Gradient substrate assembly for quantifying cellular response to biomaterials.

Using quantitative fluorescence microscopy in conjunction with a method of gradient substrate assembly established in their group, the authors were able to introduce and measure reproducible changes in cellular morphology and cell density by manipulating polymer grafting density. The mechanism behind this change in cellular behavior was explained by a semiempirical, geometric model that describes the effect of the spatial distribution of the polymer on protein attachment. A 10-fold increase in graft density of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) [PHEMA] along the surface of a gradient sample, preexposed to bovine fibronectin, caused a change in the size of fibroblasts on the surface (i.e., cell spreading) from (1238 +/- 704) to (377 +/- 216) microm(2). The results were in quantitative agreement with those obtained on three separate gradient samples. Both cellular response and fibronectin adsorption (as measured via ellipsometry) were found to vary sigmoidally with graft density of PHEMA, demonstrating the high degree of correlation between the two phenomena. A simple, rigid-disk model accounting for the surface coverage of PHEMA was able to predict the amount of adsorbed fibronectin with a correlation coefficient of 0.97. Maximal cell adhesion and cell spreading were found to occur at fibronectin surface densities of 50 and 100 ng/cm(2), respectively. The results demonstrate the role of gradient substrate assembly as a method for quantifying the relationship between protein and cellular response to technologically relevant polymeric materials.

[1]  M. Carignano,et al.  On the structure and pressure of tethered polymer layers in good solvent , 1995 .

[2]  M. Martins,et al.  Albumin and fibrinogen adsorption on PU-PHEMA surfaces. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[3]  P. G. de Gennes,et al.  Conformations of Polymers Attached to an Interface , 1980 .

[4]  D. Grainger,et al.  Modulating fibroblast adhesion, spreading, and proliferation using self-assembled monolayer films of alkylthiolates on gold. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[5]  John T. Woodward,et al.  Thin Films of Collagen Affect Smooth Muscle Cell Morphology , 2003 .

[6]  S. Brocchini,et al.  A Combinatorial Approach for Polymer Design , 1997 .

[7]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Cell shape provides global control of focal adhesion assembly. , 2003, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[8]  P. Moghe,et al.  PEG-variant biomaterials as selectively adhesive protein templates: model surfaces for controlled cell adhesion and migration. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[9]  A S Hoffman,et al.  Protein adsorption to poly(ethylene oxide) surfaces. , 1991, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[10]  Didier Benoit,et al.  Controlled Synthesis of Polymer Brushes by “Living” Free Radical Polymerization Techniques , 1999 .

[11]  W. Norde,et al.  Interaction of bovine serum albumin and human blood plasma with PEO-tethered surfaces: influence of PEO chain length, grafting density, and temperature. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[12]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[13]  David Farrar,et al.  Interpretation of protein adsorption: surface-induced conformational changes. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[14]  Alamgir Karim,et al.  Combinatorial characterization of cell interactions with polymer surfaces. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[15]  Ying Mei,et al.  Solid-phase ATRP synthesis of peptide-polymer hybrids. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[16]  G. Baker,et al.  Functionalization of surfaces by water-accelerated atom-transfer radical polymerization of hydroxyethyl methacrylate and subsequent derivatization , 2002 .

[17]  Benjamin G Keselowsky,et al.  Surface chemistry modulates fibronectin conformation and directs integrin binding and specificity to control cell adhesion. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[18]  Jeffrey A Hubbell,et al.  Biomaterials science and high-throughput screening , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  S. Satija,et al.  Self-Organization of Polymer Brush Layers in a Poor Solvent , 1995 .

[20]  Janos Vörös,et al.  The density and refractive index of adsorbing protein layers. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[21]  J. Hubbell,et al.  An RGD spacing of 440 nm is sufficient for integrin alpha V beta 3- mediated fibroblast spreading and 140 nm for focal contact and stress fiber formation , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.

[22]  L. Griffith,et al.  Tissue Engineering--Current Challenges and Expanding Opportunities , 2002, Science.

[23]  Ying Mei,et al.  Tuning cell adhesion on gradient poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate)-grafted surfaces. , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[24]  Premnath,et al.  Poly(ethylene oxide) Grafted to Silicon Surfaces: Grafting Density and Protein Adsorption. , 1998, Macromolecules.

