Classifications of clinical and bowel morphological changes and their relationship with characteristics of patients with incarcerated groin hernias

Background There is currently no grading standard for the degree of clinical and bowel morphological changes. The objective of this study was to define clinical and bowel morphological classifications and investigate the possible relationship with the characteristics of patients with incarcerated groin hernias. Material/Methods We retrospectively studied 195 patients who underwent emergency hernia repair with simultaneous bowel resection between January 1992 and January 2012. We classified the degree of clinical and bowel morphological changes into 3 grades based on the incarceration time, intestinal morphology after damage, hernia sac integrity, degree of inflammation, and the presence/absence of bacterial growth, peritonitis signs, mechanical obstruction, cellulitis, and systemic shock. We also recorded patient characteristics and analyzed their relationships with these degrees according to our grading system. Results We identified 134, 42, and 19 cases of Grades I, II, and III of clinical and bowel morphological changes, respectively. Pearson’s chi-squared tests revealed that advanced age (P=0.001), presence of comorbid disease (P=0.002), and high American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (P=0.017) were related to the degree. Morbidity and mortality also showed significant relationships with the degree (P<0.001, P=0.005, respectively), especially with regard to post-operative infection. Conclusions The proposed 3-stage classifications of clinical and bowel morphological changes can be used to objectively reflect the degree of bowel damage. Greater levels of the changes were associated with higher incidences of complications and increased mortality, especially for older patients with comorbid diseases and poor ASA scores. Urgent surgery should be performed to avoid bowel damage exacerbation.

[1]  C. Moreno-Sanz,et al.  Improved outcomes of incarcerated femoral hernia: a multivariate analysis of predictive factors of bowel ischemia and potential impact on postoperative complications. , 2013, American journal of surgery.

[2]  A. Malik,et al.  Factors influencing morbidity and mortality in elderly population undergoing inguinal hernia surgery. , 2010, JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association.

[3]  S. Karademir,et al.  Prosthetic repair of acutely incarcerated groin hernias: a prospective clinical observational cohort study , 2010, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.

[4]  H. Unalp,et al.  Factors affecting morbidity and mortality in incarcerated abdominal wall hernias , 2007, Hernia.

[5]  R. Baldonedo,et al.  Incarcerated groin hernias in adults: Presentation and outcome , 2004, Hernia.

[6]  M. Oncel,et al.  Risk and Outcome of Bowel Resection in Patients with Incarcerated Groin Hernias: Retrospective Study , 2003, World Journal of Surgery.

[7]  J. Dunne,et al.  Abdominal wall hernias: risk factors for infection and resource utilization. , 2003, The Journal of surgical research.

[8]  M. Ozmen,et al.  Emergency hernia repairs in elderly patients. , 2001, American journal of surgery.

[9]  A. Wysocki,et al.  Use of polypropylene prostheses for strangulated inguinal and incisional hernias , 2001, Hernia.

[10]  M. Ozmen,et al.  Presentation and outcome of incarcerated external hernias in adults. , 2001, American journal of surgery.

[11]  W. Schwesinger,et al.  Complicated presentations of groin hernias. , 1991, American journal of surgery.

[12]  G. R. Tingwald,et al.  Inguinal and femoral hernia repair in geriatric patients. , 1982, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[13]  N. J. Andrews Presentation and outcome of strangulated external hernia in a district general hospital , 1981, The British journal of surgery.