High dimensional model representation of log likelihood ratio: binary classification with SNP data

Background Developing binary classification rules based on SNP observations has been a major challenge for many modern bioinformatics applications, e.g., predicting risk of future disease events in complex conditions such as cancer. Small-sample, high-dimensional nature of SNP data, weak effect of each SNP on the outcome, and highly non-linear SNP interactions are several key factors complicating the analysis. Additionally, SNPs take a finite number of values which may be best understood as ordinal or categorical variables, but are treated as continuous ones by many algorithms. Methods We use the theory of high dimensional model representation (HDMR) to build appropriate low dimensional glass-box models, allowing us to account for the effects of feature interactions. We compute the second order HDMR expansion of the log-likelihood ratio to account for the effects of single SNPs and their pairwise interactions. We propose a regression based approach, called linear approximation for block second order HDMR expansion of categorical observations (LABS-HDMR-CO), to approximate the HDMR coefficients. We show how HDMR can be used to detect pairwise SNP interactions, and propose the fixed pattern test (FPT) to identify statistically significant pairwise interactions. Results We apply LABS-HDMR-CO and FPT to synthetically generated HAPGEN2 data as well as to two GWAS cancer datasets. In these examples LABS-HDMR-CO enjoys superior accuracy compared with several algorithms used for SNP classification, while also taking pairwise interactions into account. FPT declares very few significant interactions in the small sample GWAS datasets when bounding false discovery rate (FDR) by 5%, due to the large number of tests performed. On the other hand, LABS-HDMR-CO utilizes a large number of SNP pairs to improve its prediction accuracy. In the larger HAPGEN2 dataset FTP declares a larger portion of SNP pairs used by LABS-HDMR-CO as significant. Conclusion LABS-HDMR-CO and FPT are interesting methods to design prediction rules and detect pairwise feature interactions for SNP data. Reliably detecting pairwise SNP interactions and taking advantage of potential interactions to improve prediction accuracy are two different objectives addressed by these methods. While the large number of potential SNP interactions may result in low power of detection, potentially interacting SNP pairs, of which many might be false alarms, can still be used to improve prediction accuracy.

[1]  Chuhsing Kate Hsiao,et al.  Integrated Analyses of Copy Number Variations and Gene Expression in Lung Adenocarcinoma , 2011, PloS one.

[2]  E. Diamandis,et al.  Cancer biomarkers: can we turn recent failures into success? , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[3]  Victor Trevino,et al.  A New Gene Expression Signature for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer using Frozen Fresh Tissue before Neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2017, Molecular medicine.

[4]  Ilya M. Sobol,et al.  Theorems and examples on high dimensional model representation , 2003, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  Peter Donnelly,et al.  HAPGEN2: simulation of multiple disease SNPs , 2011, Bioinform..

[6]  Yan Guo,et al.  Large-scale genetic study in East Asians identifies six new loci associated with colorectal cancer risk , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[7]  David O Wilson,et al.  Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Using Common SNPs Located in GWAS-Identified Susceptibility Regions , 2015, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[8]  M. Samuels Saturation of the Human Phenome , 2010, Current genomics.

[9]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[10]  Alexandre Alonso Alves,et al.  Advancing palm genomics by developing a high-density battery of molecular markers for Elaeis oleifera for future downstream applications , 2014, BMC Proceedings.

[11]  Jiawei Shen,et al.  Genome‐wide two‐locus interaction analysis identifies multiple epistatic SNP pairs that confer risk of prostate cancer: A cross‐population study , 2017, International journal of cancer.

[12]  Herschel Rabitz,et al.  Efficient Implementation of High Dimensional Model Representations , 2001 .

[13]  Carlos R Plata-Salamán,et al.  Biomarker discovery and validation: technologies and integrative approaches. , 2004, Trends in biotechnology.

[14]  Yaniv Plan,et al.  Robust 1-bit Compressed Sensing and Sparse Logistic Regression: A Convex Programming Approach , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[15]  Hilde van der Togt,et al.  Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[16]  Yaniv Plan,et al.  One-bit compressed sensing with non-Gaussian measurements , 2012, ArXiv.

[17]  Alex E. Lash,et al.  Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[18]  Ricardo Cao,et al.  Evaluating the Ability of Tree‐Based Methods and Logistic Regression for the Detection of SNP‐SNP Interaction , 2009, Annals of human genetics.

[19]  T. Katagiri,et al.  Frequent downregulation of LRRC26 by epigenetic alterations is involved in the malignant progression of triple-negative breast cancer. , 2018, International journal of oncology.

[20]  Egon S. Pearson,et al.  On the problem of two samples , 1930 .

[21]  Pedro Larrañaga,et al.  A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics , 2007, Bioinform..

[22]  Hsin-Hsiung Huang,et al.  Comparing logistic regression, support vector machines, and permanental classification methods in predicting hypertension , 2014, BMC Proceedings.

[23]  K. Weigel,et al.  Machine learning classification procedure for selecting SNPs in genomic selection: application to early mortality in broilers. , 2007, Developments in biologicals.

[24]  Yaniv Plan,et al.  One‐Bit Compressed Sensing by Linear Programming , 2011, ArXiv.

[25]  H. Rabitz,et al.  General foundations of high‐dimensional model representations , 1999 .

[26]  Herschel Rabitz,et al.  General formulation of HDMR component functions with independent and correlated variables , 2011, Journal of Mathematical Chemistry.

[27]  G. Hooker Generalized Functional ANOVA Diagnostics for High-Dimensional Functions of Dependent Variables , 2007 .

[28]  P. Visca,et al.  Determination of SGK1 mRNA in non-small cell lung cancer samples underlines high expression in squamous cell carcinomas , 2012, Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR.

[29]  Mitsutaka Kadota,et al.  Identification of novel gene amplifications in breast cancer and coexistence of gene amplification with an activating mutation of PIK3CA. , 2009, Cancer research.

[30]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  What should be expected from feature selection in small-sample settings , 2006, Bioinform..

[31]  H. Rabitz,et al.  Random sampling-high dimensional model representation (RS-HDMR) and orthogonality of its different order component functions. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[32]  Lori A. Dalton,et al.  Optimal Bayesian feature filtering for single-nucleotide polymorphism data , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM).

[33]  Xinzhong Xu,et al.  The Exact Likelihood Ratio Test for Equality of Two Normal Populations , 2012 .

[34]  Joo-Ho Chung,et al.  A genetic association analysis of polymorphisms, rs2282695 and rs12373539, in the FOSB gene and papillary thyroid cancer , 2012, Experimental and therapeutic medicine.

[35]  Role of SGK1 for fatty acid uptake, cell survival and radioresistance of NCI-H460 lung cancer cells exposed to acute or chronic cycling severe hypoxia , 2016, Radiation oncology.

[36]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Performance of feature-selection methods in the classification of high-dimension data , 2009, Pattern Recognit..

[37]  G. Rempała,et al.  Estimation of Sobol's sensitivity indices under generalized linear models , 2018, Communications in statistics: theory and methods.

[38]  Holger Schwender,et al.  Identification of SNP interactions using logic regression. , 2008, Biostatistics.

[39]  Kent A Weigel,et al.  Comparison of classification methods for detecting associations between SNPs and chick mortality , 2009, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[40]  F. Eckhardt,et al.  Correlative gene expression and DNA methylation profiling in lung development nominate new biomarkers in lung cancer. , 2008, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[41]  Balázs Győrffy,et al.  Expression of CDK8 and CDK8-interacting Genes as Potential Biomarkers in Breast Cancer. , 2015, Current cancer drug targets.