Interosseous ligament tears of the wrist: comparison of multi-detector row CT arthrography and MR imaging.

PURPOSE To compare the accuracy of multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) arthrography and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in depicting tears of dorsal, central, and palmar segments of scapholunate (SL) and lunotriquetral (LT) ligaments in cadavers. MATERIALS AND METHODS Cadaver wrists were obtained and used according to institutional guidelines and with informed consent of donors prior to death. Nine cadaver wrists of eight subjects were evaluated. MR images were obtained with a 1.5-T MR unit. Imaging protocol included intermediate-weighted coronal and transverse fast spin-echo and coronal three-dimensional gradient-echo sequences. Multi-detector row CT arthrography was performed after tricompartmental injection of 3-6 mL of contrast material with a concentration of 160 mg per milliliter of iodine. Palmar, dorsal, and central segments of both ligaments were analyzed on transverse and coronal MR images and multiplanar multi-detector row CT reconstructions by two musculoskeletal radiologists working independently. Open inspection of the wrists was the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated from the imaging and gross pathologic readings. Statistical significance was calculated with the McNemar test. Weighted kappa values for interobserver agreement were calculated for both imaging modalities. RESULTS All ligament segments could be visualized in all cases with both imaging modalities. CT arthrography was more sensitive (100%) than MR imaging (60%) in detection of palmar segment tears (P = .62); specificity of both imaging modalities was 77%. Sensitivity (CT arthrography, 86%; MR imaging, 79%) and specificity (CT arthrography, 50%; MR imaging, 25%) for detection of the central segment tears were determined. Dorsal segment tears were detected only with CT arthrography, while all tears were missed with MR imaging (P = .02). Interobserver agreement was better for multi-detector row CT arthrography (kappa = 0.37-0.78) than for MR imaging (kappa = -0.33 to -0.10). CONCLUSION Performance in depiction of palmar and central segment tears of SL and LT ligaments is almost equal for multi-detector row CT arthrography and MR imaging, with much higher interobserver reliability for CT arthrography. CT arthrography is significantly superior to MR imaging in the detection of dorsal segment tears of SL and LT ligaments.

[1]  Rainer Schmitt,et al.  Direkte MR-Arthrographie des Handgelenks im Vergleich zur Arthroskopie: Eine prospektive Studie an 125 Patienten , 2003 .

[2]  R. Lange,et al.  Internal derangement of the wrist: indirect MR arthrography versus unenhanced MR imaging. , 2003, Radiology.

[3]  D. Weishaupt,et al.  Partial Interosseous Ligament Tears of the Wrist: Difficulty in Utilizing Either Primary or Secondary MRI Signs , 2001, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[4]  R A Berger,et al.  The anatomy of the ligaments of the wrist and distal radioulnar joints. , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  R. Meuli,et al.  Wrist ligament injuries: value of post-arthrography computed tomography , 2001, Skeletal Radiology.

[6]  L. Gilula,et al.  Scapholunate ligamentous communicating defects in symptomatic and asymptomatic wrists: characteristics. , 2000, Radiology.

[7]  M. Reiser,et al.  Magnetresonanztomographie des Handgelenkes : Vergleich hochauflösender Pulssequenzen und unterschiedlicher Fettsignalunterdrückungen an Leichenpräparaten , 2000 .

[8]  R A Berger,et al.  Constraint and material properties of the subregions of the scapholunate interosseous ligament. , 1999, The Journal of hand surgery.

[9]  K. Hahn,et al.  The carpal ligaments in MR arthrography of the wrist: Correlation with standard MRI and wrist arthroscopy , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  M. Zanetti,et al.  Triangular fibrocartilage and intercarpal ligaments of the wrist: Does MR arthrography improve standard MRI? , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  K. Hahn,et al.  The scapholunate interosseous ligament in MR arthrography of the wrist: correlation with non-enhanced MRI and wrist arthroscopy , 1997, Skeletal Radiology.

[12]  S. Totterman,et al.  Scapholunate ligament: normal MR appearance on three-dimensional gradient-recalled-echo images. , 1996, Radiology.

[13]  T. Wright,et al.  Incidence of ligament lesions and associated degenerative changes in the elderly wrist. , 1994, The Journal of hand surgery.

[14]  C. Kénési,et al.  The Distal Ligamentous Complex of the Scaphoid and the Scapho-Lunate Ligament. An Anatomic, Histological and Biomechanical study , 1993, Journal of hand surgery.

[15]  D. Sartoris,et al.  Is MR better than arthrography for evaluating the ligaments of the wrist? In vitro study. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  S. Viegas,et al.  Attritional lesions of the wrist joint. , 1987, The Journal of hand surgery.

[17]  W. Reinus,et al.  Fluoroscopic identification of torn intercarpal ligaments after injection of contrast material. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[19]  M. Schweitzer,et al.  Indirect wrist MR arthrography: the effects of passive motion versus active exercise , 2000, Skeletal Radiology.

[20]  J. Hodler,et al.  Chronic wrist pain: spin-echo and short tau inversion recovery MR imaging and conventional and MR arthrography. , 1992, Radiology.

[21]  M. Zlatkin,et al.  Chronic wrist pain: evaluation with high-resolution MR imaging. , 1989, Radiology.

[22]  I. Kessler,et al.  An experimental study of the radiocarpal joint by arthrography. , 1961, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.