Sensor data fusion plays an important role in current and future vehicular active safety systems. The development of new advanced sensors is not sufficient enough without the utilisation of enhanced signal processing techniques such as the data fusion methods. A stand alone sensor cannot overcome certain physical limitations as for example the limited range and the field of view. Therefore combining information coming from different sensors broadens the area around the vehicle covered by sensors and increases the reliability of the whole system in case of sensor failure. In general, data fusion is not something innovative in research; a lot has been done for military applications, but it is rather a new approach in the automotive field. The state-ofthe-art in the automotive field is the fusion of many heterogeneous onboard sensors, e.g. radars, laserscanners, cameras, GPS devices and inertial sensors, and the use of map data coming from digital map databases. A functional model very similar to the Joint Directors of Laboratories (JDL), which is the most prevalent in data fusion, is used in automotive fusion. According to this model the data processing is divided to the following levels: signal, object, situation and application. All these levels communicate and exchange data through a storage and system manager. The JDL model is only a functional model which allows different architectures for fusion implementation. These architectures are divided in centralized, distributed and hybrid; each one has advantages and disadvantages. In the data fusion process the main focus is on object and situation refinement levels, which refer to the state estimation of objects and the relations among them, correspondingly. The discrimination between these levels is also made by using the terms low and high level fusion instead of object and situation refinement. There are several vehicular applications that fusion of data coming from many different sensors is necessary. These can be divided into three main categories: longitudinal support, lateral support and intersection safety applications. There is a current tendency to exploit also wireless communications in vehicles. Talking cars forming ad hoc networks may be useful in future applications to cover more safety cases that can not be covered so far, due to physical limitations of onboard sensors. In this way the electronic horizon and the awareness of the driver can be extended even to some kilometres away. A lot of ongoing research is focused on the design of efficient protocols and architectures for vehicular ad hoc networks and on the standardization of this kind of vehicular communication. O pe n A cc es s D at ab as e w w w .in te ch w eb .o rg
[1]
Didier Dubois,et al.
Fuzzy sets and systems ' . Theory and applications
,
2007
.
[2]
Angelos Amditis,et al.
Revisiting JDL model for automotive safety applications: the PF2 functional model
,
2006,
2006 9th International Conference on Information Fusion.
[3]
Angelos Amditis,et al.
Sensor Fusion for Predicting Vehicles' Path for Collision Avoidance Systems
,
2007,
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[4]
A. Amditis,et al.
Detection of maneuvers using evidence theory
,
2008,
2008 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.
[5]
Finn V. Jensen,et al.
Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs
,
2001,
Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.
[6]
Angelos Amditis,et al.
Situation refinement for vehicle maneuver identification and driver's intention prediction
,
2007,
2007 10th International Conference on Information Fusion.
[7]
Glenn Shafer,et al.
A Mathematical Theory of Evidence
,
2020,
A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.
[8]
Arthur P. Dempster,et al.
A Generalization of Bayesian Inference
,
1968,
Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions.
[9]
Y. Bar-Shalom,et al.
A generalized S-D assignment algorithm for multisensor-multitarget state estimation
,
1997,
IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.
[10]
Angelos Amditis,et al.
Track based multi sensor data fusion for collision mitigation
,
2008,
2008 11th International Conference on Information Fusion.
[11]
Samuel S. Blackman,et al.
Design and Analysis of Modern Tracking Systems
,
1999
.
[12]
R. A. Singer,et al.
Computer control of multiple site track correlation
,
1971
.
[13]
Jeffrey K. Uhlmann,et al.
Covariance consistency methods for fault-tolerant distributed data fusion
,
2003,
Inf. Fusion.
[14]
Angelos Amditis,et al.
On the track-to-track association problem in road environments
,
2007,
2007 10th International Conference on Information Fusion.
[15]
Huei Peng,et al.
Road Friction Coefficient Estimation For Vehicle Path Prediction
,
1996
.
[16]
Yaakov Bar-Shalom,et al.
Estimation and Tracking: Principles, Techniques, and Software
,
1993
.
[17]
Y. Bar-Shalom.
On the track-to-track correlation problem
,
1981
.
[18]
Ruediger Lamm,et al.
Highway Design and Traffic Safety Engineering Handbook
,
1999
.
[19]
Michael O. Kolawole,et al.
Estimation and tracking
,
2002
.