Institutional theory and the cross-national transfer of employment policy: the case of ‘workforce diversity’ in US multinationals

This paper uses a comparative institutionalist approach combined with a power/interests perspective to examine the processes whereby diversity policy is ‘internationalised’ by US multinational companies. It argues that the process of policy transfer to UK subsidiaries is complicated by incomplete and contested ‘institutionalisation’ of diversity within the US itself, and by differing conceptions of diversity between the US and the UK. The ability of actors within the UK subsidiaries to mobilise and deploy specific power resources allows them to resist the full implementation of corporate diversity policy, leading to a range of compromise accommodations. It is argued that the findings have more general implications for analysing the transfer of HR practices between national business systems.

[1]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[2]  L. Harter,et al.  Speaking the Language of the Bottom-Line: The Metaphor of "Managing Diversity" , 2003 .

[3]  L. Zucker Institutional patterns and organizations : culture and environment , 1989 .

[4]  Nancy K. Napier,et al.  Toward an Integrative Model of Strategic International Human Resource Management , 1996 .

[5]  P. Lorange,et al.  The Two Logics Behind Human Resource Management , 1990 .

[6]  P. Hall,et al.  Varieties of Capitalism , 2001 .

[7]  James Mahoney,et al.  Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences , 2004, Perspectives on Politics.

[8]  Peer Hull Kristensen,et al.  The Multinational Firm: Organizing Across Institutional and National Divides , 2003 .

[9]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[10]  P. Hall Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences: ALIGNING ONTOLOGY AND METHODOLOGY IN COMPARATIVE POLITICS , 2003 .

[11]  T. Kostova,et al.  Organizational Legitimacy Under Conditions of Complexity: The Case of the Multinational Enterprise , 1999 .

[12]  B. Loasby The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective , 1979 .

[13]  T. Kostova Transnational Transfer of Strategic Organizational Practices: A Contextual Perspective , 1999 .

[14]  Jonathan S. Leonard,et al.  The effects of diversity on business performance: Report of the diversity research network , 2003 .

[15]  Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld,et al.  Knowledge-Driven Work: Unexpected Lessons from Japanese and United States Work Practices , 1998 .

[16]  Frank Dobbin,et al.  War and Peace: The Evolution of Modern Personnel Administration in U.S. Industry , 1986, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  M. Bond,et al.  Diversity Dilemmas at Work , 1998 .

[18]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge Flows and the Structure of Control Within Multinational Corporations , 1991 .

[19]  M. Bendick,et al.  Workforce diversity initiatives of U.S. multinational corporations in Europe , 2003 .

[20]  Peter J. Dowling,et al.  An Integrative Framework of Strategic International Human Resource Management , 1993 .

[21]  Jitendra V. Singh,et al.  Organizational Environments and the Multinational Enterprise , 1991 .

[22]  Linda Dickens,et al.  Gender Equality and Trade Unions: A New Basis for Mobilisation? , 2001 .

[23]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[24]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Horses for Courses: Organizational Forms for Multinational Corporations , 1993 .

[25]  A. Ferner,et al.  ‘Vanguard’ Subsidiaries and the Diffusion of New Practices: A Case Study of German Multinationals , 2000 .

[26]  R. Whitley How and Why are International Firms Different? the consequences of cross-border managerial coordination for firm characteristics and behaviour , 2001 .

[27]  Sten Jönsson Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[28]  P. Meiksins,et al.  System, Society and Dominance Effects in Cross-National Organisational Analysis , 1995 .

[29]  C. Lindblom,et al.  The New Men of Power: America's Labor Leaders. , 1949 .

[30]  O. Richard Racial Diversity, Business Strategy, and Firm Performance: A Resource-Based View , 2000 .

[31]  Antonello Zanfei Transnational Firms and the Changing Organisation of Innovative Activities , 2000 .

[32]  Taylor Cox,et al.  Cultural diversity in organizations , 1993 .

[33]  Paul DiMaggio Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory , 1988 .

[34]  G. Whitehouse Legislation and Labour Market Gender Inequality: An Analysis of OECD Countries , 1992 .

