An Experimental and Numerical Study of Two-phase Flow in Horizontal Eccentric Annuli

The aerated fluids have a potential to increase rate of penetration, minimize formation damage, minimize lost circulation, reduce drill pipe sticking, and, therefore, assist in improving the productivity. The technology of drilling using aerated fluids in the area of offshore drilling is very common. The use of compressible drilling fluids in offshore technology has found applications in old depleted reservoirs and in the new fields with special drilling problems. However, the drilling performed with gas-liquid mixture, calculating the pressure losses and the performance of cutting transportation is more difficult than single-phase fluid due to the characteristics of multi-phase fluid flow. In case configured drilling is directional or horizontal, these types of calculations are becoming more difficult depending on the slope of the wells. Both hydraulic behavior and mechanism of cutting transportation of the drilling fluids formed by gas-liquid mixture are not fully understood yet, especially there is a large uncertainty in selection of most appropriate flow regarding two phases. In this study, gas-liquid flow inside horizontal eccentric annulus is simulated using an Eulerian-Eulerian computational fluid dynamics model for two-phase flow patterns in an annulus, i.e., dispersed bubble, dispersed annular, plug, slug, wavy annular. A flow loop was constructed in order to conduct experiments using air-water mixtures for various in-situ air and water flow velocities. A digital high speed camera is used for recording each test dynamically for identification of the liquid holdup and flow patterns.

[1]  Ramadan Ahmed,et al.  Experimental Study and Modeling of Cuttings Transport with Aerated Mud in Horizontal Wellbore at Simulated Downhole Conditions , 2004 .

[2]  A. Dukler,et al.  A model for predicting flow regime transitions in horizontal and near horizontal gas‐liquid flow , 1976 .

[3]  Mehmet Evren Ozbayoglu,et al.  Flow Pattern Identification Of Gas-Liquid Flow Through Horizontal Annular Geometries , 2010 .

[4]  James P. Brill,et al.  A Comprehensive Mechanistic Model for Two-Phase Flow in Pipelines , 1990 .

[5]  Rajan N. Chokshi,et al.  Experimental Study and the Development of a Mechanistic Model for Two-Phase Flow Through Vertical Tubing , 1996 .

[6]  Stefan Z. Miska,et al.  New Developments in Aerated Mud Hydraulics for Horizontal Well Drilling , 2000 .

[7]  M. Sadatomi,et al.  Two-phase flow in vertical noncircular channels , 1982 .

[8]  Mamoru Ishii,et al.  Cap bubbly-to-slug flow regime transition in a vertical annulus , 2004 .

[9]  D. C. Groeneveld,et al.  Effect of flow obstructions on the flow pattern transitions in horizontal two-phase flow , 1983 .

[10]  Khalid Aziz,et al.  A Mechanistic Model for Multiphase Flow in Pipes , 2000 .

[11]  James P. Brill,et al.  A Study of Two-Phase Flow in Inclined Pipes , 1973 .

[12]  Ovadia Shoham,et al.  Unified Mechanistic Model for Steady-State Two-Phase Flow: Horizontal to Vertical Upward Flow , 2000 .

[13]  Rolv Rommetveit,et al.  An Experimental and Theoretical Study of Two-Phase Flow in Horizontal or Slightly Deviated Fully Eccentric Annuli , 2000 .

[14]  C. S. Kabir,et al.  TWO-PHASE FLOW IN VERTICAL AND INCLINED ANNULI , 1992 .

[15]  Mehmet Evren Ozbayoglu,et al.  A Mechanistic Model to characterize the Two Phase Drilling Fluid Flow through inclined Eccentric Annular Geometry , 2012 .

[16]  Cem Sarica,et al.  A Mechanistic Model for Gas/Liquid Flow in Upward Vertical Annuli , 2010 .

[17]  Ovadia Shoham,et al.  Upward Vertical Two-Phase Flow Through an Annulus—Part I: Single-Phase Friction Factor, Taylor Bubble Rise Velocity, and Flow Pattern Prediction , 1992 .