A study of the liquefaction risk potential at Yuanlin, Taiwan

Abstract The method by Iwasaki et al. [Iwasaki, T., Arakawa, T., Tokida, K., 1982. Simplified procedures for assessing soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Proceedings of the Conference on Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Southampton, UK, pp. 925–939] for evaluating the liquefaction failure potential is widely used in Japan, Taiwan, and other countries due to its ease of use and general applicability. In this method, an index, called the Liquefaction Potential Index (IL), is calculated based on an integration of the calculated factor of safety (Fs) over depth with a weighting function. Iwasaki et al. (1982) provided a set of criteria to interpret the calculated index IL based on a calibration with his dataset of field performance cases. However, in their method, the factor of safety (Fs) is based on the liquefaction evaluation method adopted in the Japanese Highway Bridge Design Code [JSHE, 1990. Highway Bridge Design Guide Book. Japan Society of Highway Engineering, in Japanese]. Whether other liquefaction evaluation methods can be used in conjunction with the index IL or not needs further investigation. In this paper, the Cone Penetration Test (CPT) data from Yuanlin, Taiwan, the area that suffered the most from liquefaction in the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake, are analyzed. Three CPT-based methods are used for the calculation of the factor of safety for these cases derived from the Chi-Chi earthquake. These factors of safety are used to define the liquefaction potential and risk indexes. The calculated indexes are then used to construct the failure potential maps, and these maps are checked with the field observations. The study shows that the Liquefaction Risk Index (IR) defined in conjunction with the Juang et al. [Juang, C.H., Yuan, H., Lee, D.H., Lin, P.S., 2003. Simplified CPT-based method for evaluating liquefaction potential of soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 66–80] method yields the best result in interpreting field observations.

[1]  Toru Shibata,et al.  EVALUATION OF LIQUEFACTION POTENTIALS OF SOILS USING CONE PENETRATION TESTS , 1988 .

[2]  Peter K. Robertson,et al.  Liquefaction Potential of Sands Using the CPT , 1985 .

[3]  L. Ishihara,et al.  Stability of Natural Deposits during Earthquakes , 1985 .

[4]  I. M. Idriss,et al.  SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE FOR EVALUATING SOIL LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL , 1971 .

[5]  R. S. Olsen.  Using the CPT for Dynamic Site Response Characterization , 1988 .

[6]  Timothy D. Stark,et al.  Liquefaction Resistance Using CPT and Field Case Histories , 1995 .

[7]  Toshio Iwasaki,et al.  Simplified procedures for assessing soil liquefaction during earthquakes , 1984 .

[8]  K. Ishihara.  Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes. , 1993 .

[9]  W. F. Marcuson,et al.  Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils , 2001 .

[10]  C. Ho,et al.  臺灣地質概論 : 臺灣地質圖説明書 = An introduction to the geology of Taiwan : explanatory text of the geologic map of Taiwan , 1975 .

[11]  C. H. Juang,et al.  CPT-based liquefaction analysis, Part 1: Determination of limit state function , 2000 .

[12]  C. Hsein Juang,et al.  Calibration of SPT- and CPT-Based Liquefaction Evaluation Methods , 2000 .

[13]  Ping-Sien Lin,et al.  Simplified cone penetration test-based method for evaluating liquefaction resistance of soils , 2003 .

[14]  Robert V. Whitman,et al.  Regression Models For Evaluating Liquefaction Probability , 1988 .

[15]  C. Hsein Juang,et al.  Probabilistic Framework for Liquefaction Potential by Shear Wave Velocity , 2001 .

[16]  P. Robertson,et al.  Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test , 1998 .

[17]  C. Hsein Juang,et al.  Assessing CPT-based methods for liquefaction evaluation with emphasis on the cases from the Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake , 2002 .