Knowledge gaps in relation to radionuclide levels and transfer to wild plants and animals, in the context of environmental impact assessements, and a strategy to fill them

International activities with regards the development of methods for assessing impacts on the environment from ionising radiation have been substantial in recent years. In developing these methods, there are requirements (i) to determine the transfer of radionuclides within ecosystems and (ii) to determine background dose-rates arising from the presence of naturally occurring radionuclides, in a satisfactory manner. It has quickly become evident that fulfilling these 2 requirements is not entirely straightforward reflecting a lack of data in many cases. This report specifies exactly where these data-gaps lie through analyses of data generated from the most recent studies conducted internationally on this topic. It is evident that information is limited for numerous radionuclides from U-238 and Th-232 decay series and notably, in view of its importance as a contributor to dose-rates in plants and animals, Po-210. The simple way to rectify these data deficiencies is to organise target field campaigns focusing on particular species and radionuclides where information is lacking. To this end, field sampling has been conducted in a semi-natural mountain ecosystem in Norway and freshwater aquatic systems in Finland. It is envisaged that the data derived from the studies briefly described in this report will provide fundamental information for our understanding of the behaviour and fate of natural decay series radionuclides in terrestrial and aquatic systems and provide the basis for more robust way.

[1]  Nick Beresford,et al.  D-ERICA: An integrated approach to the assessment and management of environmental risk from ionising radiation. Description of purpose, methodology and application. , 2007 .

[2]  J. Sanchez-Cabeza,et al.  Natural and artificial radioactivity in surface waters of the Ebro river basin (Northeast Spain) , 2000 .

[3]  P. Strand,et al.  Framework for the protection of the environment from ionising radiation , 2000 .

[4]  R J Pentreath,et al.  Radiation protection of people and the environment: developing a common approach , 2002, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[5]  Alan Simcock,et al.  Ospar Convention On The Protection Of The Marine Environment Of The North-East Atlantic , 2006 .

[6]  J. Valentin,et al.  A framework for assessing the impact of ionising radiation on non-human species , 2003, Annals of the ICRP.

[7]  R. Blackburn,et al.  Radon-222 and related activities in surface waters of the English Lake District. , 1999, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[8]  Doe Standard,et al.  A GRADED APPROACH FOR EVALUATING RADIATION DOSES TO AQUATIC AND TERRESTRIAL BIOTA , 2002 .

[9]  M. Skowrońska-Smolak,et al.  Transfer of 210Pb and 210Po to plants via root system and above-ground interception , 1995 .

[10]  Lawrence N. Rothenberg,et al.  National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) Scientific Committee 72-Radiation Protection in Clinical Mammography: A Progress Report , 1983, Other Conferences.

[11]  P. Santschi,et al.  Radionuclides in aquatic environments , 1989 .

[12]  P. Hameed,et al.  Radium-226 levels in the Cauvery river ecosystem, India , 1997, Journal of Biosciences.

[13]  Nick Beresford,et al.  Assessment of naturally occurring radionuclides in England and Wales. , 2007 .

[14]  R. Pentreath Radiological Protection Criteria for the Natural Environment , 1998 .

[15]  Larsson Cm,et al.  The FASSET framework for assessment of environmental impact of ionising radiation in European ecosystems--an overview. , 2004 .

[16]  R. Sievert,et al.  Book Reviews : Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (as amended 1959 and revised 1962). I.C.R.P. Publication 6. 70 pp. PERGAMON PRESS. Oxford, London and New York, 1964. £1 5s. 0d. [TB/54] , 1964 .

[17]  H. Peterson Assessing the impact of deep sea disposal of low level radioactive waste on living marine resources: IAEA Technical Report Series Publication No. 288, International Atomic Energy Agency, 1988. 127 pp. STI/DOC/10/288. ISBN 92-0-125488-1. Price: (US)$31 , 1989 .

[18]  Icrp A report on progress towards new recommendations: a communication from the International Commission on Radiological Protection , 2001 .

[19]  H. Reissig Assessing the Impact of Deep Sea Disposal of Low Level Radioactive Waste on Living Marine Resources = Technical Reports Series No. 288.—127pp., 10 figs., 11 tab., 1 app. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency 1988. ISBN 92‐0‐125488‐1. ÖS 320.00 , 1989 .

[20]  C-M Larsson The FASSET framework for assessment of environmental impact of ionising radiation in European ecosystems--an overview. , 2004, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[21]  R J Pentreath,et al.  A system for radiological protection of the environment: some initial thoughts and ideas. , 1999, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[22]  B. Elkin,et al.  Regional variation in radionuclide concentrations and radiation dose in caribou (Rangifer tarandus) in the Canadian Arctic; 1992-94. , 1996, The Science of the total environment.

[23]  伊沢 正実,et al.  Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection , 1961 .

[24]  G. F. Bennett,et al.  The principles of radioactive waste management , 1997 .

[25]  Charley Yu,et al.  An international comparison of models and approaches for the estimation of the radiological exposure of non-human biota. , 2008, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[26]  P. Hameed,et al.  A study of polonium-210 distribution aspects in the riverine ecosystem of Kaveri, Tiruchirappalli, India. , 1997, Environmental pollution.

[27]  L. Skuterud,et al.  (90)Sr, (210)Po and (210)Pb in lichen and reindeer in Norway. , 2005, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[28]  D Copplestone,et al.  Derivation of transfer parameters for use within the ERICA Tool and the default concentration ratios for terrestrial biota. , 2008, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[29]  R. Pentreath,et al.  A system for protecting the environment from ionising radiation: selecting reference fauna and flora, and the possible dose models and environmental geometries that could be applied to them. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.

[30]  J E Brown,et al.  Radiation doses to aquatic organisms from natural radionuclides , 2004, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.