk of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Using a Finger Stick Analysis in Recalls from Breast Screening: The CINFIBS Explorative Study , 2017, Contrast media & molecular imaging.

[9]  J. Wildberger,et al.  Evaluation of low-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography images by comparing them to full-field digital mammography using EUREF image quality criteria , 2015, European Radiology.

[10]  S Gommers,et al.  Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in recalls from the Dutch breast cancer screening program: validation of results in a large multireader, multicase study , 2016, European Radiology.

[11]  J. James,et al.  Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography improves diagnostic accuracy in the symptomatic setting. , 2016, Clinical radiology.

[12]  Joachim E. Wildberger,et al.  Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in patients referred from the breast cancer screening programme , 2014, European Radiology.

[13]  Janice S. Sung,et al.  Comparison of screening CEDM and MRI for women at increased risk for breast cancer: A pilot study. , 2017, European journal of radiology.

[14]  Bernd Hamm,et al.  Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: Does mammography provide additional clinical benefits or can some radiation exposure be avoided? , 2014, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[15]  Barbara A Pockaj,et al.  Potential Cost Savings of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography. , 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  J. Wildberger,et al.  The Quality of Tumor Size Assessment by Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography and the Benefit of Additional Breast MRI , 2015, Journal of Cancer.

[17]  M. Krohn,et al.  Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: Initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size , 2013, European Radiology.

[18]  Luca Braglia,et al.  Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in neoadjuvant chemotherapy monitoring: a comparison with breast magnetic resonance imaging , 2017, Breast Cancer Research.

[19]  Barbara A Pockaj,et al.  Assessing tumor extent on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus full-field digital mammography and ultrasound. , 2017, Clinical imaging.

[20]  J. Sayre,et al.  Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: Comparison of Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography and Breast MR Imaging in the Evaluation of Extent of Disease. , 2017, Radiology.

[21]  B. Hamm,et al.  Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography vs. mammography and MRI – clinical performance in a multi-reader evaluation , 2017, European Radiology.

[22]  Janice S Sung,et al.  Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma. , 2013, Radiology.

[23]  D. Hippe,et al.  Comparative Effectiveness of Hands-on Versus Computer Simulation-Based Training for Contrast Media Reactions and Teamwork Skills. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.