A novel TOF-PET MRI detector for diagnosis and follow up of the prostate cancer

Abstract.Prostate cancer is the most common disease in men and the second leading cause of death from cancer. Generic large imaging instruments used in cancer diagnosis have sensitivity, spatial resolution, and contrast which are inadequate for the task of imaging details of a small organ such as the prostate. In addition, multimodality imaging can play a significant role in merging anatomical and functional details coming from simultaneous PET and MRI. Indeed, multiparametric PET/MRI was demonstrated to improve diagnosis, but it suffers from too many false positives. In order to address the above limits of the current techniques, we have proposed, built and tested, thanks to the TOPEM project funded by Italian National Institute of Nuclear Phisics, a prototype of an endorectal PET-TOF/MRI probe. In the applied magnification PET geometry, performance is dominated by a high-resolution detector placed closer to the source. The expected spatial resolution in the selected geometry is about 1.5mm FWHM and efficiency of a factor 2 with respect to what was obtained with the conventional PET scanner. In our experimental studies, we have obtained a timing resolution of ∼ 320 ps FWHM and at the same time a Depth of Interaction (DOI) resolution of under 1mm. Tests also showed that mutual adverse PET-MR effects are minimal. In addition, the matching endorectal RF coil was designed, built and tested. In the next planned studies, we expect that benefiting from the further progress in scintillator crystal surface treatment, in SiPM technology and associated electronics would allow us to significantly improve TOF resolution.

[1]  Jian Zhou,et al.  Theoretical analysis and simulation study of a high-resolution zoom-in PET system. , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Emilie Niaf,et al.  Influence of imaging and histological factors on prostate cancer detection and localisation on multiparametric MRI: a prospective study , 2013, European Radiology.

[3]  Yuan-Chuan Tai,et al.  Micro Insert: A Prototype Full-Ring PET Device for Improving the Image Resolution of a Small-Animal PET Scanner , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  Karin Haustermans,et al.  Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer localization in correlation to whole‐mount histopathology , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  Joseph A. O'Sullivan,et al.  A Feasibility Study of a Prototype PET Insert Device to Convert a General-Purpose Animal PET Scanner to Higher Resolution , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  J. Varela,et al.  A 64-channel ASIC for TOFPET applications , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[7]  P B Hoffer,et al.  Computerized three-dimensional segmented human anatomy. , 1994, Medical physics.

[8]  Spencer L Bowen,et al.  Simulation study of spatial resolution and sensitivity for the tapered depth of interaction PET detectors for small animal imaging , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy. , 2013, European urology.

[10]  J F Oliver,et al.  Study of a high-resolution PET system using a silicon detector probe. , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Joseph A. O'Sullivan,et al.  Virtual-Pinhole PET , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  M E Phelps,et al.  Positron emission tomography provides molecular imaging of biological processes. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  A. Wetter,et al.  Molecular Research in Urology 2014: Update on PET/MR Imaging of the Prostate , 2014, International journal of molecular sciences.

[14]  J. Qi,et al.  Characterization of a PET camera optimized for prostate imaging , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[15]  Neal H. Clinthorne,et al.  Investigation of an internal PET probe for prostate imaging , 2007 .

[16]  A. Studen,et al.  Evaluation of a high resolution silicon PET insert module. , 2015, Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment.

[17]  R. R. Raylman,et al.  Construction and Evaluation of a Prototype High Resolution, Silicon Photomultiplier-Based, Tandem Positron Emission Tomography System , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[18]  W. W. Moses,et al.  An LSO scintillator array for a PET detector module with depth of interaction measurement , 2000 .

[19]  Yuan-Chuan Tai,et al.  Improving PET imaging for breast cancer using virtual pinhole PET half-ring insert , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  M Bolla,et al.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. , 2001, European urology.

[21]  P R Luijten,et al.  Improving SNR and B1 transmit field for an endorectal coil in 7 T MRI and MRS of prostate cancer , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  J. Karp,et al.  Design considerations for a limited angle, dedicated breast, TOF PET scanner , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[23]  R. Bugalho,et al.  TOFPET ASIC for PET applications , 2013 .

[24]  Paolo Finocchiaro,et al.  Assessment of a high-resolution candidate detector for prostate time-of-flight positron emission tomography. , 2012, The Review of scientific instruments.

[25]  Jelle O. Barentsz,et al.  Local staging of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis , 2002, European Radiology.

[26]  J. Maalmi,et al.  Single photoelectron timing resolution of SiPM as a function of the bias voltage, the wavelength and the temperature , 2012 .

[27]  F. Loddo,et al.  TOPEM: A PET-TOF endorectal probe, compatible with MRI for diagnosis and follow up of prostate cancer , 2013 .

[28]  Hashim U. Ahmed,et al.  Defining the level of evidence for technology adoption in the localized prostate cancer pathway , 2014, Urologic oncology.

[29]  W. Moses Time of flight in PET revisited , 2003 .

[30]  Sang-June Park,et al.  Design of a very high-resolution small animal PET scanner using a silicon scatter detector insert , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  J. Qi,et al.  Initial Results of a Positron Tomograph for Prostate Imaging , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[32]  Peter Choyke,et al.  Challenges in clinical prostate cancer: role of imaging. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[33]  Jelle O. Barentsz,et al.  Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal–pelvic phased-array coils , 2007, European Radiology.

[34]  M. V. Nemallapudi,et al.  Sub-100 ps coincidence time resolution for positron emission tomography with LSO:Ce codoped with Ca , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  Suleman Surti,et al.  Benefit of Time-of-Flight in PET: Experimental and Clinical Results , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[36]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Comparison of endorectal coil and nonendorectal coil T2W and diffusion‐weighted MRI at 3 Tesla for localizing prostate cancer: Correlation with whole‐mount histopathology , 2014, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.