Piriform and trochanteric fossae. A drawing mismatch or a terminology error? A review

The current literature indicates that the standard starting point for intramedullary nailing is the piriform fossa. The accuracy of the entry point for anterograde femoral intramedullary nailing between published texts and relevant illustrations was recorded. The piriform fossa is the site of insertion of the piriform tendon and represents a small, shallow depression located on the tip of the greater trochanter. The trochanteric fossa is a deep depression on the inner surface of the greater trochanter, and in the vast majority of the published data is indicated incorrectly as “piriform fossa”. As a result of either a recurrent drawing mismatch or a terminology error, the correct entry point for anterograde femoral intramedullary nailing is confusing and should be indicated in the current literature. The trochanteric fossa appears to be the standard entry point that most surgeons recommend.

[1]  L. Kurtev.  [Diaphyseal fractures of the femur]. , 1958, Khirurgiia.

[2]  M. Swiontkowski,et al.  Fractures of the proximal part of the femur. , 1994, Instructional course lectures.

[3]  W. Carson,et al.  Curvature of the Femur and the Proximal Entry Point for an Intramedullary Rod , 1987, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  N. Ebraheim,et al.  Entry Sites for Antegrade Femoral Nailing , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  C. Blair.  The Interactive Skeleton , 1996 .

[6]  D. Templeman,et al.  Fractures and Dislocations , 1992 .

[7]  R. Brumback.  The rationales of interlocking nailing of the femur, tibia, and humerus. , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  S. Hansen,et al.  Closed intramedullary nailing of the femur. Küntscher technique with reaming. , 1979, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  M. Swiontkowski,et al.  Iatrogenic fractures of the femoral neck during closed nailing of the femoral shaft. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[10]  Ernest W. Hey Groves,et al.  Ununited fractures, with special reference to gunshot injuries and the use of bone grafting , 1918 .

[11]  R. Ganz,et al.  Entry Point Soft Tissue Damage in Antegrade Femoral Nailing: A Cadaver Study , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[12]  O HUDSON,et al.  Intertrochanteric fractures. , 1957, Clinical orthopaedics.

[13]  McMaster Wc.  Closed insertion technique for the prebent Sampson femoral rod. , 1979 .

[14]  D. Clawson,et al.  Closed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. A report of five hundred and twenty cases. 1984. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  Gerhard Küntscher,et al.  Die Marknagelung von Knochenbrüchen , 1940, Klinische Wochenschrift.

[16]  Asheesh Bedi,et al.  Subtrochanteric femur fractures. , 2004, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[17]  R. W. Adams,et al.  Complications arising in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures. , 1949, American journal of surgery.

[18]  危杰.  Intertrochanteric fractures , 2004 .

[19]  Robert A. Winquist,et al.  Locked Femoral Nailing , 1993, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[20]  Sigvard T. Hansen,et al.  Closed Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Fractures , 2001 .

[21]  A Grosse,et al.  Closed locked intramedullary nailing. Its application to comminuted fractures of the femur. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  N. Shrive,et al.  The effect of the entry hole for an intramedullary nail on the strength of the proximal femur. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[23]  S. Weller,et al.  Medullary Nailing of Femur and Tibia , 1991 .

[24]  P. Corkery,et al.  FRACTURES OF THE SHAFT OF THE FEMUR , 1935, The British journal of clinical practice.

[25]  I. A. Ogden.  Femoral shaft fractures. , 1995, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.