Evaluation of a novel autoinjector for subcutaneous self-administration of belimumab in systemic lupus erythematosus

Objective: To study self-administration and pharmacokinetics (PK) of subcutaneous (SC) belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: Patients previously treated with belimumab self-administered belimumab 200 mg SC weekly for 8 weeks using an autoinjector. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients able to self-administer their first and second dose (weeks 1 and 2) in the clinic. The proportion able to self-administer at weeks 4 and 8 (clinic) and weeks 3, 5, 6, and 7 (home) were secondary endpoints. Belimumab PK, safety, and injection-site pain were assessed. Results: 91/95 patients completed the study (withdrawals: adverse events (AEs): 3; lost to follow-up: 1). 93% were female, and mean (SD) age was 44.8 (12.50) years. The majority (99%, 89/90; no attempt, n = 5) successfully self-administered belimumab SC at weeks 1 and 2 (5 had clinic staff assistance), and 98% (85/87) successfully self-administered at weeks 4 and 8. Home-administration success rates were high (93%, (81/87) at weeks 3, 5, 6, and 7). Week 8 median trough concentration was 113 µg/mL. For patients with a ≤ 1.5-week interval between IV SC administration, week-1 concentrations were higher vs. week 8 (+ 51% median) but within a range observed with IV dosing; those with a ≥ 2.5-week interval had median differences close to 0. AEs and serious AEs were low, with no deaths; pain levels were low and decreased with subsequent injections. Conclusion: Patients with SLE successfully self-administered belimumab SC using a novel autoinjector; the PK profile was stable following a switch from IV with acceptable AE and pain levels. The recommended dosing interval between IV to SC dosing is 1 – 4 weeks.

[1]  M. Petri,et al.  Efficacy and safety of belimumab in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[2]  H. Kitchen,et al.  Patient-reported outcome measures for systemic lupus erythematosus clinical trials: a review of content validity, face validity and psychometric performance , 2014, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.

[3]  Marianne Morris,et al.  The impact of patient-perceived restricted access to anti-TNF therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: a qualitative study. , 2009, Musculoskeletal care.

[4]  H. Struemper,et al.  Comparison of intravenous and subcutaneous exposure supporting dose selection of subcutaneous belimumab systemic lupus erythematosus Phase 3 program , 2016, Lupus.

[5]  S. Pettersson,et al.  An exploration of patient-reported symptoms in systemic lupus erythematosus and the relationship to health-related quality of life , 2012, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[6]  M. Fiscella,et al.  Bioavailability, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of Belimumab Administered Subcutaneously in Healthy Subjects , 2013, Clinical pharmacology in drug development.

[7]  M. Petri,et al.  A phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled study of belimumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits B lymphocyte stimulator, in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. , 2011, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[8]  Meng Chen,et al.  The optimal choice of medication administration route regarding intravenous, intramuscular, and subcutaneous injection , 2015, Patient preference and adherence.

[9]  D. Collier,et al.  Cost and effectiveness of biologics for rheumatoid arthritis in a commercially insured population. , 2015, Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy.

[10]  V. Roschke,et al.  Generation and characterization of LymphoStat-B, a human monoclonal antibody that antagonizes the bioactivities of B lymphocyte stimulator. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[11]  C. Lau,et al.  The socioeconomic burden of SLE , 2009, Nature Reviews Rheumatology.

[12]  Frances Chilton,et al.  Treatment choices, preferences and decision-making by patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 2008, Musculoskeletal care.

[13]  M. Schiff,et al.  New autoinjector technology for the delivery of subcutaneous methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis , 2014, Expert review of medical devices.

[14]  M. Herold,et al.  Factors influencing the patient evaluation of injection experience with the SmartJect autoinjector in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2015, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[15]  J. Curtis,et al.  Injection-site burning and stinging in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using injectable biologics , 2011, Current medical research and opinion.

[16]  M. Barton,et al.  Relative Bioavailability of a Single Dose of Belimumab Administered Subcutaneously by Prefilled Syringe or Autoinjector in Healthy Subjects , 2015, Clinical pharmacology in drug development.

[17]  M. Genovese,et al.  Long-Term Safety of Subcutaneous Abatacept in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Integrated Analysis of Clinical Trial Data Representing More Than Four Years of Treatment , 2014, Arthritis & rheumatology.

[18]  S. Cohen,et al.  Clinical assessment of pain, tolerability, and preference of an autoinjection pen versus a prefilled syringe for patient self-administration of the fully human, monoclonal antibody adalimumab: the TOUCH trial. , 2006, Clinical therapeutics.

[19]  P. Laurent,et al.  Results of a human factors experiment of the usability and patient acceptance of a new autoinjector in patients with rheumatoid arthritis , 2014, Patient preference and adherence.

[20]  D. D'cruz,et al.  The prevalence and associations of fatigue in systemic lupus erythematosus. , 2000, Rheumatology.