Analogical Transfer in Problem Solving

When people encounter a novel problem, they might be reminded of a problem they solved previously, retrieve its solution, and use it, possibly with some adaptation, to solve the novel problem. This sequence of events, or “problem-solving transfer,” has important cognitive benefits: It saves the effort needed for derivation of new solutions and may allow people to solve problems they wouldn't know to solve otherwise. Of course, the cognitive benefits of problem-solving transfer are limited to the case in which people retrieve and apply a solution to an analogous problem that, indeed, can help them solve the novel problem ( positive transfer ). But people might be also reminded of and attempt to transfer a solution to a nonanalogous problem ( negative transfer ) and thereby waste their cognitive resources or arrive at an erroneous solution. The challenge facing researchers and educators is to identify the conditions that promote positive and deter negative problem-solving transfer. In this chapter, I describe how researchers who study analogical transfer address this challenge. Specifically, I describe work that examined how problem similarity affects transfer performance and how people determine whether the learned and the novel problems are similar. Throughout the chapter I highlight the relevance of research on analogical transfer to instructional contexts and illustrate the main concepts and findings with examples of mathematical word problems. SIMILARITY IN SURFACE AND STRUCTURE As in every other case of learning generalization, the main variable that mediates problem-solving transfer is the degree of similarity between the learned ( base ) and novel ( target ) problems.

[1]  D. Gentner,et al.  Structural Alignment during Similarity Comparisons , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  B. Ross This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects. , 1987 .

[3]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  MAC/FAC: A Model of Similarity-Based Retrieval , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  I. Begg,et al.  Problem-oriented training promotes spontaneous analogical transfer: Memory-oriented training promotes memory for training , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[5]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Schema induction and analogical transfer , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  Ann L. Brown Analogical learning and transfer: what develops? , 1989 .

[7]  M. Bassok Transfer of domain-specific problem-solving procedures , 1990 .

[8]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Analogical problem solving , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  H. Simon,et al.  Why are some problems hard? Evidence from Tower of Hanoi , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Interdomain Transfer Between Isomorphic Topics in Algebra and Physics , 1989 .

[11]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Mathematical problem solving by analogy. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  R. Weisberg,et al.  Context-dependent effects on analogical transfer , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[13]  M. McCloskey Naive Theories of Motion. , 1982 .

[14]  Laura R. Novick,et al.  Component processes in analogical transfer: Mapping, pattern completion, and adaptation. , 1994 .

[15]  Eva Teubal,et al.  Verbal cues as an interfering factor in verbal problem solving , 1975 .

[16]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Frequency norms and structural analysis of algebra story problems into families, categories, and templates , 1981 .

[17]  D. Medin,et al.  The specific character of abstract thought: Categorization, problem-solving, and induction: Volume 5 , 1989 .

[18]  J. Lave Cognition in Practice: Outdoors: a social anthropology of cognition in practice , 1988 .

[19]  D. Gentner,et al.  Respects for similarity , 1993 .

[20]  John E. Hummel,et al.  Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. , 1997 .

[21]  B. Ross Distinguishing Types of Superficial Similarities: Different Effects on the Access and Use of Earlier Problems , 1989 .

[22]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Illuminating Mental Representations Through Speech and Gesture , 1999 .

[23]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  A structure-mapping model for word problems. , 1987 .

[24]  Miriam Bassok,et al.  OBJECT-BASED REPRESENTATIONS : TRANSFER BETWEEN CASES OF CONTINUOUS AND DISCRETE MODELS OF CHANGE , 1995 .

[25]  W Kintsch,et al.  Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems. , 1985, Psychological review.

[26]  Keith J. Holyoak,et al.  The Pragmatics of Analogical Transfer , 1985 .

[27]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  A schema-based theory of transfer. , 1996 .

[28]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[29]  Keith J. Holyoak,et al.  Pragmatic knowledge and conceptual structure: determinants of transfer between quantitative domains , 1993 .

[30]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Understanding written problem instructions. , 1974 .

[31]  M. Bassok,et al.  Judging a book by its cover: Interpretative effects of content on problem-solving transfer , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[32]  K. Duncker,et al.  On problem-solving , 1945 .

[33]  Brian Falkenhainer,et al.  The Structure-Mapping Engine: Algorithm and Examples , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[34]  N. Maier,et al.  Response availability as a factor in the problem-solving performance of males and females. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  Matthew W. Lewis,et al.  Self-Explonations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[36]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  The role of analogy in transfer between similar problem states , 1974 .

[37]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Usefulness of analogous solutions for solving algebra word problems. , 1985 .

[38]  K. Dunbar The analogical paradox: Why analogy is so easy in naturalistic settings yet so difficult in the psychological laboratory. , 2001 .

[39]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. , 1989 .

[40]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  ANALOGICAL REMINDING: A GOOD MATCH IS HARD TO FIND. , 1985 .

[41]  D. Gentner,et al.  Systematicity and Surface Similarity in the Development of Analogy. Technical Report No. 358. , 1985 .

[42]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[43]  Mary L. Gick,et al.  Learning from mistakes: Inducing analogous solution failures to a source problem produces later successes in analogical transfer , 1992 .

[44]  Miriam Bassok,et al.  Adding Apples and Oranges: Alignment of Semantic and Formal Knowledge , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[45]  B. Ross,et al.  Generalizing from the use of earlier examples in problem solving , 1990 .

[46]  B. Ross Remindings and their effects in learning a cognitive skill , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[47]  David W. Carraher,et al.  Street mathematics and school mathematics , 1993 .

[48]  Paul Thagard,et al.  Analog Wetrieval by Constraint Satisfaction , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[49]  D. Gentner Structure‐Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy* , 1983 .

[50]  Keith J Holyoak,et al.  Pragmatic reasoning schemas , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[51]  R. Catrambone Improving examples to improve transfer to novel problems , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[52]  J. LeFevre,et al.  Do Written Instructions Need Examples , 1986 .

[53]  Paul Thagard,et al.  Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[54]  Lauretta M. Reeves,et al.  The Role of Content and Abstract Information in Analogical Transfer , 1994 .

[55]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Learning from Examples Via Self-Explanations , 1988, Knowing, Learning, and Instruction.

[56]  L. R. Novick Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.