[35]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Multinational Subsidiary Evolution: Capability and Charter Change in Foreign-Owned Subsidiary Companies , 1998 .

[36]  Gary Dessler,et al.  A Framework for Human Resource Management , 2001 .

[37]  Rose Mary Wentling,et al.  Current status of diversity initiatives in selected multinational corporations , 1997 .

[38]  L. Zucker The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. , 1977 .

[39]  Tony Edwards,et al.  Multinationals, Reverse Diffusion and National Business Systems , 2004 .

[40]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[41]  Alice Lam,et al.  Organizational Learning in Multinationals: R&D Networks of Japanese and US MNEs in the UK* , 2003 .

[42]  Christel Lane,et al.  Management and Labour in Europe: The Industrial Enterprise in Germany, Britain and France , 1989 .

[43]  L. Ortiz Union Response to Teamwork: the Case of Opel Spain , 1998 .

[44]  Aaron A. Baker Access vs Process in Employment Discrimination: Why ADR Suits the US but not the UK , 2002 .

[45]  Mike Noon,et al.  Equality, diversity and disadvantage in employment , 2001 .

[46]  David Terkla,et al.  The adoption and diffusion of high-performance management: lessons from Japanese multinationals in the West , 2003 .

[47]  A. Ferner COUNTRY OF ORIGIN EFFECTS AND HRM IN MULTINATIONAL COMPANIES , 1997 .

[48]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[49]  David A. Ricks,et al.  Multinational Parent Companies’ Influence over Human Resource Decisions of Affiliates: U.S. Firms in Mexico , 1989 .

[50]  Michael R. Reich,et al.  Segmented Work, Divided Workers: The Historical Transformation of Labor in the United States , 1982 .

[51]  T. Kostova,et al.  Adoption of an Organizational Practice by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects , 2002 .

[52]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Subsidiary Initiatives to Develop New Markets , 1998 .

[53]  K. S. Wever Negotiating Competitiveness: Employment Relations and Organizational Innovation in Germany and the United States , 1995 .

[54]  Parshotam Dass,et al.  Strategies for managing human resource diversity: From resistance to learning , 1999 .

[55]  W. Scott,et al.  Tracking the Giant Corporation@@@Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. , 1991 .

[56]  Nitin Nohria,et al.  Influences on Human Resource Management Practices in Multinational Corporations , 1994 .

[57]  Linda Dickens,et al.  Beyond the business case: a three‐pronged approach to equality action , 1999 .

[58]  G. Kreweras Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values: Geert HOFSTEDE Sage Publications, London, 1980, 475 pages, £18.75 , 1982 .

[59]  R. Townshend-Smith Discrimination law : text, cases and materials , 1998 .

[60]  S. Liff Two routes to managing diversity: individual differences or social group characteristics , 1997 .

[61]  R. Boyer,et al.  Between imitation and innovation : the transfer and hybridization of productive models in the international automobile industry , 1998 .

[62]  C. Oliver STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[63]  J. Wajcman,et al.  ‘Sameness’ and ‘Difference’ Revisited: Which Way Forward For Equal Opportunity Initiatives? , 1996 .

[64]  E. Heery Campaigning for Part-Time Workers , 1998 .

[65]  C. Agócs,et al.  Employment equity, affirmative action and managing diversity: assessing the differences , 1996 .

[66]  Richard Whitley,et al.  Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems , 1999 .

[67]  Alice Lam Embedded Firms, Embedded Knowledge: Problems of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer in Global Cooperative Ventures , 1997 .

[68]  L. L. Kurowski Cloaked culture and veiled diversity: why theorists ignored early US workforce diversity , 2002 .

[69]  P. Walgenbach,et al.  *Global Standardization of Organizational Forms and Management Practices? What New Institutionalism and the Business-Systems Approach Can Learn from Each Other , 2007 .

[70]  I. Clark,et al.  Looking for `Americanness': Home-Country, Sector and Firm Effects on Employment Systems in an Engineering Services Company , 2002 .

[71]  Michael R. Reich,et al.  Segmented Work, Divided Workers: The Historical Transformation of Labor in the United States , 1982 .