Minutiae-based partial fingerprint recognition

Although fingerprint matching based on minutia features is a well researched problem in the field of automatic fingerprint recognition, it is still an unsolved problem presenting many research challenges. Many algorithms have been proposed to match a pair of minutia templates of fingerprints. Most of these algorithms assume that the two templates are approximately of the same size. This assumption is no longer valid. The need for recognition of partial fingerprints is increasing in both forensic and civilian applications. In forensics, latent fingerprints lifted from crime scenes are often noisy and broken, thus the usable portions are small and partial. In civilian applications, the invention of small hand-held devices, such as mobile phones, PDAs, and miniaturized fingerprint sensors present considerable demands on partial fingerprints processing. Miniaturization of fingerprint sensors has led to small sensing areas varying from 1.0"x1.0" to 0.42"x0.42". However, fingerprint scanners with a sensing area smaller than 1.0"x1.0", which is considered to be the average fingerprint size (as required by FBI specifications), can only capture partial fingerprints. Matching partial fingerprints against full pre-enrolled images in the database presents several problems: (i) the number of minutia points available in such partial fingerprints is few, thus reducing its discriminating power; (ii) loss of singular points (core and delta) is likely and therefore, a robust algorithm independent of these singularities is required; (iii) uncontrolled impression environments result in unspecified orientations of partial fingerprints; and (iv) the skin elasticity and humidity can cause distortions which increase the ambiguity between genuine and imposter samples. Generally, a fingerprint based biometrics system is considered as highly secure, and is equivalent to a long password system. However, with the decreasing number of features on a small fingerprint and the non-exact matching nature, the security strength of a partial fingerprint recognition reduces. The relation between the acquired fingerprint size and the security strength plays a key role in designing a fingerprint recognition system and is needed to be studied. In this dissertation, we present: (i) two novel minutiae based fingerprint matching methods to overcome the challenges encountered by partial fingerprint recognition and (ii) a study of the security vulnerability of partial fingerprint recognition systems.

[1]  Vedat Tavsanoglu,et al.  Fingerprint Image Enhancement Using CNN Filtering Techniques , 2003, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[2]  P.V.C. Hough,et al.  Machine Analysis of Bubble Chamber Pictures , 1959 .

[3]  Nalini K. Ratha,et al.  An Analysis of Minutiae Matching Strength , 2001, AVBPA.

[4]  Venu Govindaraju,et al.  Chain Code Processing for Handwritten Word Recognition , 1997 .

[5]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Fingerprint Image Enhancement: Algorithm and Performance Evaluation , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[6]  Bülent Sankur,et al.  Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation , 2004, J. Electronic Imaging.

[7]  W. Herschel Skin Furrows of the Hand , 1880, Nature.

[8]  Louis Coetzee,et al.  Fingerprint recognition in low quality images , 1993, Pattern Recognit..

[9]  Paul C. K. Kwok,et al.  A thinning algorithm by contour generation , 1988, CACM.

[10]  Xudong Jiang,et al.  Fingerprint minutiae matching based on the local and global structures , 2000, Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000.

[11]  Gabriella Sanniti di Baja,et al.  A Width-Independent Fast Thinning Algorithm , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[12]  Joseph M. Cychosz Efficient Binary Image Thinning Using Neighborhood Maps , 1994, Graphics Gems.

[13]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Point pattern matching by relaxation , 1980, Pattern Recognit..

[14]  Robert S. Germain,et al.  Fingerprint matching using transformation parameter clustering , 1997 .

[15]  Richard M. Karp,et al.  Theoretical Improvements in Algorithmic Efficiency for Network Flow Problems , 1972, Combinatorial Optimization.

[16]  John I. Thornton,et al.  A Critical Analysis of Quantitative Fingerprint Individuality Models , 1986 .

[17]  Kuo-Chin Fan,et al.  Fingerprint ridge allocation in direct gray-scale domain , 2001, Pattern Recognit..

[18]  Øivind Due Trier,et al.  Evaluation of Binarization Methods for Document Images , 1995, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[19]  Orit Baruch Line thinning by line following , 1988, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[20]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition , 2005, Springer Professional Computing.

[21]  W. E. Engeler,et al.  Fingerprint image processing using neural networks , 1990, IEEE TENCON'90: 1990 IEEE Region 10 Conference on Computer and Communication Systems. Conference Proceedings.

[22]  Ronald L. Rivest,et al.  Introduction to Algorithms , 1990 .

[23]  Jan Olszewski,et al.  A noniterative thinning algorithm , 1994, TOMS.

[24]  Namiko Ikeda,et al.  Fingerprint image enhancement by pixel-parallel processing , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[25]  D. R. Fulkerson,et al.  Flows in Networks. , 1964 .

[26]  Dennis Gabor,et al.  Theory of communication , 1946 .

[27]  Alan Mink,et al.  Multimodal biometrics: issues in design and testing , 2003, ICMI '03.

[28]  Ge Yu,et al.  An optimization-based approach to image binarization , 2004, The Fourth International Conference onComputer and Information Technology, 2004. CIT '04..

[29]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[30]  Fang-Hsuan Cheng,et al.  Fast algorithm for point pattern matching: Invariant to translations, rotations and scale changes , 1997, Pattern Recognit..

[31]  Arun Ross,et al.  Information fusion in biometrics , 2003, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[32]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  A Real-Time Matching System for Large Fingerprint Databases , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..