Long term cardiovascular risk models’ combination - a new approach

This work addresses two major drawbacks of the current cardiovascular risk score systems: reduced number of risk factors considered by each individual tool and the inability of these tools to deal with incomplete information. To achieve this goal a two phase strategy was followed. In the first phase, a common representation procedure was considered, based on a Naïve-Bayes classifier methodology. Conditional probabilities parameters were initially evaluated through a frequency estimation method and after that optimized using a Genetic Algorithm approach. In a second phase, a combination scheme was proposed exploiting the particular features of Bayes probabilistic reasoning. This strategy was applied to describe and combine SCORE, ASSIGN and Framingham models. Validation results were obtained based on individual models, assuming their statistical correctness. The achieved results are very promising, showing the potential of the strategy to accomplish the desired goals.

[1]  Peter Herbison,et al.  Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) hospital discharge risk score accurately predicts long-term mortality post acute coronary syndrome. , 2007, American heart journal.

[2]  J. Hippisley-Cox,et al.  Derivation and validation of QRISK, a new cardiovascular disease risk score for the United Kingdom: prospective open cohort study , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  H. Tunstall-Pedoe,et al.  Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. , 2003, European heart journal.

[4]  M. Woodward,et al.  Adding social deprivation and family history to cardiovascular risk assessment: the ASSIGN score from the Scottish Heart Health Extended Cohort (SHHEC) , 2005, Heart.

[5]  Shah Ebrahim,et al.  European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary: Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (Constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invit , 2007, European heart journal.

[6]  R. Jackson,et al.  Updated New Zealand cardiovascular disease risk-benefit prediction guide , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  I. U. Haq,et al.  Coronary and cardiovascular risk estimation for primary prevention:validation of a new Sheffield table in the 1995 Scottish health survey population , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  Petros Nihoyannopoulos,et al.  Joint British recommendations on prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice , 1998, Heart.

[9]  Ying Yang,et al.  A comparative study of discretization methods for naive-Bayes classifiers , 2002 .

[10]  Silvana Quaglini,et al.  Cardiovascular risk calculators: understanding differences and realising economic implications , 2005, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[11]  M. Pencina,et al.  General Cardiovascular Risk Profile for Use in Primary Care: The Framingham Heart Study , 2008, Circulation.

[12]  R. Holman,et al.  The UKPDS risk engine: a model for the risk of coronary heart disease in Type II diabetes (UKPDS 56). , 2001, Clinical science.

[13]  Carol Coupland,et al.  Derivation, validation, and evaluation of a new QRISK model to estimate lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease: cohort study using QResearch database , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Bayesian Network Classifiers , 1997, Machine Learning.

[15]  Kevin B. Korb,et al.  Data mining cardiovascular Bayesian networks , 2005 .

[16]  David Maxwell Chickering,et al.  Learning Bayesian Networks: The Combination of Knowledge and Statistical Data , 1994, Machine Learning.

[17]  Alexey Tsymbal,et al.  Ensemble feature selection with the simple Bayesian classification , 2003, Inf. Fusion.

[18]  Kevin B. Korb,et al.  Knowledge Engineering Cardiovascular Bayesian Networks from the Literature , 2005 .

[19]  GerdAssmann,et al.  Simple Scoring Scheme for Calculating the Risk of Acute Coronary Events Based on the 10-Year Follow-Up of the Prospective Cardiovascular Münster (PROCAM) Study , 2002 .

[20]  G. Specchia,et al.  Management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. , 2002, European heart journal.

[21]  Harry Zhang,et al.  Full Bayesian network classifiers , 2006, ICML.

[22]  R. Jackson Guidelines on preventing cardiovascular disease in clinical practice , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[23]  R. Holman,et al.  Erratum: The UKPDS risk engine: A model for the risk of coronary heart disease in type II diabetes (UKPDS 56) (Clinical Science (2001) 101 (671-679)) , 2002 .