Endogenizing the probability of nuclear exit in an optimal power-generation mix model

A major accident at a nuclear power reactor can lower public acceptance of this energy source and may result in a nuclear exit. This paper proposes an optimal power-generation planning model that deals explicitly with the costs involved in changing the power-generation mix due to a nuclear exit. The model introduces the probability of a major accident leading to a nuclear exit at a future time period as an endogenous variable, which is determined depending on the amount of nuclear power being generated during the preceding period. The proposed model is formulated as a stochastic programming problem that aims to minimize the expected value of overall power-generation costs computed with a weighted probability of every future state, branched according to a possible nuclear exit at each time period. An application of the model quantitatively implies that less nuclear dependency is optimal for a higher assumed frequency of a major accident per generated unit of electrical energy from nuclear—not only for the cost of direct damage from the accident, but largely because of the increased cost of overall power generation due to the subsequent nuclear exit. To put it differently, lowering the frequency of a major nuclear accident per reactor·year brings benefits exceeding the conventionally perceived effect of reducing an accident's direct damage. Lowering the major accident frequency to one per 106 reactor·years would free the optimal planning of future electricity supply from influence of an accident causing nuclear exit, if the geographical scale of the exit were limited to one-twentieth of the entire world.

[1]  Galen Barbose,et al.  Tracking the Sun VII: An Historical Summary of the Installed Price of Photovoltaics in the United States from 1998 to 2013 , 2012 .

[2]  Luis E. Echavarri,et al.  The future of nuclear power , 2013 .

[3]  Bob van der Zwaan,et al.  The role of nuclear power in mitigating emissions from electricity generation , 2013 .

[4]  Larry Hughes,et al.  The effects of event occurrence and duration on resilience and adaptation in energy systems , 2015 .

[5]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Future nuclear perspectives based on MESSAGE integrated assessment modeling , 2013 .

[6]  Pranjal Sarmah,et al.  Energy and exergy based performance analyses of a solid oxide fuel cell integrated combined cycle power plant , 2014 .

[7]  蘇 宣銘,et al.  Study on Reducing Nuclear Dependence in Post-Fukushima Japan , 2013 .

[8]  Socrates Kypreos,et al.  Internalisation of external cost in the power generation sector: Analysis with Global Multi-regional MARKAL model , 2007 .

[9]  Robert J. Brecha,et al.  Economics of nuclear power and climate change mitigation policies , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Why have some people changed their attitudes toward nuclear power after the accident in Fukushima , 2014 .

[11]  Louis Eeckhoudt,et al.  Risk aversion and the external cost of a nuclear accident , 2000 .

[12]  Paul L. Joskow,et al.  The Future of Nuclear Power After Fukushima , 2012 .

[13]  Takanobu Kosugi,et al.  Internalization of the external costs of global environmental damage in an integrated assessment model , 2009 .

[14]  T. Dixon,et al.  Global potential for biomass and carbon dioxide capture, transport and storage up to 2050 , 2012 .

[15]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Profiling technological failure and disaster in the energy sector: A comparative analysis of historical energy accidents , 2015 .

[16]  Yuki Ishiwatari,et al.  Cost per severe accident as an index for severe accident consequence assessment and its applications , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  Caroline Jorant The implications of Fukushima , 2011 .

[18]  Aie,et al.  Energy Technology Perspectives 2010 , 2009 .

[19]  Seth Sheldon,et al.  Beyond carbon: Quantifying environmental externalities as energy for hydroelectric and nuclear power , 2015 .

[20]  Isabel Soares,et al.  The technological and environmental efficiency of the EU-27 power mix: An evaluation based on MPT , 2014 .

[21]  Aie World Energy Outlook 2011 , 2001 .

[22]  Yan Xu,et al.  Nonlinear integrated resource strategic planning model and case study in China's power sector planning , 2014 .

[23]  William D'haeseleer,et al.  Impact of The German Nuclear Phase-Out on Europe's Electricity Generation - a Comprehensive Study , 2013 .

[24]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  Nuclear exit, the US energy mix, and carbon dioxide emissions , 2013 .

[25]  Arne Stolbjerg Drud,et al.  CONOPT - A Large-Scale GRG Code , 1994, INFORMS J. Comput..

[26]  Katja Schumacher,et al.  Costs of meeting international climate targets without nuclear power , 2013 .

[27]  Sanghyun Hong,et al.  Evaluating options for sustainable energy mixes in South Korea using scenario analysis , 2013 .

[28]  Amir Ahmadi-Javid,et al.  Integrated multiperiod power generation and transmission expansion planning with sustainability aspects in a stochastic environment , 2015 .

[29]  Enrica De Cian,et al.  Innovation benefits from nuclear phase-out: can they compensate the costs? , 2013, Climatic Change.

[30]  Aie,et al.  World Energy Outlook 2013 , 2013 .

[31]  Alexei G. Sankovski,et al.  Special report on emissions scenarios , 2000 .

[32]  Larry Hughes,et al.  The Fukushima nuclear accident and its effect on global energy security , 2013 .

[33]  Yasumasa Fujii,et al.  Assessment of Japan's Optimal Power Generation Mix Considering Massive Deployment of Variable Renewable Power Generation , 2013 .

[34]  V. Amavilah,et al.  The influence of oil and coal prices on world uranium demand , 1994 .

[35]  Zsuzsanna Csereklyei,et al.  Measuring the impact of nuclear accidents on energy policy , 2013 .

[36]  Ari Rabl,et al.  External costs of nuclear: Greater or less than the alternatives? , 2013 .

[37]  Toshihiko Nakata,et al.  Analysis of the impacts of nuclear phase-out on energy systems in Japan , 2002 .

[38]  David A. Kendrick,et al.  GAMS : a user's guide, Release 2.25 , 1992 .

[39]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Economic and environmental analysis of power generation expansion in Japan considering Fukushima nuclear accident using a multi-objective optimization model , 2012 .

[40]  Hal Turton,et al.  Cost of ad-hoc nuclear policy uncertainties in the evolution of the Swiss electricity system , 2012 .

[41]  Takanobu Kosugi,et al.  Evaluation of lifecycle CO2 emissions from the Japanese electric power sector in the 21st century under various nuclear scenarios , 2006 .

[42]  Quan Wen,et al.  IRSP (integrated resource strategic planning) with interconnected smart grids in integrating renewable energy and implementing DSM (demand side management) in China , 2014 .

[43]  Paul L. Joskow,et al.  The economic future of nuclear power , 2009, Daedalus.

[44]  Takanobu Kosugi,et al.  Fail-safe solar radiation management geoengineering , 2013, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.