Nonlinear dynamic analysis of disordered voice: the relationship between the correlation dimension (D2) and pre-/post-treatment change in perceived dysphonia severity.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of nonlinear dynamic analysis methods, including phase space portraits and measures of the correlation dimension (D(2)) to predict pre- versus post-treatment change in perceived dysphonia severity in a group of 88 patients with muscle tension dysphonia (MTD). Pre- and posttreatment vowel samples from 88 women with primary MTD (mean age=46.2 years; standard deviation=13.1) were selected for analysis (176 voice samples in total). Phase space reconstructions and correlation dimensions were computed to describe the nonlinear dynamic characteristics of all voice samples. Ten blinded listeners were asked to rate the vowel samples for severity of dysphonia using a 100-point visual analog scale (VAS). In the computation of D(2) results, 22 severely dysphonic pretreatment voice samples were not analyzed, as a finite value for the correlation dimension could not be computed. For the remaining pre-/post-treatment voice samples, a significant difference in the correlation dimension (D(2)) between the pre- versus post-treatment voice samples was observed; however, D(2) was poorly correlated with changes in perceived dysphonia severity ratings after treatment (r=0.244, P=0.056). Thus, the utility of the correlation dimension (D(2)) as a treatment-outcome measure and as a measure of dysphonia that may strongly relate to perceived dysphonia severity does not appear to be supported, particularly for pretreatment voices that may have increased levels of dysphonia severity. Instead, the strength of nonlinear dynamic methods may potentially reside in providing some insight into the theoretical rules or initial conditions that may result in different modes of normal or disordered phonation.

[1]  P. Carding,et al.  The Clinical Features of Functional Dysphonia , 2001, The Laryngoscope.

[2]  K. McGraw,et al.  Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1996 .

[3]  D M Bless,et al.  Manual circumlaryngeal therapy for functional dysphonia: an evaluation of short- and long-term treatment outcomes. , 1997, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[4]  Jack J. Jiang,et al.  Comparison of nonlinear dynamic methods and perturbation methods for voice analysis. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  S. Awan The voice diagnostic protocol : a practical guide to the diagnosis of voice disorders , 2001 .

[6]  S. Awan,et al.  The effect of anchor modality on the reliability of vocal severity ratings. , 2009, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[7]  G. de Krom,et al.  Consistency and reliability of voice quality ratings for different types of speech fragments. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[8]  R. Epstein,et al.  Functional voice disorders , 1983, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[9]  J. Kreiman,et al.  Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: review, tutorial, and a framework for future research. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[10]  Shaheen N Awan,et al.  Toward the development of an objective index of dysphonia severity: A four‐factor acoustic model , 2006, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[11]  D. Bless,et al.  Manual circumlaryngeal techniques in the assessment and treatment of voice disorders , 1998 .

[12]  James Theiler,et al.  Estimating fractal dimension , 1990 .

[13]  Edwin M-L Yiu,et al.  The effect of anchors and training on the reliability of perceptual voice evaluation. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[14]  Jack J. Jiang,et al.  Perturbation and nonlinear dynamic analyses of voices from patients with unilateral laryngeal paralysis. , 2005, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[15]  P. Grassberger,et al.  Measuring the Strangeness of Strange Attractors , 1983 .

[16]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[17]  F. Takens Detecting strange attractors in turbulence , 1981 .

[18]  N. Roy,et al.  Acoustic prediction of voice type in women with functional dysphonia. , 2005, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[19]  D. Berry,et al.  Analysis of vocal disorders with methods from nonlinear dynamics. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[20]  Fraser,et al.  Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information. , 1986, Physical review. A, General physics.

[21]  A. Giovanni,et al.  Nonlinear behavior of vocal fold vibration: the role of coupling between the vocal folds. , 1999, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[22]  Jack J Jiang,et al.  Chaos in voice, from modeling to measurement. , 2006, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[23]  J Kreiman,et al.  Comparison of voice analysis systems for perturbation measurement. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[24]  C R Rabinov,et al.  Comparing reliability of perceptual ratings of roughness and acoustic measure of jitter. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[25]  Jack J Jiang,et al.  Nonlinear dynamics of phonations in excised larynx experiments. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  A. Behrman,et al.  Correlation dimension of electroglottographic data from healthy and pathologic subjects. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  L. Schalén,et al.  Differential diagnosis and treatment of psychogenic voice disorder. , 1992, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[28]  G. Williams Chaos theory tamed , 1997 .

[29]  J Kreiman,et al.  Comparing internal and external standards in voice quality judgments. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[30]  J. Koufman,et al.  Functional voice disorders. , 1991, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[31]  Antoine Giovanni,et al.  Objective Voice Analysis in Dysphonic Patients: New Data Including Nonlinear Measurements , 2006, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

[32]  C. Baylor,et al.  The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice. , 2006, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.