Prototype‐based assessment of laypeople's views of love

Empirical work on love has focused mainly on romantic/passionate love. Recent research suggests that other kinds of love, such as friendship love and familial love, may be more salient to laypeople (Fehr & Russell, 1991). One purpose of this research was to offer a more complete picture of how laypeople conceptualize love by exploring a broad range of types of love. The other major purpose was to develop a methodology for studying laypeople's conceptions of different kinds of love. Four studies were conducted. In Study 1, dating couples were presented with prototypes of 15 different types of love. They were asked to rate how similar the conception of love depicted in each prototype was to their own view of love. Study 2 was a replication of Study 1 with subjects who were not dating one another. In Study 3, the validity of the prototype measures was explored by asking subjects to determine the kind of love depicted in each prototype. Study 4 investigated the relation between the prototypes of love and existing love scales and therefore addressed issues of convergent and discriminant validity. These prototype-based measures showed considerable promise as valid, reliable instruments for assessing people's views of love. They revealed that laypeople regard friendship love and familial kinds of love as closest to their own view. Passionate kinds of love (e.g., passionate, infatuation, puppy love) received the lowest ratings. The measures also proved useful in elucidating the relation between laypeople's and experts' conceptions of romantic and passionate love.

[1]  R. Broughton.  The prototype concept in personality assessment. , 1990 .

[2]  E. Hatfield,et al.  Measuring passionate love in intimate relationships. , 1986, Journal of adolescence.

[3]  James A. Russell,et al.  The Concept of Love Viewed From a Prototype Perspective , 1991 .

[4]  Z. Rubin.  Measurement of romantic love. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  S. Metts,et al.  Development of the `Romantic Beliefs Scale' and Examination of the Effects of Gender and Gender-Role Orientation , 1989 .

[6]  Garth J. O. Fletcher,et al.  Love, Hate, Anger, and Jealousy in Close Relationships: A Prototype and Cognitive Appraisal Analysis , 1993 .

[7]  E. Hatfield.  Passionate Love, Companionate Love, and Intimacy , 1982 .

[8]  J. Simpson.  Influence of Attachment Styles on Romantic Relationships , 1990 .

[9]  Susan S. Hendrick,et al.  A theory and method of love. , 1986 .

[10]  G. Adams,et al.  Love American Style: A Test of Role Structure Theory on Changes in Attitudes Toward Love , 1978 .

[11]  J. Russell,et al.  Concept of Emotion Viewed From a Prototype Perspective , 1984 .

[12]  C. Hazan,et al.  Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  THE USE AND ABUSE OF FACTOR ANALYSIS IN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH , 1979 .

[14]  R S Longman,et al.  A Regression Equation for the Parallel Analysis Criterion in Principal Components Analysis: Mean and 95th Percentile Eigenvalues. , 1989, Multivariate behavioral research.

[15]  Neil Charness,et al.  Acquiring skill at mental calculation in adulthood: a task decomposition , 1988 .

[16]  R. Broughton.  A prototype strategy for construction of personality scales. , 1984 .

[17]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  C. Hobart.  The Incidence of Romanticism During Courtship , 1958 .

[19]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  Psychometric and Geometric Characteristics of the Revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS-R). , 1988, Multivariate behavioral research.

[20]  S. Read,et al.  Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  K. Davis,et al.  Lovestyles and Attachment Styles Compared: Their Relations to Each Other and to Various Relationship Characteristics , 1988 .

[22]  M. Lund.  The Development of Investment and Commitment Scales for Predicting Continuity of Personal Relationships , 1985 .

[23]  Kenneth H. Craik,et al.  The Act Frequency Approach to Personality , 1983 .

[24]  K. Davis,et al.  Love Styles and Relationship Quality: A Contribution to Validation , 1987 .

[25]  K. Bartholomew.  Avoidance of Intimacy: An Attachment Perspective , 1990 .

[26]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  The nature of love. , 1984 .

[27]  K. Dion,et al.  Correlates of romantic love. , 1973, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[28]  Susan S. Hendrick,et al.  Research on love: Does it measure up? , 1989 .

[29]  D. Buss,et al.  The frequency concept of disposition: dominance and prototypically dominant acts^ , 1980 .

[30]  E. J. Kanin,et al.  A research note on male‐female differentials in the experience of heterosexual love , 1970 .

[31]  D. Knox,et al.  Attitudes of college students toward love. , 1968 .

[32]  Beverley Fehr,et al.  Prototype analysis of the concepts of love and commitment , 1988 .