Communities and social enterprises in the age of globalization

Purpose - The goal of this paper is to develop a conceptual framework to understand the processes by which rural communities are using commons-based social enterprises to engage global actors and forge local places. Design/methodology/approach - The paper uses a four-step conceptualization of commons-based social enterprises within a complex world: deal with communities as complex systems embedded in larger complex systems, understand cross-scale linkages between communities and other levels of organization, identify drivers of change, and build adaptive capacity to increase the resilience of communities in the face of globalization. The paper draws upon an international set of cases undertaken by the Centre for Community-based Resource Management to illustrate each step. Findings - Social enterprises are one means by which rural communities are negotiating with global actors through recent processes of globalization. The social enterprise provides a mechanism for rural people to secure tenure for common-pool resources and allows them to make direct decisions regarding their management. Research limitations/implications - To further develop the understanding of commons-based social enterprises will require further integration of theory regarding commons and social enterprises. Practical implications - States and development agencies lack enabling policies for commons-based social enterprises that support the multiple goal strategies of rural communities for natural resources. Originality/value - Commons and social enterprise literature have tended to exist in separate domains and this paper makes a first step toward their integration.

[1]  W. Leonard,et al.  Local financial benefits of rain forests. Comparative evidence from Amerindian societies in Bolivia and Honduras , 2002 .

[2]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Panarchy Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems , 2002 .

[3]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Enchantment and Disenchantment: The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation , 1999 .

[4]  R. Anderson,et al.  Indigenous Land Rights, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Development in Canada: 'Opting-In' to the Global Economy , 2006 .

[5]  F. Berkes,et al.  Development and Conservation: Indigenous Businesses and the UNDP Equator Initiative , 2006 .

[6]  D. Bray,et al.  Mexico's Community‐Managed Forests as a Global Model for Sustainable Landscapes , 2003 .

[7]  E. Ostrom,et al.  The globalization of socio-ecological systems: An agenda for scientific research , 2006 .

[8]  J. Kalt,et al.  What Can Tribes Do? Strategies and Institutions in American Indian Economic Development. American Indian Manual and Handbook Series No. 4. , 1994 .

[9]  C. Padoch,et al.  Amazon Forestry Transformed: Integrating Knowledge for Smallholder Timber Management in Eastern Brazil , 2007 .

[10]  Lain Davidson‐Hunt.  Negotiating a Pastoral Livelihood in a Mountain Commons of the Western Indian Himalayas , 1997 .

[11]  F. Berkes,et al.  DIVERSITY OF COMMON PROPERTY RESOURCE USE AND DIVERSITY OF SOCIAL INTERESTS IN THE WESTERN INDIAN HIMALAYA , 1998 .

[12]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. , 1999, Science.

[13]  F. Berkes,et al.  Biodiversity, traditional management systems, and cultural landscapes: examples from the boreal forest of Canada , 2006 .

[14]  A. McMichael,et al.  Ecosystems and Human well-being , 2003 .

[15]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Sustainability Science , 2019, Critical Skills for Environmental Professionals.

[16]  Elizabeth R. DeSombre,et al.  The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale , 2002 .

[17]  D. Feeny,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons: Twenty-two years later , 1990, Human ecology.

[18]  D. Armitage.  Community-Based Narwhal Management in Nunavut, Canada: Change, Uncertainty, and Adaptation , 2005 .

[19]  Louis Lebel,et al.  Guest Editorial, part of a Special Feature on Scale and Cross-scale Dynamics Scale and Cross-Scale Dynamics: Governance and Information in a Multilevel World , 2006 .

[20]  E. Ostrom.  Understanding Institutional Diversity , 2005 .

[21]  C. Cavalcanti.  Economic Thinking, Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Ethnoeconomics , 2002 .

[22]  I. Davidson-Hunt.  Journeys, plants and dreams : adaptive learning and social - ecological resilience , 2003 .

[23]  M. Scheffer,et al.  Globalization, Roving Bandits, and Marine Resources , 2006, Science.

[24]  James C. Scott.  Afterword to moral economies, state spaces, and categorical violence , 2005 .

[25]  Sanghamitra Mahanty,et al.  Conservation and Development Interventions as Networks: The Case of the India Ecodevelopment Project, Karnataka , 2002 .

[26]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Resilience and Sustainable Development: Building Adaptive Capacity in a World of Transformations , 2002, Ambio.

[27]  D. Capistrano,et al.  Ecosystems and human well-being: multiscale assessments: findings of the Sub-global Assessments Working Group of the Millenium Ecosystem Assessment , 2005 .

[28]  A. Escobar.  Encountering Development : The Making and Unmaking of the Third World , 1994 .