Determining Sustainable Levels of Cumulative Effects for Boreal Caribou

Abstract Direct and indirect effects of industrial development have contributed, in part, to the threatened status of boreal ecotype caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in Alberta and Canada. Our goal was to develop a model that would allow managers to identify landscape-scale targets for industrial development, while ensuring functional habitat for sustainable caribou populations. We examined the relationship between functional habitat loss resulting from cumulative effects of natural and anthropogenic disturbance, and the rate of population change (λ) for 6 populations of boreal caribou in Alberta, Canada. We defined functional habitat loss according to 2 variables for which we had a priori reasons to suspect causative associations with λ: 1) percentage area of caribou range within 250 m of anthropogenic footprint, and 2) percentage of caribou range disturbed by wildfire within the last 50 years. Multiple regression coefficients for both independent variables indicated significant effects on λ. The 2-predictor model explained 96% (R2) of observed variation in λ among population units (F2,3 = 35.2, P = 0.008). The model may be used to evaluate plans for industrial development in relation to predicted wildfire rates and goals for caribou population growth rates.

[1]  R. Powell,et al.  An Evaluation of the Accuracy of Kernel Density Estimators for Home Range Analysis , 1996 .

[2]  A. K. Stuart-Smith,et al.  Distribution of Caribou and Wolves in Relation to Linear Corridors , 2000 .

[3]  Paula Rae. Oberg.  Responses of mountain caribou to linear features in a west-central Alberta landscape , 2001 .

[4]  B. Worton.  Using Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate kernel-based home range estimators , 1995 .

[5]  S. Boutin,et al.  Lichen abundance in the peatlands of northern Alberta: Implications for boreal caribou , 2006 .

[6]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Null Hypothesis Testing: Problems, Prevalence, and an Alternative , 2000 .

[7]  Graeme Caughley,et al.  Analysis of vertebrate populations , 1977 .

[8]  Stan Boutin,et al.  Avoidance of Industrial Development by Woodland Caribou , 2001 .

[9]  Kirby G. Smith,et al.  Woodland Caribou Demography and Persistence Relative to Landscape Change in , 2004 .

[10]  H. Charles Romesburg,et al.  WILDLIFE SCIENCE: GAINING RELIABLE KNOWLEDGE , 1981 .

[11]  E. J. Edmonds.  Population status, distribution, and movements of woodland caribou in west central Alberta , 1988 .

[12]  T. L. Hillis,et al.  Demographic characteristics of circumpolar caribou populations: ecotypes, ecological constraints, releases, and population dynamics , 1998 .

[13]  Michael A. D. Ferguson.  Status and trends of Rangifer tarandus and Ovibos moschatus populations in Canada , 1992 .

[14]  E. Dzus.  Status of the woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in Alberta , 2001 .

[15]  Adam Ross Cochrane James,et al.  Effects of industrial development on the predator-prey relationship between wolves and caribou in northeastern Alberta , 1999 .

[16]  F. Messier,et al.  Hierarchical habitat selection by woodland caribou: its relationship to limiting factors , 2000 .

[17]  Corey J. A. Bradshaw,et al.  Winter peatland habitat selection by woodland caribou in northeastern Alberta , 1995 .

[18]  Kirby G. Smith,et al.  Winter distribution of woodland caribou in relation to clear-cut logging in west-central Alberta , 2000 .

[19]  S. Boutin,et al.  Declines in populations of woodland caribou , 2003 .

[20]  B. Worton.  Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies , 1989 .

[21]  B. Silverman.  Density estimation for statistics and data analysis , 1986 .

[22]  Joshua J. Millspaugh,et al.  Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates , 1999 .

[23]  Bruce J. Worton,et al.  Optimal smoothing parameters for multivariate fized and adaptive kernel methods , 1989 .