An Investigation into Constraints to Sustainable Vehicle Ownership: A Focus Group Study

Though most Americans hold pro-environmental attitudes, an attitudes-behavior gap exists with respect to vehicle ownership. Significant constraints appear to prevent most people with environmental concerns from buying smaller, more fuel-efficient, less-polluting vehicles. But researchers have only a simplistic understanding of what those constraints are and how individuals describe and react to them. This study explored these barriers in depth through a series of focus group discussions with 36 residents of the Sacramento, California, metropolitan region who held pro-environmental attitudes. Analysis of the focus group conversations revealed that the features of vehicles currently on the market, family and work responsibilities, residential choices, and routines and preferences all constrained participants’ vehicle purchase choices to ones which, more often than not, poorly reflect their environmental attitudes. The group conversations also revealed serious misunderstandings about the environmental impacts of owning and using vehicles that make it difficult for many to accurately assess their alternatives. For some participants, environmental concerns are unlikely to influence future vehicle purchase decisions, even if constraints were removed altogether; other priorities have taken and will take precedence over the environmental impacts of their choices. But for many participants, strategies to remove or weaken the identified constraints to owning smaller and more fuel-efficient vehicles could lead them to choose vehicles that would reduce their resource and energy consumption for personal transportation. Further research with a larger pool of subjects is needed to confirm whether the focus group findings apply to the larger population.

[1]  R E Kayser,et al.  Evaluation of a Dutch Educational “Driving While Intoxicated (DWI)” Prevention Program for Driving Schools , 1995, Journal of drug education.

[2]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Choice of Travel Mode in the Theory of Planned Behavior: The Roles of Past Behavior, Habit, and Reasoned Action , 2003 .

[3]  Reid R. Heffner,et al.  Symbolism in California’s Early Market for Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2007 .

[4]  Sandra Rosenbloom,et al.  How adult children in the UK and the US view the driving cessation of their parents: Is a policy window opening? , 2010 .

[5]  F. Kaiser,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDE AND ECOLOGICAL BEHAVIOUR , 1999 .

[6]  L. Rogers,et al.  Gaps in Mind: Problems in environmental knowledge-behaviour modelling research , 2002 .

[7]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Neighborhood design and vehicle type choice: Evidence from Northern California , 2006 .

[8]  L. Steg,et al.  The effects of motivational factors on car use: a multidisciplinary modelling approach , 2001 .

[9]  S. Handy,et al.  QUALITATIVE METHODS IN TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH , 2003 .

[10]  Glenda Wall Barriers to Individual Environmental Action: The Influence of Attitudes and Social Experiences† , 2008 .

[11]  D. Morgan Focus groups for qualitative research. , 1988, Hospital guest relations report.

[12]  Patricia L. Mokhtarian,et al.  What type of vehicle do people drive? The role of attitude and lifestyle in influencing vehicle type choice - eScholarship , 2004 .

[13]  M. Delucchi ENVIRONMENTAL EXTERNALITIES OF MOTOR-VEHICLE USE IN THE US. IN: THE AUTOMOBILE , 2000 .

[14]  B. Verplanken,et al.  Habit, information acquisition, and the process of making travel mode choices , 1997 .

[15]  Bradley Flamm,et al.  The impacts of environmental knowledge and attitudes on vehicle ownership and use , 2009 .

[16]  Kenneth Train,et al.  A disaggregate model of auto-type choice , 1979 .

[17]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  "Green" Transportation Taxes and Fees: A Survey of Californians , 2009 .

[18]  D. Hensher,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions and australian commuters’ attitudes and behavior concerning abatement policies and personal involvement , 1997 .

[19]  Caroline L. Noblet,et al.  Factors affecting consumer assessment of eco-labeled vehicles , 2006 .

[20]  Anaïs Rocci,et al.  De l'automobilité à la multimodalité? Analyse sociologique des freins et leviers au changement de comportements vers une réduction de l'usage de la voiture. Le cas de la région parisienne et perspective internationale. , 2007 .

[21]  Julia A. Jones,et al.  Road Ecology: Science and Solutions , 2002 .

[22]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Environmental Values in American Culture , 1995 .

[23]  Niki Harré,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF RISKY DRIVING IN ADOLESCENCE , 2000 .

[25]  R. Küller,et al.  Travel behaviour and environmental concern , 2000 .

[26]  Michael Murtaugh,et al.  A HIERARCHICAL DECISION-PROCESS MODEL FOR FORECASTING AUTOMOBILE TYPE-CHOICE , 1980 .

[27]  H. Aarts,et al.  THE AUTOMATIC ACTIVATION OF GOAL-DIRECTED BEHAVIOUR: THE CASE OF TRAVEL HABIT , 2000 .

[28]  Carmen Tanner,et al.  CONSTRAINTS ON ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOUR , 1999 .

[29]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[30]  N. Henley,et al.  'A drop in the bucket': Collective efficacy perceptions and environmental behaviour , 2008 .

[31]  A. Kollmuss,et al.  Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? , 2002 .

[32]  C. Vlek,et al.  Measurement and Determinants of Environmentally Significant Consumer Behavior , 2002 .

[33]  R. Kitamura,et al.  A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area , 1997 .