Objectives—To evaluate whether surface characteristics (absorption level (g-max), material) and the height of play equipment are related to the occurrence and severity of injuries from falls. Setting and methods—During the summers of 1991 and 1995, conformity of play equipment to Canadian standards was assessed in a random sample (n=102) of Montreal public playgrounds. Surface absorption (g-max) was tested using a Max Hic instrument and the height of equipment was measured. Concurrently, all injuries presenting at the emergency department of Montreal's two children's hospitals were recorded and parents were interviewed. Inspected equipment was implicated in 185 injuries. The g-max measurements (1995 only) were available for 110 of these playground accidents. Results—One third of falls (35 %) occurred on a surface exceeding 200 g and the risk of injury was three times greater than for g level lower than 150 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.45 to 6.35). On surfaces having absorption levels between 150 g and 200 g, injuries were 1.8 times more likely (95% CI 0.91 to 3.57). Injuries were 2.56 times more likely to occur on equipment higher than 2 m compared with equipment lower than 1.5 m. Analysis of risk factors by severity of injury failed to show any positive relationships between the g-max or height and severity, whereas surface material was a good predictor of severity. Conclusions—This study confirms the relationships between risk of injury, surface resilience, and height of equipment, as well as between type of material and severity of injury. Our data suggest that acceptable limits for surface resilience be set at less than 200 g, and perhaps even less than 150 g, and not exceed 2 m for equipment height. These findings reinforce the importance of installing recommended materials, such as sand, beneath play equipment.
[1]
V. R. Hodgson,et al.
Testing the Validity and Limitations of the Severity Index
,
1970
.
[2]
J D Langley,et al.
Height and surfacing as risk factors for injury in falls from playground equipment: a case-control study.
,
1996,
Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.
[3]
J. Sacks,et al.
Playground hazards in Atlanta child care centers.
,
1990,
American journal of public health.
[4]
Ahmad Husseini,et al.
Canadian standards association
,
1993
.
[5]
Y. Robitaille,et al.
Does play equipment conform to the Canadian standard?
,
1995,
Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.
[6]
George W. Rutherford.
HIA Hazard Analysis: Injuries Associated with Public Playground Equipment.
,
1979
.
[7]
Richard G. Snyder,et al.
A BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF HEAD IMPACT INJURIES TO CHILDREN
,
1979
.
[8]
J. Sibert,et al.
Patterns of injuries to children on public playgrounds.
,
1994,
Archives of disease in childhood.
[9]
M. Mackay.
Playground injuries
,
2003,
New York state journal of medicine.
[10]
T. Nolan,et al.
Epidemiology of non‐intentional injuries in an Australian urban region: Results from injury surveillance
,
1992,
Journal of paediatrics and child health.