[25]  J. H. Lee,et al.  Protein-resistant surfaces prepared by PEO-containing block copolymer surfactants. , 1989, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[26]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  Fabrication of gradient hydrogels using a microfluidics/photopolymerization process. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[27]  Cameron J Wilson,et al.  Mediation of biomaterial-cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: a review. , 2005, Tissue engineering.

[28]  G. Walker,et al.  Force microscopy studies of fibronectin adsorption and subsequent cellular adhesion to substrates with well-defined surface chemistries. , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[29]  K. Healy.  Molecular engineering of materials for bioreactivity , 1999 .

[30]  Ratmir Derda,et al.  Arrays for the combinatorial exploration of cell adhesion. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[31]  Daniel G. Anderson,et al.  Nanoliter-scale synthesis of arrayed biomaterials and application to human embryonic stem cells , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[32]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.

[33]  J. Takebe,et al.  Anodic oxidation and hydrothermal treatment of titanium results in a surface that causes increased attachment and altered cytoskeletal morphology of rat bone marrow stromal cells in vitro. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[34]  H. J. Griesser,et al.  Polymer surface chemistry and bone cell migration. , 1998, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[35]  Tejal A. Desai,et al.  Immobilization of RGD to silicon surfaces for enhanced cell adhesion and proliferation. , 2002 .

[36]  S. Armes,et al.  Well-Defined Biocompatible Block Copolymers via Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization of 2-Methacryloyloxyethyl Phosphorylcholine in Protic Media , 2003 .

[37]  Milan Mrksich,et al.  Dynamic interfaces between cells and surfaces: electroactive substrates that sequentially release and attach cells. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[38]  Todd Emrick,et al.  PEG- and peptide-grafted aliphatic polyesters by click chemistry. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[39]  George M. Whitesides,et al.  Using Mixed Self-Assembled Monolayers Presenting RGD and (EG)3OH Groups To Characterize Long-Term Attachment of Bovine Capillary Endothelial Cells to Surfaces , 1998 .

[40]  C. Murphy,et al.  Adhesion and proliferation of corneal epithelial cells on self-assembled monolayers. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[41]  D. Castner,et al.  Biomedical surface science: Foundations to frontiers , 2002 .

[42]  W. Norde,et al.  Tethered polymer chains: surface chemistry and their impact on colloidal and surface properties. , 2003, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[43]  Joachim Kohn,et al.  New approaches to biomaterials design , 2004, Nature materials.

[44]  J. Genzer,et al.  Tailoring Cell Adhesion Using Surface‐Grafted Polymer Gradient Assemblies , 2005 .

[45]  S. Cooper,et al.  Leukocyte adhesion on model surfaces under flow: effects of surface chemistry, protein adsorption, and shear rate. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[46]  Bengt Herbert Kasemo,et al.  Biological surface science , 1998 .

[47]  Buddy D. Ratner,et al.  Endothelial cell growth and protein adsorption on terminally functionalized, self-assembled monolayers of alkanethiolates on gold , 1997 .

[48]  Martin Malmsten,et al.  Effect of chain density on inhibition of protein adsorption by poly(ethylene glycol) based coatings , 1998 .

[49]  J. Vacanti,et al.  Tissue engineering : Frontiers in biotechnology , 1993 .

[50]  S W Hui,et al.  Grafted poly-(ethylene glycol) on lipid surfaces inhibits protein adsorption and cell adhesion. , 1997, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[51]  Newell R Washburn,et al.  High-throughput investigation of osteoblast response to polymer crystallinity: influence of nanometer-scale roughness on proliferation. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[52]  V. Šubr,et al.  Formation and properties of anchored polymers with a gradual variation of grafting densities on flat substrates , 2003 .

[53]  Benjamin G. Keselowsky,et al.  Adsorption-Induced Conformational Changes in Fibronectin Due to Interactions with Well-Defined Surface Chemistries , 2003 .

[54]  W. Huck,et al.  Polymer brushes via surface-initiated polymerizations. , 2004, Chemical Society reviews.

[55]  Katja Jankova,et al.  Optimizing Cell−Surface Interactions by Photografting of Poly(ethylene glycol) , 2000 .