Intravascular ultrasonography versus digital subtraction angiography: a human in vivo comparison of vessel size and morphology.

The accuracy of catheter-based intravascular ultrasonography to define luminal size in humans in vivo and its sensitivity to describe lesion morphology have not been previously reported. Vessel diameter, cross-sectional area and lesion characteristics assessed by digital subtraction angiography and intravascular ultrasonography (20 MHz) were compared in 86 human arterial segments. The same arterial segments were imaged and analyzed by digital subtraction angiography and intravascular ultrasonography at 49 femoral, 3 renal, 5 iliac, 7 pulmonary and 22 aortic sites. Digital subtraction angiographic diameter and area were determined geometrically by an automated algorithm. Intravascular ultrasonographic diameter and area were determined by planimetry. Linear correlation for diameter by the two techniques was 0.97, standard error of the estimate (SEE) = 1.83 mm, and for cross-sectional area it was 0.95, SEE = 0.65 cm2. Intravascular ultrasonography identified 24 sites in which plaque was present; 11 (46%) of these segments appeared normal by digital subtraction angiography. Conversely, digital subtraction angiography demonstrated irregularities in 18 segments of which 5 (28%) appeared normal by intravascular ultrasonography. These data indicate an excellent correlation between intravascular ultrasonography and digital subtraction angiography for in vivo assessment of human arterial dimensions in normal and minimally diseased segments. However, intravascular ultrasonography is more likely to identify atherosclerotic plaque that may be angiographically "silent."

[1]  N G Pandian,et al.  Ultrasound angioscopy: real-time, two-dimensional, intraluminal ultrasound imaging of blood vessels. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  R. Wilson,et al.  Prediction of the physiologic significance of coronary arterial lesions by quantitative lesion geometry in patients with limited coronary artery disease. , 1987, Circulation.

[3]  P. Yock,et al.  Two-dimensional intravascular ultrasound: technical development and initial clinical experience. , 1989, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[4]  M. LeFree,et al.  Automated quantitative coronary arteriography: morphologic and physiologic validation in vivo of a rapid digital angiographic method. , 1987, Circulation.

[5]  C T Lancée,et al.  Arterial wall characteristics determined by intravascular ultrasound imaging: an in vitro study. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  J. Griffith,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound cross-sectional arterial imaging before and after balloon angioplasty in vitro. , 1989, Circulation.

[7]  C. Grines,et al.  Application of a new phased-array ultrasound imaging catheter in the assessment of vascular dimensions. In vivo comparison to cineangiography. , 1990, Circulation.

[8]  C. White,et al.  Comparison by quantitative angiographic assessment of coronary stenoses of one view showing the severest narrowing to two orthogonal views. , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  T. Bashore,et al.  Accuracy of digital angiography for quantitation of normal coronary luminal segments in excised, perfused hearts. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  S. M. Collins,et al.  Visual estimates of percent diameter coronary stenosis: "a battered gold standard". , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  W. Roberts,et al.  Accuracy of Angiographic Determination of Left Main Coronary Arterial Narrowing: Angiographic‐Histologic Correlative Analysis in 28 Patients , 1981, Circulation.

[12]  J. J. Gerbrands,et al.  Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. , 1985, Circulation.