Toward a Science of Autonomy for Physical Systems: Service

Our lives have been immensely improved by decades of automation research -- we are more comfortable, more productive and safer than ever before. Just imagine a world where familiar automation technologies have failed. In that world, thermostats don't work -- you have to monitor your home heating system manually. Cruise control for your car doesn't exist. Every elevator has to have a human operator to hit the right floor, most manufactured products are assembled by hand, and you have to wash your own dishes. Who would willingly adopt that world -- the world of last century -- today? Physical systems -- elevators, cars, home appliances, manufacturing equipment -- were more troublesome, ore time consuming, less safe, and far less convenient. Now, suppose we put ourselves in the place someone 20 years in the future, a future of autonomous systems. A future where transportation is largely autonomous, more efficient, and far safer; a future where dangerous occupations like mining or disaster response are performed by autonomous systems supervised remotely by humans; a future where manufacturing and healthcare are twice as productive per person-hour by having smart monitoring and readily re-tasked autonomous physical agents; a future where the elderly and infirm have 24 hour in-home autonomous support for the basic activities, both physical and social, of daily life. In a future world where these capabilities are commonplace, why would someone come back to today's world where someone has to put their life at risk to do a menial job, we lose time to mindless activities that have no intrinsic value, or be consumed with worry that a loved one is at risk in their own home? In what follows, and in a series of associated essays, we expand on these ideas, and frame both the opportunities and challenges posed by autonomous physical systems.

[1]  Javier Civera,et al.  C2TAM: A Cloud framework for cooperative tracking and mapping , 2014, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[2]  Kenneth Y. Goldberg,et al.  Cloud-based robot grasping with the google object recognition engine , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  Dmitry Berenson,et al.  A robot path planning framework that learns from experience , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  Cong Wang,et al.  Security Challenges for the Public Cloud , 2012, IEEE Internet Computing.

[5]  Dmitry Berenson,et al.  Toward cloud-based grasping with uncertainty in shape: Estimating lower bounds on achieving force closure with zero-slip push grasps , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  Sergey Levine,et al.  End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policies , 2015, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[7]  Moritz Tenorth,et al.  RoboEarth Web-Enabled and Knowledge-Based Active Perception , 2013 .

[8]  Shane Legg,et al.  Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning , 2015, Nature.

[9]  Mohamed S. Kamel,et al.  An experimental approach to robotic grasping using a connectionist architecture and generic grasping functions , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[10]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[11]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Ieee Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1 80 Million Tiny Images: a Large Dataset for Non-parametric Object and Scene Recognition , 2022 .

[12]  Andrew A. Proia,et al.  Consumer Cloud Robotics and the Fair Information Practice Principles: Recognizing the Challenges and Opportunities Ahead , 2015 .

[13]  Moritz Tenorth,et al.  Representation and Exchange of Knowledge About Actions, Objects, and Environments in the RoboEarth Framework , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[14]  Mayank Singh,et al.  Cloud-Based Collaborative 3D Mapping in Real-Time With Low-Cost Robots , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[15]  Pieter Abbeel,et al.  LQG-MP: Optimized path planning for robots with motion uncertainty and imperfect state information , 2010, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[16]  Moritz Tenorth,et al.  KnowRob: A knowledge processing infrastructure for cognition-enabled robots , 2013, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[17]  Tim Kraska,et al.  A sample-and-clean framework for fast and accurate query processing on dirty data , 2014, SIGMOD Conference.

[18]  David Nistér,et al.  Scalable Recognition with a Vocabulary Tree , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[19]  Stefan Parkvall,et al.  LTE: the evolution of mobile broadband , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[20]  Steven M. Seitz,et al.  Photo tourism: exploring photo collections in 3D , 2006, ACM Trans. Graph..

[21]  Patrick Lin,et al.  Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics , 2011 .

[22]  Li Fei-Fei,et al.  ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database , 2009, CVPR.

[23]  Nikolaos Papanikolopoulos,et al.  Point cloud culling for robot vision tasks under communication constraints , 2014, 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[24]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[25]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  The Pascal Visual Object Classes (VOC) Challenge , 2010, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[26]  Sébastien Gérard,et al.  Towards a core ontology for robotics and automation , 2013, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[27]  Liam O'Brien,et al.  On the Conceptualization of Performance Evaluation of IaaS Services , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Services Computing.

[28]  Rolf H. Weber,et al.  Internet of Things - New security and privacy challenges , 2010, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[29]  Kostas E. Bekris,et al.  Sparse Roadmap Spanners , 2012, WAFR.

[30]  Kostas E. Bekris,et al.  Cloud Automation: Precomputing Roadmaps for Flexible Manipulation , 2015, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[31]  Kaijen Hsiao,et al.  A Side of Data With My Robot , 2011, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[32]  Lino Marques,et al.  Computation Sharing in Distributed Robotic Systems: A Case Study on SLAM , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[33]  Fernando Díaz del Río,et al.  A Tradeoff Analysis of a Cloud-Based Robot Navigation Assistant Using Stereo Image Processing , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[34]  Gabriel L. Oliveira,et al.  View Planning For Cloud-Based Active Object Recognition , 2013 .

[35]  Pieter Abbeel,et al.  Image Object Label 3 D CAD Model Candidate Grasps Google Object Recognition Engine Google Cloud Storage Select Feasible Grasp with Highest Success Probability Pose EstimationCamera Robots Cloud 3 D Sensor , 2014 .