BEYOND STUDENT PERCEPTIONS: ISSUES OF INTERACTION, PRESENCE, AND PERFORMANCE IN AN ONLINE COURSE

The research literature on Web-based learning supports the assumption that interaction is important for a successful course, yet questions exist regarding the nature and extent of the interaction and its effects on student performance. Much of the research is based on student perceptions of the quality and quantity of their interactions and how much they have learned in an online course. The purpose of this study is to examine performance in an online course in relationship to student interaction and sense of presence in the course. Data on multiple independent (measures of interaction and presence) and dependent (measures of performance) variables were collected and subjected to analysis. An attempt was made to go beyond typical institutional performance measures such as grades and withdrawal rates and to examine measures specifically related to course objectives.

[1]  Lorraine Sherry,et al.  Issues in Distance Learning , 1995 .

[2]  David Taylor,et al.  Student Participation and Interaction On-Line: A Case Study of Two College Classes—Freshman Writing and a Plant Science Lab , 1996 .

[3]  William Buxton,et al.  Telepresence: Integrating Shared Task and Person Spaces , 1992 .

[4]  Karen Swan,et al.  Measures of Learning Effectiveness in the SUNY Learning Network , 2001 .

[5]  C. Fulford,et al.  Perceptions of Interaction: The critical predictor in distance education , 1993 .

[6]  Robert Fox Information economy , 2018, Digit. Libr. Perspect..

[7]  Anthony G. Picciano Developing an Asynchronous Course Model at a Large, Urban University , 2019, Online Learning.

[8]  Matthew Lombard,et al.  At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence , 2006 .

[9]  Denis Hayes Schools and Classrooms , 2014 .

[10]  Ronald A. Phipps,et al.  What''s the Difference? A Review of Contemporary Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Learning , 1999 .

[11]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Diversity in the use of electronic mail: a preliminary inquiry , 1988, TOIS.

[12]  Anthony G. Picciano Distance Learning: Making Connections Across Virtual Space and Time , 2000 .

[13]  Charles Schlosser,et al.  Distance Education: Review of the Literature , 1994 .

[14]  Michael Stubbs,et al.  Language, Schools and Classrooms , 1976 .

[15]  Maureen S. Battistella,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[16]  C. Tu How Chinese Perceive Social Presence: An Examination of Interaction in Online Learning Environment , 2001 .

[17]  D. Garrison,et al.  Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , 1999 .

[18]  A. Mehrabian Some referents and measures of nonverbal behavior , 1968 .

[19]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[20]  A. Chickering,et al.  Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education , 1987, CORE.

[21]  D. Siva Kumari,et al.  CONNECTING GRADUATE STUDENTS TO VIRTUAL GUESTS THROUGH ASYNCHRONOUS DISCUSSIONS - ANALYSIS OF AN EXPERIENCE , 2019, Online Learning.

[22]  Marc Uri Porat,et al.  The information economy , 1976 .

[23]  Margaret Gorts Morabito Foundations of Distance Education. , 1997 .

[24]  Michael Simonson,et al.  Distance Education: Review of the Literature, 2nd Edition , 1997 .