Modelling the spread of innovation in wild birds

We apply three plausible algorithms in agent-based computer simulations to recent experiments on social learning in wild birds. Although some of the phenomena are simulated by all three learning algorithms, several manifestations of social conformity bias are simulated by only the approximate majority (AM) algorithm, which has roots in chemistry, molecular biology and theoretical computer science. The simulations generate testable predictions and provide several explanatory insights into the diffusion of innovation through a population. The AM algorithm's success raises the possibility of its usefulness in studying group dynamics more generally, in several different scientific domains. Our differential-equation model matches simulation results and provides mathematical insights into the dynamics of these algorithms.

[1]  Kevin N Laland,et al.  Detecting social transmission in networks. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  The role of social and ecological processes in structuring animal populations: a case study from automated tracking of wild birds , 2015, Royal Society Open Science.

[3]  L. Aplin,et al.  Milk bottles revisited: social learning and individual variation in the blue tit, Cyanistes caeruleus , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  C. Boesch,et al.  Primate archaeology reveals cultural transmission in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  A. Whiten,et al.  Cultural diffusion in humans and other animals. , 2016, Current opinion in psychology.

[6]  Kevin N. Laland,et al.  Conformist learning in nine-spined sticklebacks' foraging decisions , 2010, Biology Letters.

[7]  A. Bandura,et al.  Social learning and personality development , 1964 .

[8]  Kevin N Laland,et al.  The animal cultures debate. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[9]  R. L. Day,et al.  Neophilia, innovation and social learning: a study of intergeneric differences in callitrichid monkeys , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  R. Hinde,et al.  The Opening of Milk Bottles by Birds , 1952, Nature.

[11]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[12]  R. Warner,et al.  Traditionality of mating-site preferences in a coral reef fish , 1988, Nature.

[13]  Mark Lubell,et al.  Beyond existence and aiming outside the laboratory: estimating frequency-dependent and pay-off-biased social learning strategies , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  Dorothy M. Fragaszy,et al.  On the relation between social dynamics and social learning , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  C. Lumsden Culture and the Evolutionary Process, Robert Boyd, Peter J. Richerson. University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London (1985), viii, +301. Price $29.95 , 1986 .

[16]  D. Sherry,et al.  Cultural transmission without imitation: Milk bottle opening by birds , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  K. Laland Social learning strategies , 2004, Learning & behavior.

[18]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. , 1986 .

[19]  G. R. Luckhurst,et al.  Director alignment by crossed electric and magnetic fields: a deuterium NMR study. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  Magnus Enquist,et al.  CRITICAL POINTS IN CURRENT THEORY OF CONFORMIST SOCIAL LEARNING , 2007 .

[21]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  Social influence: compliance and conformity. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[22]  Kevin N Laland,et al.  Culture evolves , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  D. Haun,et al.  Conformity and its look-a-likes , 2015, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  T. Lillicrap,et al.  Why Copy Others? Insights from the Social Learning Strategies Tournament , 2010, Science.

[25]  A. Whiten,et al.  Conformity to cultural norms of tool use in chimpanzees , 2005, Nature.

[26]  K. N. Laland,et al.  The Biological Bases of Conformity , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[27]  Luca Cardelli,et al.  The Cell Cycle Switch Computes Approximate Majority , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[28]  R. Boyd,et al.  The evolution of conformist transmission and the emergence of between-group differences. , 1998 .

[29]  Mark Pingle,et al.  Imitation versus rationality: An experimental perspective on decision making , 1995 .

[30]  A. Thornton,et al.  Experimentally induced innovations lead to persistent culture via conformity in wild birds , 2014, Nature.

[31]  Robert S. Baron,et al.  The forgotten variable in conformity research: Impact of task importance on social influence. , 1996 .

[32]  Alex Mesoudi,et al.  Establishing an experimental science of culture: animal social diffusion experiments , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  L. Lefebvre The opening of milk bottles by birds: Evidence for accelerating learning rates, but against the wave-of-advance model of cultural transmission , 1995, Behavioural Processes.

[34]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Report Majority-biased Transmission in Chimpanzees and Human Children, but Not Orangutans , 2022 .

[35]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Social Learning Strategies in Networked Groups , 2013, Cogn. Sci..

[36]  Kevin N Laland,et al.  The effect of task structure on diffusion dynamics: Implications for diffusion curve and network-based analyses , 2010, Learning & behavior.

[37]  David Eisenstat,et al.  A simple population protocol for fast robust approximate majority , 2007, Distributed Computing.

[38]  Hang Zhang,et al.  Ubiquitous Log Odds: A Common Representation of Probability and Frequency Distortion in Perception, Action, and Cognition , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[39]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Multialternative decision field theory: a dynamic connectionist model of decision making. , 2001, Psychological review.

[40]  K. Laland,et al.  Social Learning in Animals: Empirical Studies and Theoretical Models , 2005 .

[41]  K. Laland,et al.  The evolutionary basis of human social learning , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  Mark S. Granovetter Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[43]  P. Richerson,et al.  • AN EVOLUTIONARY MODEL OF SOCIAL LEARNING: THE EFFECTS OF SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIATON , 2013 .

[44]  Marcel Montrey,et al.  Specialized hybrid learners resolve Rogers' paradox about the adaptive value of social learning. , 2017, Journal of theoretical biology.

[45]  Luc-Alain Giraldeau,et al.  The evolution of social learning rules: payoff-biased and frequency-dependent biased transmission. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[46]  H. Roche,et al.  Why Copy Others? Insights from the Social Learning Strategies Tournament , 2010 .

[47]  Timothy M. Waring,et al.  Article in Press Evolution and Human Behavior Xxx (2005) Xxx – Xxx , 2022 .

[48]  Alan R. Rogers,et al.  Does Biology Constrain Culture , 1988 .

[49]  B. Galef,et al.  ‘Conformity’ in Norway rats? , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[50]  E. van de Waal,et al.  Potent Social Learning and Conformity Shape a Wild Primate’s Foraging Decisions , 2013, Science.

[51]  Boleslaw K. Szymanski,et al.  Social consensus through the influence of committed minorities , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[52]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Innovation, imitation, and problem-solving in a networked group. , 2011, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.