Privacy and Artificial Agents, or, Is Google Reading My Email?

We investigate legal and philosophical notions of privacy in the context of artificial agents. Our analysis utilizes a normative account of privacy that defends its value and the extent to which it should be protected: privacy is treated as an interest with moral value, to supplement the legal claim that privacy is a legal right worthy of protection by society and the law. We argue that the fact that the only entity to access my personal data (such as email) is an artificial agent is irrelevant to whether a breach of privacy has occurred. What is relevant are the capacities of the agent: what the agent is both able and empowered to do with that information. We show how concepts of legal agency and attribution of knowledge gained by agents to their principals are crucial to understanding whether a violation of privacy has occurred when artificial agents access users' personal data. As natural language processing and semantic extraction used in artificial agents become increasingly sophisticated, so the corporations that deploy those agents will be more likely to be attributed with knowledge of their users' personal information, thus triggering significant potential legal liabilities.

[1]  Robert K. Fullinwider Public Affairs Quarterly , 1989 .

[2]  Deirdre K. Mulligan,et al.  Storing Our Lives Online: Expanded Email Storage Raises Complex Policy Issues , 2005 .

[3]  Michael A. Menlowe,et al.  Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology , 2009 .

[4]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace , 1999 .

[5]  Jason Isaac Miller "Don't Be Evil": Gmail's Relevant Text Advertisements Violate Google's Own Motto and Your E-Mail Privacy Rights , 2005 .

[6]  F. Schoeman,et al.  Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy , 1984 .

[7]  Samir Chopra,et al.  Attribution of Knowledge to Artificial Agents and their Principals , 2005, IJCAI.

[8]  Herman T. Tavani,et al.  Genomic Research and Data-Mining Technology: Implications for Personal Privacy and Informed Consent , 2004, Ethics and Information Technology.

[9]  Michael Scanlan Informational privacy and moral values , 2004, Ethics and Information Technology.

[10]  J. Rubenfeld The Right of Privacy , 1989 .

[11]  P. Agre,et al.  Technology and privacy: The new landscape , 1998 .

[12]  Charles Hollander,et al.  Conflicts of Interest and Chinese Walls , 2000 .

[13]  Alistair Kelman,et al.  Database Nation: The Death of Privacy in the 21st Century , 2000, J. Inf. Law Technol..

[14]  Diane P. Michelfelder The moral value of informational privacy in cyberspace , 2001, Ethics and Information Technology.

[15]  Simon Rogerson,et al.  Ethics and Information Technology , 1997, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Samir Chopra,et al.  Artificial Agents - Personhood in Law and Philosophy , 2004, ECAI.

[17]  Mark Cenite Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace , 2000 .

[18]  David Mason,et al.  Technology and ethical dilemmas in a medical setting: Privacy, professional autonomy, life and death , 2001, Ethics and Information Technology.

[19]  M. Shermer,et al.  Don't Be Evil , 2008 .