Measurement of Urinary Bladder Pressure: A Comparison of Methods

Pressure is an essential parameter for the normal function of almost all organs in the human body. Measurement of pressure is therefore highly important in clinical practice and medical research. In clinical practice, pressures are often measured indirectly through a fluid line where the pressure is transmitted from the organ of interest to a remote, externally localized transducer. This method has several limitations and is prone to artefacts from movements. Results from an in vitro bench study comparing the characteristics of two different sensor systems for bladder assessment are presented; a new cystometry system using a MEMS-based in-target organ sensor was compared with a conventional system using water-filled lines connected to external transducers. Robustness to measurement errors due to patient movement was investigated through response to forced vibrations. While the new cystometry system detected real changes in applied pressure for excitation frequencies ranging from 5 Hz to 25 Hz, such small and high-frequency stimuli were not transmitted through the water-filled line connected to the external transducer. The new sensor system worked well after a resilient test at frequencies up to 70 Hz. The in-target organ sensor system will offer new possibilities for long-term monitoring of in vivo pressure in general. This opens up the possibility for future personalized medical treatment and renders possible new health services and, thereby, an increased patient empowerment and quality of life.

[1]  Horst Richter,et al.  Initial investigations on systems for measuring intraocular pressure , 2000 .

[2]  Ingelin Clausen,et al.  A miniaturized pressure sensor with inherent biofouling protection designed for in vivo applications , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[3]  S Hunskaar,et al.  A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Trøndelag. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  H. Coakham,et al.  Telemetric Implantable Pressure Sensor for Short- and Long-Term Monitoring of Intracranial Pressure , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[5]  Thomas Schmitz-Rode,et al.  A Novel Fully Implantable Wireless Sensor System for Monitoring Hypertension Patients , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  A. Vogl,et al.  The effect of true human synovial fluid on the functionality of an in vivo pressure sensor element , 2013, 2013 IEEE SENSORS.

[7]  P. Rosier,et al.  ICS teaching module: Artefacts in urodynamic pressure traces (basic module) , 2017, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[8]  P. Rosier,et al.  ICS teaching module: Cystometry (basic module) , 2017, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[9]  Ingelin Clausen,et al.  An in vivo MEMS sensor system for percutaneous measurement of urinary bladder , 2017, 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[10]  O. Raz,et al.  Urodynamic testing: physiological background, setting‐up, calibration and artefacts , 2014, BJU international.

[11]  J. Johansson,et al.  Urinary incontinence—prevalence, impact on daily living and desire for treatmentA population‐based study , 2004, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology.