Uncertainty Analysis of Aeroheating Predictions for Titan Entries

A sensitivity and parametric uncertainty analysis of the stagnation point convective heating rate is performed on a Huygens geometry entering the Titan atmosphere. The purpose of the study is to determine which CFD input parameters has the largest effect on the convective heating at fullycatalytic surface. The primary contributors to the heating rate sensitivity and uncertainty were the N2N2, N 2-N, and N 2-H binary collision integrals. Diatomic nitrogen is the dominant species in the shock layer and the diffusion of atomic nitrogen and hydrogen to the vehicle surface is the major rate limiting process to the surface recombination. In terms of input parameter type, the binary collision integrals contributed from 73% to 87% of the overall convective heating rate uncertainty. None of the other input parameter types (dissociation reaction rates, exchange reaction rates, vibrationdissociation coupling parameters, vibrational-translational relaxation times) contributed more than 12.5%.

[1]  G. Candler,et al.  Data-Parallel Line Relaxation Method for the Navier -Stokes Equations , 1998 .

[2]  Richard A. Thompson,et al.  A review of reaction rates and thermodynamic and transport properties for the 11-species air model for chemical and thermal nonequilibrium calculations to 30000 K , 1989 .

[3]  Ethiraj Venkatapathy,et al.  Computational Aerothermodynamic Design Issues for Hypersonic Vehicles , 1997 .

[4]  David W. Bogdanoff,et al.  Modeling and Experimental Validation of CN Radiation Behind a Strong Shock Wave , 2005 .

[5]  John D. Ramshaw,et al.  Self-Consistent Effective Binary Diffusion in Multicomponent Gas Mixtures , 1990 .

[6]  M. Wright,et al.  Recommended Collision Integrals for Transport Property Computations Part 1: Air Species , 2005 .

[7]  Deepak Bose,et al.  Prediction of the Aerothermodynamic Environment of the Huygens Probe , 2005 .

[8]  D. Bershader,et al.  Studies of radiative emission from the simulated shock layer of the Huygens probe , 1992 .

[9]  Aleta Duvall,et al.  Engineering-Level Model Atmospheres for Titan and Neptune , 2003 .

[10]  Deepak Bose,et al.  Impact of Flowfield-Radiation Coupling on Aeroheating for Titan Aerocapture , 2005 .

[11]  Ellis E. Whiting,et al.  Titan atmospheric composition by hypervelocity shock-layer analysis , 1989 .

[12]  Tahir Gokcen,et al.  N2-CH4-Ar Chemical Kinetic Model for Simulations of Atmospheric Entry to Titan , 2004 .

[13]  Michael J. Wright,et al.  A Code Calibration Study for Huygens Entry Aeroheating , 2006 .

[14]  James O. Arnold,et al.  NEQAIR96,Nonequilibrium and Equilibrium Radiative Transport and Spectra Program: User's Manual , 1996 .

[15]  Deepak Bose,et al.  Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of Thermochemical Modeling for Titan Atmospheric Entry , 2004 .

[16]  Dinesh K. Prabhu,et al.  An Analysis of the Radiative Heating Environment for Aerocapture at Titan , 2003 .

[17]  Thierry Magin,et al.  NONEQUILIBRIUM RADIATION MODELING FOR HUYGENS ENTRY , 2006 .