18F-FDG PET in malignant lymphoma: significance of positive findings
暂无分享,去创建一个
A. Alavi | C. Nanni | D. Rubello | S. Fanti | R. Franchi | P. Zinzani | L. Alinari | M. Farsad | G. Battista | N. Monetti | P. Castellucci | R. Canini | M. Pourdehnad | V. Stefoni | M. Tani
[1] Maria A. Rodriguez,et al. Second Malignancies After Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy for Hodgkin Disease , 2004, American journal of clinical oncology.
[2] Mithat Gonen,et al. Patterns of (18)F-FDG uptake in adipose tissue and muscle: a potential source of false-positives for PET. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[3] F. Bénard,et al. Prognostic value of PET using 18F-FDG in Hodgkin's disease for posttreatment evaluation. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[4] S. Reske. PET and restaging of malignant lymphoma including residual masses and relapse , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[5] M. O'Doherty,et al. Limitations of PET for imaging lymphoma , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[6] M. O'Doherty,et al. Positron emission tomography in the management of lymphomas: a summary , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[7] P. Hoskin. PET in lymphoma: what are the oncologist's needs? , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[8] Patrick Dupont,et al. [18F]FDG PET monitoring of tumour response to chemotherapy: does [18F]FDG uptake correlate with the viable tumour cell fraction? , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[9] M. O'Doherty,et al. Positron emission tomography in the management of lymphomas. , 2002, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).
[10] D. Costa,et al. Challenging cases and diagnostic dilemmas: case 2. Pitfalls of positron emission tomography for assessing residual mediastinal mass after chemotherapy for Hodgkin's disease. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[11] V. Diehl,et al. Thoracic positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose for the evaluation of residual mediastinal Hodgkin disease. , 2001, Blood.
[12] S S Gambhir,et al. A tabulated summary of the FDG PET literature. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[13] N. Avril,et al. Pitfalls in imaging Hodgkin's disease with computed tomography and positron emission tomography using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose. , 2001, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[14] L. Kostakoglu,et al. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the staging and follow-up of lymphoma: is it time to shift gears? , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[15] M. Schwaiger,et al. Positron Emission Tomography in Diagnosis and Therapy Monitoring of Patients with Lymphoma. , 1998, Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T.
[16] A. Belakhlef,et al. False-positive FDG-PET imaging of the thymus of a child with Hodgkin's disease. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[17] Ludwig G. Strauss,et al. Fluorine-18 deoxyglucose and false-positive results: a major problem in the diagnostics of oncological patients , 1996, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[18] M. Schwaiger,et al. PET imaging of somatostatin receptors: design, synthesis and preclinical evaluation of a novel 18F-labelled, carbohydrated analogue of octreotide , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[19] R L Wahl,et al. Pitfalls in oncologic diagnosis with FDG PET imaging: physiologic and benign variants. , 1999, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.